You are here

Home » Content

Transrektal ultrasonografi kılavuzluğunda yapılan prostat biyopsisinde anestezi şekli, hasta yaşı ve prostat hacminin ağrı üzerine etkisi

The effects of the type of anesthesia, age of the patient and prostate volume on the degree of pain perceived during prostate biopsy performed under transrectal ultrasonography guidance

Journal Name:

  • Gülhane Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Factors affecting the sense of pain perceived during prostate biopsy performed under transrectal ultrasonography guidance in patients with high prostate specific antigen level or abnormal digital rectal examination findings were investigated in this study. Four different types of anesthesia were performed on 210 patients in whom prostate biopsy was taken at our clinic. Topical anesthesia with perianal lidocaine cream, local block with perianal lidocaine injection, perianal lidocaine cream plus intrarectal lidocaine gel and perianal lidocaine cream plus anal dilation by finger were administered in Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Prostate volumes of the patients were measured by transrectal ultrasonography. Pain perceived during biopsy and placement of the transrectal ultrasonography probe into rectum was questionned by visual analog scale. Fifty, 80, 40 and 40 out of 210 patients comprised Groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Mean age of the groups was 62.70±9.15, 65.80±7.93, 63.11±8.32 and 62.70±8.48 years; mean prostate volume of the groups was 58.87±29.84, 56.69±28.91, 49.44±22.82 and 61.46±21.84 cc; mean prostate specific antigen level of the groups was 9.74±9.36, 12.0±15.05, 7.71±2.91 and 11.12±13.82 ng/ml, respectively, and no statistically significant differences were observed among the groups (p=0.157, p=0.458 and p=0.547, respectively). Pain perceived during the placement of transrectal ultrasonography probe into rectum was 0.60±0.88, 0.83±1.06, 0.22±0.44 and 0.58±0.84, respectively, and independent from the type of anesthesia (p=0.242). Pain perceived during biopsy was 1.39±0.94, 1.70±0.96, 2.22±1.39 and 1.51±0.99, respectively, and also independent from all four types of anesthesia (p=0.170). There was no correlation between prostate volume and age and pain score (p>0.05). According to our results, neither of four different types of anesthesia we performed during biopsy under the guidance of transrectal ultrasonography showed superiority to others regarding pain score. Age of the patient and prostate volume had also no effect on the pain score.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada prostat spesifik antijen yüksekliği veya parmakla rektal incelemede anormallik saptanan ve transrektal ultrasonografi eşliğinde biyopsi alınan hastalarda ağrı duyusuna etki eden faktörler araştırıldı. Kliniğimizde prostat biyopsisi alınan 210 hastaya işlem öncesi 4 farklı anestezi tekniği uygulandı. Birinci gruba perianal topikal lidokainle lokal anestezi, 2. gruba perianal infiltrasyonla lokal blok, 3. gruba perianal lokal lidokaine ilave intrarektal lidokain jel ve 4. gruba perianal lidokaine ilave parmakla anal dilatasyon uygulandı. Hastaların prostat hacimleri transrektal ultrasonografi ile ölçüldü. Vizüel analog skala kullanılarak biyopsi sırasında ve ultrasonografi probunun yerleştirilmesi sırasında oluşan ağrı duyusu sorgulandı. İki yüz on hastadan 50'si birinci grupta, 80'i ikinci grupta, 40'ı üçüncü grupta ve 40'ı da dördüncü grupta yer aldı. Grupların yaş ortalamaları sırasıyla 62.70±9.15, 65.80±7.93, 63.11±8.32 ve 62.70±8.48 yıl, prostat hacimleri sırasıyla 58.87±29.84, 56.69±28.91, 49.44±22.82 ve 61.46±21.84 cc, prostat spesifik antijen değerleri de sırasıyla 9.74±9.36, 12.0±15.05, 7.71±2.91 ve 11.12±13.82 ng/ml idi ve istatistiksel olarak birbirlerinden farklı değildi (sırasıyla p=0.157, p=0.458 