You are here

Home » Content

Flaş elektroretinogram (FERG) normal değerlerimiz

Our normal values of flash electroretinogram

Journal Name:

  • Gülhane Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to have normative values of flash electroretinogram for flash electroretinogram evaluations. Flash electroretinograms belonging to volunteers who did not have any systemic and ocular pathology were recorded in the electrophysiology laboratory at the Ophthalmology Department of Gulhane Military Medical Academy. The results were categorized into three age groups of 8-19, 20-39 and 40-59. All the recordings were made by using the recommended standards of International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. On the basis of International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision recommendations, normative values of flash electroretinogram were presented using the median values, and minimum and maximum limits belonging to 95% confidence interval were also calculated. An emphasis was made that each laboratory should have its normative values in its own laboratory environment. Our results may be used as a reference for laboratories that are yet to assess their own normative values.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmamızda flaş elektroretinografi testi değerlendirmelerimiz için normal değerlerimizin tanımlanması amaçlanmıştır. GATA Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı Oküler Elektrofizyoloji laboratuvarında, sistemik ve oküler herhangi bir sorunu olmayan gönüllülere flaş elektroretinografi testi uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlar yaşlara göre üç grup halinde (8-19; 20-39; 40-59) değerlendirilmiştir. Tüm kayıtlar Uluslararası Elektrofizyoloji Cemiyeti'nin tavsiye ettiği standartlar kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Uluslararası Elektrofizyoloji Cemiyeti'nin tavsiyeleri doğrultusunda flaş elektroretinografi normal değerleri ortanca cinsinden verilmiş ve %95 güven aralığında alt ve üst sınırlar da hesaplanmıştır. Elektrofizyoloji laboratuvarlarının normal değerlerini kendi özgün ortamlarında belirlemeleri gerekliliği vurgulanmıştır. Bu sonuçlar normal değerlerini henüz ortaya koymamış laboratuvarlar için referans teşkil edebilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-flas-elektroretinogram-ferg-normal-degerlerimiz.pdf
  • 1
14-18
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Marmor MF, Holder G.E, Seeliger MW,
Yamamoto S. Standard for clinical electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 2004;
108: 107-114.
2. Ýlker SS, Sobacý G, Yýldýrým E. Flaþ ERG,
Desen ERG, EOG, flaþ VER, desen VER,
desen Onset-Offset VER'in toplumumuzdaki normal deðerleri. Türk Oftalmoloji
Gazetesi 1992; 22: 193-195.
3. Harden A, Adams GGW, Taylor DSI. The
electroretinogram. Arch Dis Child 1989;
64: 1080-1087.
4. Jacobi PC, Miliczek KD, Zrenner E.
Experiences with the international standart
for clinical electroretinography: normative
values for clinical practice, interindividual
and intraindividual variations and possible
extensions. Doc Ophthalmol 1993; 85: 95-
114.
5. Burian HM, Allen L. A speculum contact
lens for electroretinography. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1954; 6: 509-
511.
6. Fishman GA. The Electroretinogram. In:
Fishman GA, Birch DG, Holder GA,
Brigell MG (eds). Electrophysiologic
Testing in Disorders of the Retina, Optic
Nerve and Visual Pathway. 2nd ed.
Singapore: The Foundation of the
American Academy of Ophthalmology,
2001: 1-28.
7. Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA.
Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1979; 18:
988-991.
8. Hebert M, Vaegan, Lachapelle P.
Reproducibility of ERG responses obtained
with the DTL electrode. Vis Res 1999; 39:
1069-1070.
9. Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Little JM et al.
Recording the oscillatory potentials of the
electroretinogram with the DTL electrode.
Doc Ophthalmol 1993; 83: 119-130.
10. Gouras P. Electroretinography: some basic
principles. Invest Ophthalmol 1970; 9: 557-
569.
11. Rabin AR, Berson EL. A full-field system
for clinical electroretinography. Arch
Ophthalmol 1974; 92: 59-63.
12. Kooijman AC. Light distribution on the
retina of a wide-angle theoretical eye. J Opt
Soc Am 1983; 73: 1544-1550.
13. Mactier H, Dexter JD, Hewett JE, et al.
The electroretinogram in preterm infants. J
Pediatr 1988; 113: 607-612.
14. Kriss A, Russell-Eggitt I. Electrophysiological assessment of visual pathway function
in infants. Eye 1992; 6: 145-153.
15. Birch DG, Anderson JL. Standardized fulI
field electroretinography: normal values
and their variation with age. Arch
Ophthalmol 1992; 110: 1571-1576.
16. Fulton AB. The development of scotopic
retinal function in human infants. Doc
Ophthalmol 1988; 69: 101-109.
17. Fulton AB, Hansen RM. Electroretinography: application to clinical studies of
infants. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus
1985; 22: 251-255.
18. Tatlýpýnar S, Þener EC, Mocan MC, Sanaç
AÞ. Elektroretinografi parametrelerinin yaþ
ve cinsiyetle iliþkisi. Türk Oftalmoloji18 · Mart 2006 · Gülhane TD Gündoðan ve ark.
Gazetesi 2000; 30: 570-574.
19. Peterson H. The normal B-potential in the
single-flash clinical electroretinogram: a
computer technique study of the influence
of sex and age. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl
1968; 99: 7-77.
20. Yainio-Mattila B. The clinical electroretinogram, II: the difference between the
electroretinogram in men and in women.
Acta Ophthalmol 1951; 29: 25-32.
21. Weleber RG. The effect of age on human
cone and rod ganzfeld electroretinograms.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981; 20: 392-
399.
22. Birch OG, Berson EL, Sandberg MA.
Diurnal rhythm in the human rod ERG.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25: 236-
238.
23. Nozaki S, Wakakura M, Ishikawa S.
Circadian rhythm of human electroretinogram. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1983; 27: 346-352.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com