You are here

Kadına yönelik şiddet sıklığı ve bunu etkileyen faktörler: iki sağlık ocağına müracaat eden kadınlarda yapılan bir çalışma

factors affecting this: a study on women who applied to two primary health care centers

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Gender-based violence is being increasingly recognized as a major public health concern and a violation of basic human rights. This is not only a social problem but also a significant burden on the public health. We have determined the frequency of and factors affecting the violence against women in Konya in this study. This descriptive study was carried out at two primary health care units selected randomly between 15th January and 15th February 2005. We evaluated domestic violence among 405 cases. Women were asked about their socio-demographic characteristics and experiences about violence. The median age of the respondents was 32.0 (15-77) years. Eighty four (20.7%) of the women experienced violence at least once in their life. Low economic position was a significant factor contributing to the increase in violence against women (p=0.004). Whilst low education levels of husbands (p=0.040) and mothers (p=0.002) and high numbers of sibling (p=0.032) were significantly associated with violence, the woman's own education level was not a significant factor (p=0.850). The following feelings were statistically significant among battered women: disappointment with marriage (p<0.001), suicide idea (p<0.001), leaving home (p<0.001) and feeling insecure (p<0.001). Consequently, low economic position, low education levels of husbands and mothers and high numbers of offspring have been found as risk factors among battered women.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Cinsiyete dayalı şiddet giderek artan bir hızda büyük bir halk sağlığı problemi ve insan haklarının ihlali olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu sadece sosyal bir problem değil, aynı zamanda toplum sağlığı açısından da önemli bir sorundur. Bu çalışmada Konya'da kadına yönelik şiddet sıklığı ve etkileyen faktörleri araştırdık. Tanımlayıcı tipte olan bu çalışma 15 Ocak-15 Şubat 2005 tarihlerinde randomize olarak seçilen 2 sağlık ocağında yapıldı. Aile içi şiddet 405 olguda değerlendirildi. Kadınlara sosyodemografik özellikleri ve şiddetle ilgili deneyimleri soruldu. Katılanların ortalama yaş değeri 32 (15-77) yıl idi. Kadınların 84'ü (%20.7) hayatları boyunca en az bir kez şiddete maruz kalmışlardı. Ekonomik seviyenin düşük olması kadına yönelik şiddeti artırıcı anlamlı bir faktördü (p=0.004). Eşlerin (p=0.040) ve annelerin (p=0.002) eğitim düzeyinin düşük olması ve kardeş sayısının fazlalığı (p=0.032) kadına karşı şiddette önemli iken, kadının kendi eğitim düzeyi anlamlı bir faktör değildi (p=0.850). Şiddete maruz kalan kadınlar arasında aşağıdaki duygulanımlar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı idi: evlilikten umduğunu bulamama (p<0.001), intihar düşüncesi (p<0.001), evi terk etme (p<0.001) ve kendini güvende hissetmeme (p<0.001). Sonuç olarak ekonomik durumun, eşlerin ve annelerin eğitim düzeyinin düşük olması ve çocuk sayısının fazlalığı şiddete maruz kalan kadınlarda risk faktörleri olarak bulundu.
110-116

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Bevan E, Higgins DJ. Is domestic violence learned? The
contribution of five forms of child maltreatment to men's
violence and adjustment. J Fam Violence 2002; 17: 223-
245.
2. Brown III RM. Development of family violence as a field
of study and contributors to family and community violence among low-income fathers. Agress Violent Behav
2002; 7: 499-511.
3. Booher TN, Lane JE, Davis LS. Domestic violence in the
outpatient setting. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 50: 262-265.
4. Fikree FF, Jafarey SN, Korejo R, Khan A, Durocher JM.
Pakistani obstetricians' recognition of and attitude
towards domestic violence screening. Int J Gynaecol
Obstet 2004; 87: 59-65.
5. Castro R, Peek-Asa C, Garcia L, Ruiz A, Kraus JF. Risks
for abuse against pregnant Hispanic women: Morelos,
Mexico and Los Angeles County, California. Am J Prev
Med 2003; 25: 25-32.
6. Gerbert B, Gansky SA, Tang JW, et al. Domestic violence
compared to other health risks: a survey of physicians'
beliefs and behaviors. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23: 82-90.
7. Bonomi AE, Thompson RS, Anderson M, et al. Intimate
partner violence, women's physical, mental, and social
functioning. Am J Prev Med 2006; 30: 447-457.
8. Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention. Lancet 2002; 359: 1423-1429.
9. Meit SS. Partner abuse. In: Rakel RE (ed). Texbook of
Family Practice. 6th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2002:
74-78.
10. Cunradi CB, Caetano R, Schafer J. Socioeconomic predictors of intimate partner violence among white, black,
and Hispanic couples in the United States. J Fam
Violence 2002; 17: 377-389.
11. Coker AL, Davis KE, Arias I, et al. Physical and mental
health effects of intimate partner violence for men and
women. Am J Prev Med 2002; 23: 260-268.
12. Falks-Stewart W, Golden J, Schumacher JA. Intimate
partner violence and substance use: a longitudinal day-today examination. Addict Behav 2003; 28: 1555-1574.
13. WHO. Violence against women: a priority health issue
(Family and Reproductive Health, World Health
Organisation, Geneva, 1997) Ref: Who/RFH/WHD97.8
Distr: General, Retrieved April 2005 from the World
Wide Web.
14. www.who.int/frh-whd/VAW/infopack/English/VAW_
infopack.htm. (Last accessed at 10.07.2007).
15. Mayda AS, Akkuþ D. Domestic violence against 116
Turkish housewives: a field study. Women Health 2004;
40: 95-108.
16. Mayda A, Büken B, Akkuþ D. Domestic violence against
women. Turk J Public Health 2003; 1: 47-48.
17. Jewkes R, Penn-Kekana L, Levin J. Risk factors for
domestic violence: findings from a South African crosssectional study. Soc Sci Med 2002; 55:1603-1617

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com