ve p=0.547). Ultrasonografi probunun yerleştirilmesi esnasında duyulan ağrı skoru ortalamaları sırasıyla 0.60±0.88, 0.83±1.06, 0.22±0.44, 0.58±0.84 idi ve anestezi şeklinden bağımsızdı (p=0.242). Biyopsi alımı sırasında duyulan ağrı da sırasıyla 1.39±0.94, 1.70±0.96, 2.22±1.39, 1.51±0.99 olarak hesaplandı ve her dört anestezi şeklinden bağımsız olarak bulundu (p=0.170). Yaş ve prostat hacmi ile de ağrı skoru arasında korelasyon saptanmadı (p>0.05). Bizim sonuçlarımıza göre transrektal ultrasonografi eşliğinde biyopsi alınması sırasında uyguladığımız dört farklı anestezi şeklinden hiçbirisinin ağrı skoru açısından diğerlerine üstünlüğü gösterilememiştir. Hasta yaşı ve prostat hacminin de ağrı skoru üzerine etkisi bulunmamıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-transrektal-ultrasonografi-kilavuzlugunda-yapilan-prostat-biyopsisinde-anestezi-sekli-hasta-yasi-prostat-hacminin-agri-uzerine-etkisi.pdf
  • 2
78-83
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M, McKelvie GB. Multiple
transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic biopsies; true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 1993; 71: 460-
463.
2. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ, Peeling WB. Side
effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the
prostate. Clin Radiol 1993; 47: 125-126.
3. Seymour H, Perry MJ, Lee-Elliot C, Dundas D, Patel U.
Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate
biopsy. The advantages of periprostatic local anesthesia.
BJU Int 2001; 88: 540-544.
4. Walker AE, Schelvan C, Rockall AG, Rickards D, Kellett
MJ. Does pericapsular lignocaine reduce pain during transrectal ultrasonography guided biopsy of the prostate?
BJU Int 2002; 90: 883-886.
5. Djavan B, Remzi M, Marberger M. When to biopsy and
when to stop biopsying. Urol Clin North Am 2003; 30:
253-262.Cilt 50 · Sayý 2 · Gülhane TD TRUS biyopside aðrýyý etkileyen faktörler · 83
6. Irani J, Fournier F, Bon D, Gremmo E, Dore B, Aubert J.
Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy
of the prostate. Br J Urol 1997; 79: 608-610.
7. Roehl KA, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ. Robustness of free
prostate specific antigen measurements to reduce unnecessary biopsies in the 2.6-4.0 ng/ml range. J Urol 2002;
168: 922-925.
8. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5
region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for
diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157:
199-202.
9. Nova L, Montors F, Consanni P. Results of a prospective
randomized study comparing 6, 12 and 18 transrectal
ultrasound guided sextant biopsies in patients with elevated PSA, normal DRE and normal prostatic ultrasound. J
Urol 1997; 157 (Suppl): 59 (Abstract 226).
10. Chang SS, Alberts G, Wells N, Smith JA Jr, Cookson MS.
Intrarectal lidocaine during transrectal prostate biopsy:
results of a prospective double-blind randomized trial. J
Urol 2001; 166: 2178-2180.
11. Aus G, Hermansson CG, Hugosson J, Pedersen KV.
Transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complications and acceptance by patients. Br J Urol 1993; 71:
457-459.
12. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R, Shinohara K.
Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade
eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol
1996; 155: 607-609.
13. Alavi A, Soloway MS, Vaidya A, Lynne CM, Gheiler EL.
Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a
prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods. J
Urol 2001; 166: 1343-1345.
14. Wu CL, Carter HB, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA. Effect
of local anesthetics on patient recovery after transrectal
biopsy. Urology 2001; 57: 925-929.
15. Rabets JC, Jones JS, Patel AR, Zippe CD. Bupivacaine
