You are here

Obtüratör ile entegre göz epitezi: iki olgu sunumu

Application of obturator integrated orbital prosthesis: pregentation of two cases

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Esthetics and retention are two features that need to be in the first place when fabricating a facial prosthesis. In patients with midfacial defects, a restoration with the combination of an obturator and facial prosthesis might be preferred. Although introduction of implant application presents a significant possibility for the retention of a facial prosthesis, challenges towards the limited use of implants direct the clinician to the utilization of magnetic retention. In this case report two similar cases with a facial prosthesis fabricated by the integration of orbital prosthesis and obturator via magnetic attachments are presented.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Yüz protezlerinde estetik ve tutuculuk her zaman ön plana çıkması gereken özelliklerdendir. Orta yüz defektli hastalarda obtüratör ve yüz protezi gibi iki farklı protezin kombine şekilde yapımı gerekebilir. Günümüzde yüz protezlerinin tutuculuğunda implantların kullanılması büyük bir imkan olmakla beraber, her olguda implant uygulanamaması klinisyeni diğer tutucu unsurlardan olan mıknatıslı tutuculara yönlendirmektedir. Benzer özelliklerde 2 olguyu içeren bu olgu sunumunda obtüratör ve orbital protezin mıknatısla entegre edilmesi anlatılmaktadır.
205-208

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Beumer JB, Curtis TA, Marunick MT. Maxillofacial
Rehabilitation: Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. St. Louis, Ishiyaku Euromerica. 1996: 417-449.
2. Lemon JC, Martin JW, Chambers MS, Wesley PJ.
Technique for magnet replacement in siliconofacial
prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 166-168.
3. Takahashi T, Fukuda M, Funaki K, Tanaka K. Magnetretained facial prosthesis combined with an implantsupported edentulous maxillary obturator: a case report.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 805-807.
4. Wolfaardt JF, Chandler HD, Smith BA. Mechanical
properties of a new facial prosthetic material. J Prosthet
Dent 1985; 53: 228-234.
5. Karayazgan B, Günay Y, Evliyaoğlu G. Improved edge
strength in a facial prosthesis by incorporation of tulle:
a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 526-529.
6. Thomas KT. Prosthetic rehabilitation. London:
Quintessence Publishing Co,1994: 69-77.
7. Hickey AJ, Salter M. Prosthodontic and psychological
factors in treating patients with congenital and
craniofacial defects. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 95: 392-396.
8. Nishimura RD, Roumanas E, Moy PK, Sugai T, Freymiller
EG. Osseointegrated implants and orbital defects: UCLA
experience. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 304-309.
9. Ciocca L, Gassino G, Scotti R. Home care maintenance
protocol for ear prostheses. Minerva Stomatol 2004; 53:
611-617.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com