You are here

Hemodiyaliz hastalarında tedaviye uyum: çok yönlü bir yaklaşım

Adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients: a multiple-aspect approach

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Hemodialysis is the most commonly used method to treat end stage renal disease. In this treatment method, restricted fluid intake and diet, dependence on a machine and changes in lifestyle may affect the patient. Patients may therefore have difficulty in adherence to treatment. Providing adherence to treatment in hemodialysis patients is a significant problem in terms of health status and quality of life. Rates of 50% or higher have been reported in not to adhere to treatment in hemodialysis patients. Handling the factors affecting adherence to treatment for the patients may provide better health outcomes increasing the efficiency of treatment. Removal of factors inhibiting adherence to treatment using a patient-centered approach, and use of ongoing education and cognitive-behavioral strategies may increase adherence. In this review, adherence to treatment and factors affecting adherence in hemodialysis patients are reviewed, and suggestions on this topic are discussed.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Hemodiyaliz, son dönem böbrek yetmezliğini tedavi etmek için kullanılan en yaygın yöntemdir. Bu tedavi yönteminde sıvı alımı ve yiyeceklerin kısıtlanması, makineye bağımlı olma ve yaşam şeklinde değişiklikler hastayı etkileyebilmektedir. Bu nedenle, hastalar tedaviye uyumda zorlanabilmektedirler. Günümüzde hemodiyaliz hastalarında tedaviye uyumun sağlanması, sağlık durumu ve yaşam kalitesi açısından önemli bir sorundur. Hemodiyaliz hastalarında tedaviye uyumsuzluğun %50 veya daha yüksek oranlarda olduğu bildirilmektedir. Hastaların tedaviye uyumunu etkileyen faktörlerin ele alınması, tedavinin etkinliğini artırarak daha iyi sağlık sonuçlarına ulaşmayı sağlayabilir. Hasta merkezli bir yaklaşımla tedaviye uyumu engelleyen faktörlerin ortadan kaldırılması, sürekli eğitim ve bilişsel-davranışsal stratejilerin kullanılması uyumu artırabilir. Bu derlemede, hemodiyaliz hastalarında tedaviye uyum ve etkileyen faktörler gözden geçirilmiş ve bu konudaki öneriler ele alınmıştır.
132-136

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Duyan V. Sosyal grup çalýþmasý
uygulamasýnýn ortopedi hastalarýnýn kiþisel ve sosyal uyum dü-
zeylerine etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Ankara, 1997.
2. Cummings KM, Becker MH,
Kirscht JP, Levin NW. Psychosocial factors affecting adherence to medical regimens in a
group of hemodialysis patients.
Med Care 1982; 20: 567-580.
3. Akýncý F. Hemodiyalize giren hastalarýn psikososyal sorunlarý ve
hemþirelerin sorumluluklarý.
Hemþirelik Forumu 2000; 3: 1-5.
4. Turkish Society of Nephrology.
Registry of the Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation in Turkey, Registry 2004. In: Erek E,
Serdengeçti K, Süleymanlar G
(eds). Ýstanbul: Art Ofset, 2005.
5. Kutner NG, Zhang R, McClellan
WM, Cole SA. Psychosocial predictors of non-compliance in
haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 17: 93-99.
6. Takaki J, Yano E. Possible gender
differences in the relationships of
self-efficacy and the internal locus
of control with compliance in
hemodialysis patients. Behav Med
2006; 32: 5-11.
7. Baines LS, Zawada ET, Jindal
RM. Psychosocial profiling: a
holistic management tool for
non-compliance. Clin Transplant
2005; 19: 38-44.
8. Burns DP. Coping with hemodialysis: a mid-range theory deduced from the roy adaptation
model. Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation, Wayne State University, Michigan, 1997.
9. Kara B, Akbayrak N. Hemodiyaliz: hastalar baþ etmeyi nasýl
öðrenebilirler? Saðlýk ve Toplum
Dergisi 2005; 15: 3-7.
10. Peitzman SJ. From dropsy to
Bright's disease to end-stage renal
disease. Milbank Q 1989; 67
(Suppl 1): 16-32.
11. Christensen AJ. Patient-by-treatment context interaction in
chronic disease: a conceptual
framework for the study of patient
adherence. Psychosom Med 2000;
62: 435-443.
12. Kutner NG. Improving compliance in dialysis patients: does anything work? Semin Dial 2001; 14:
324-327.
13. Rosner F. Patient noncompliance:
causes and solutions. Mt Sinai J
Med 2006; 73: 553-559.
14. Cvengros JA, Christensen AJ,
Lawton WJ. The role of perceived
control and preference for control
in adherence to a chronic medical
regimen. Ann Behav Med 2004;
27: 155-161.
15. White RB. Adherence to the dialysis prescription: partnering with
patients for improved outcomes.
Nephrol Nurs J 2004; 31: 432-435.
16. Hansen SK. Noncompliance.
Nephrol Nurs J 2001; 28: 653-
655.
17. Leggat JE. Adherence with dialysis: a focus on mortality risk.
Semin Dial 2005; 18: 137-141.
18. Hagren B, Pettersen IM, Severinsson E, Lutzen K, Clyne N.
Maintenance haemodialysis: patients' experiences of their life situation. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 294-
300.
19. Welch JL, Thomas-Hawkins C.
Psycho-educational strategies to
promote fluid adherence in adult
hemodialysis patients: a review of
intervention studies. Int J Nurs
Stud 2005; 42: 597-608.
20. Kugler C, Vlaminck H, Haverich
A, Maes B. Nonadherence with
diet and fluid restrictions among
adults having hemodialysis. J
Nurs Scholars 2005; 37: 25-29.
21. O'Brien ME. Compliance behavior and long-term maintenance
dialysis. Am J Kidney Dis 1990; 3:
209-214.
22. Vlaminck H, Maes B, Jacobs A,
Reyntjens S, Evers G. The dialysis
diet and fluid non-adherence
questionnaire: validity testing of a
self-report instrument for clinical
practice. J Clin Nurs 2001; 10:
707-715.
23. Martin PD, McKnight T, Barbera
B, Brantley PJ. Satisfaction with
the multidisciplinary treatment
team: a predictor of hemodialysis
patient compliance. Dial Transplant 2005; 34: 12-18.
24. Mittal SK, Ahern L, Flaster E,
Maesaka JK, Fishbane S. Selfassessed physical and mental
function of hemodialysis patients.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2001;
16: 1387-1394.
25. Weil CM. Exploring hope in
patients with end stage renal disease on chronic hemodialysis.
Nephrol Nurs J 2000; 27: 219-
224.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com