provides rapid, effective periprostatic anaesthesia for transrectal prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2004; 93: 1216-1217.
16. Costello TG, Costello AJ. Anaesthesia for laser prostatectomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 1994; 22: 454-457.
17. Soloway MS, Obek C. Periprostatic local anesthesia
before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 2000;
163: 172-173.
18. Schostak M, Christoph F, Muller M, et al. Optimizing
local anesthesia during 10-core biopsy of the prostate.
Urology 2002; 60: 253-257.
19. Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T, et al. A randomized prospective
trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: the Emory University experience.
J Urol 2000; 164: 397-399.
20. Desgrandchamps F, Meria P, Irani J, Desgrippes A,
Teillac P, Le Duc A. The rectal administration of lidocaine gel and tolerance of transrectal ultrasonography
guided biopsy of the prostate: a prospective randomized
placebo controlled study. BJU Int 1999; 83: 1007-1009.
21. Lynn NN, Collins GN, Brown SC, O'Reilly PH.
Periprostatic nerve block gives better analgesia for prostatic biopsy. BJU Int 2002; 90: 424-426.
22. Haq A, Patel HR, Habib MR, Donaldson PJ, Parry JR.
Diclofenac suppository analgesia for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsies of the prostate: a double blind, randomized controlled trial. J Urol 2004; 171: 1489-1491.
23. Moinzadeh A, Mourtzinos A, Triaca V, Hamawy KJ. A
randomized double-blind prospective study evaluating
patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy
of the prostate using prebiopsy rofecoxib. Urology 2003;
62: 1054-1057.
24. Berger AP, Gozzi C, Steiner H, et al. Complication rate of
transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores. J Urol
2004; 171: 1478-1480.
25. Stewart CS, Leibovich BC, Weaver AL, Lieber MM.
Prostate cancer diagnosis using a saturation needle biopsy
technique after previous negative sextant biopsies. J Urol
2001; 166: 86-91.
26. Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain.
Pain 1976; 2: 175-177.
27. Taddio A, Stevens B, Craig K, et al. Efficacy and safety of
lidocaine-prilocaine cream for pain during circumcision.
N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 1197-1201.
28. Brekkan E, Ehrnebo M, Malmström PU, Norlen BJ,
Wirbrant A. A controlled study of low and high volume
anesthetic jelly as a lubricant and pain reliever during cystoscopy. J Urol 1991; 146: 24-27.
29. Renfer LG, Vaccaro JA, Kiesling V. Digital-directed transrectal core biopsy with spring-loaded biopsy device.
Urology 1991; 2: 161-162.
30. Hollabaugh RS, Dmochowski RR, Steiner MS.
Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincter. Urology
1997; 49: 426-434.
31. Klein EA, Zippe CD. Editorial: transrectal ultrasound
guided prostate biopsy ± defining a new standard. J Urol
2000; 163: 179-180.
32. Birch BR, Anson KM, Miller RA. Sedo-analgesia in urology. A safe, cost-effective alternative to general anesthesia.
A review of 1020 cases. Br J Urol 1990; 66: 342-350.
33. Rodriguez LV, Terris MK. Risks and complications of
transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsy: a
prospective study and review of the literature. J Urol
1998; 160: 2115-2120.
34. Ýnal G, Yazýcý S, Adsan O, Ozturk B, Kosan M, Cetinkaya
M. Effect of periprostatic nerve blockade before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on patient comfort:
a randomized placebo controlled study. Int J Urol 2004;
11: 148-151.
35. Obek C, Ozkan B, Tunc B, et al. Comparison of 3 methods of anaesthesia before transrectal prostate biopsy: a
prospective randomized trial. J Urol 2004; 172: 502-505.
36. Autorino R, De Sio M, Di Lorenzo G, at al. How to
decrease pain during transrectal ultrasound guided
prostate biopsy: a look at the literature. J Urol 2005; 174:
2091-2097.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com