You are here

Home » Content

Tek diş implant uygulamalarında multidisipliner yaklaşım: olgu sunumu

Multidisciplinary approach in the single tooth implant application: a case report

Journal Name:

  • Gülhane Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Implant application has been a frequently used treatment modality in the restoration of the missing single tooth at posterior region. In the presented case, second molar that was tipped and mesialized due to the early loss of the lower first molar was uprighted and distalized with orthodontic treatment. Prosthetic restoration was performed by the placement of two implants to the region of missing tooth. The use of two implants was preferred to prevent the bone resorption and to increase the stability of the prosthetic restoration by reducing the occlusal overload at the posterior region, during chewing.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Posteriyor bölge tek diş eksikliklerinin restorasyonlarında implant uygulamaları, son yıllarda oldukça sık kullanılan bir tedavi seçeneği olmuştur. Sunulan olguda, ortodontik tedavi ile alt birinci büyük azı dişinin erken kaybına bağlı olarak meziyalize olmuş ve devrilmiş ikinci büyük azı dişi düzeltilmiş ve distale itilmiştir. Eksik olan diş bölgesine iki adet implant yerleştirilerek, protetik restorasyon uygulanmıştır. İkili implant uygulaması, çiğneme sırasında posteriyor bölgede meydana gelen oklüzal yükü azaltarak, kemik rezorbsiyonunu önlemek ve protetik restorasyonun stabilitesini artırmak için tercih edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-tek-dis-implant-uygulamalarinda-multidisipliner-yaklasim-olgu-sunumu.pdf
  • 4
303-308
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Carvalho W, Casado PL, Caula AL,
Barbazo EP. Implants for single first molar
replacement: important treatment concerns. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 328-335.
2. Moscovitch M. Molar restorations supported by 2 implants: an alternative to wide
implants. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67: 535-
539.
3. Dhanrajani PJ, al Abdulkarim SA.
Management of severe hypodontia.
Implant Dent 2002; 11: 338-342.
4. Richardson G, Russell KA. Congenitally
missing maxillary lateral incisors and
orthodontic treatment considerations for
the single-tooth implant. J Can Dent Assoc
2001; 67: 25-28.
5. Dalkýz M, Zor M, Aykul H, Toparlý M,
Aksoy S. The three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed bridge restoration
supported by the combination of teeth and
osseointegrated implants. Implant Dent
2002; 11: 293-300.
6. Þahin S, Çehreli MC, Yalçýn E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implant-supported prostheses-a
review. J Dent 2002; 30: 271-282.
7. Sato Y, Shindoi N, Hosokawa R, Tsuga K,
Akagawa Y. Biomechanical effects of double or wide implants for single molar
replacement in the posterior mandibular
region. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 842-845.
8. Petropoulos VC, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ.
Complications of mandibular molar replacement with a single implant: a case report. J Can Dent Assoc 2004; 70: 238-242.
9. Higuchi KW. Orthodontic applications of
osseointegrated implants. Quintessence
Publishing Co, Inc. 2000: 133-149
10. Iseri H, Solow B. Change in the width of
the mandibular body from 6 to 23 years of
age: an implant study. Eur J Orthod 2000;
22: 229-238.
11. Ülgen M. Ortodonti-Anomaliler, Sefalometri, Etiyoloji, Büyüme ve Geliþim, Taný.
Ýstanbul: Yeditepe Üniversitesi Yayýnlarý,
2000: 203-205.
12. Beydemir B, Dalkýz M. Protetik Diþ
Tedavisinde Teþhis ve Planlama. Ankara:
GATA Basýmevi, 2002: 134-135.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com