You are here

Home » Content

“Dengeleme mi yoksa Sorumluluk Paylaşımı mı?” Avrupa Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası (AGSP) ile ilgili Belirsizliği Giderme

“Balancing or Burden Sharing?” Settling the Ambiguity around the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP)

Journal Name:

  • Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
One of the most interesting phenomena of the past decade in the field of international relations has been the gradual emergence of collective effort of 27 sovereign states to construct and implement a collective European Union (EU) security and defence policy (ESDP). The overall question that this study seeks to answer is that how could the emergence and rise of the ESDP be interpreted: as an act of burden sharing that seeks to support US-led defence initiatives in its neighbourhood in terms of finance of operations, military capabilities and personnel? Or as an act of balancing that is assumed by the traditional wisdom in the IR as the primary instinct of any state when faced with the greater power in its area of influence? Since the ESDP has emerged overwhelmingly as a series of empirical reactions to historical events, the ESDP as a variable can be traceable over the course of history. The positioning of the EU member states (specifically Germany, France and the UK) in critical junctures such as Afghanistan War under the guise of NATO, the Iraq War that have been carried out by the US-led “coalition of willing,” 2008 Russo-Georgian War and recent Libya Crisis would highlight the possible venues in the evolution of the ESDP. By picking these four cases, the aim of the study is to pinpoint the promises and pitfalls of the ESDP and the positioning of EU member states (specifically European trio) vis-àvis the US. Furthermore, this study hopes that these four cases could help provide sufficient insights to the evolution of the ESDP.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Uluslararası ilişkiler alanında son on yılın en ilginç olaylarından biri 27 egemen Avrupa ülkesinin savunma ve güvenlik alanında Avrupa Birliği Güvenlik ve Savunma Politikası (AGSP) adında ortak bir kimlik inşa etme çabasıdır. Bu çalışmanın cevap aradığı temel soru AGSP kimliğinin doğuşu ve evriminin nasıl yorumlanabileceğidir. Acaba, AGSP Avrupa mücaviri bölgede ABD’nin operatif askeri yeteneklerini özellikle finansman, askeri yetenekler ve kaynak temini alanlarında desteklemek maksadıyla bir “sorumluluk paylaşımı” stratejisi olarak mı yorumlanmalıdır? Yoksa AGSP geleneksel realist yaklaşım ışığında etki alanında ABD gibi “hegemonik” bir güçle karşı karşıya gelen bir grup devletin bu hegemonik gücü “dengeleme” stratejisi olarak mı kabul edilmelidir? AGSP tarihsel olaylara reaksiyon olarak kabul edilebilecek bir dizi adım olarak doğup geliştiğinden, bir değişken olarak AGSP’nin tarihsel bir analizle izi sürülebilir ve bir değişken olarak AGSP’nin evrimi tarih boyunca izlenebilir. Bu çalışmada, AGSP’nin Irak Savaşı, Afganistan Savaşı, 2008 Rus-Gürcü Savaşı ve son olarak Libya Krizi örnek olayları üzerinden AB üyesi devletlerin kendilerini konumlandırması (özellikle Almanya, Fransa ve İngiltere) ve bu konumlandırmaların AGSP’nin evrimine verdiği yön incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın temel amacı, AGSP’nin tarihi arka planı ile bu dört örnek olayın analizi üzerinden AB üyesi devletlerin (özellikle Almanya, Fransa ve İngiltere) ABD’ye göre kendilerini stratejik pozisyonlaması ile bu pozisyonlamaların AGSP’na etkilerini aydınlatarak, AGSP’nin evrimi konusunda yeterli bir akademik altyapı sağlamaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-dengeleme-mi-yoksa-sorumluluk-paylasimi-mi-avrupa-guvenlik-savunma-politikasi-agsp-ile-ilgili-belirsizligi-giderme.pdf
  • 18
103
143
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

ALBRIGHT Madeleine, 'The Right Balance Will Secure NATO's
Future', Financial Times, 7 December 1998.
ART Robert, “Western Europe Hedges its Bets”, Chapter in Paul J.J.
Wirtz and M. Fortman (eds), Balance of Power: Theory and Practice
in the 21st Century, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2004.
BEERES Robert and BOGERS Marion, “Ranking the Performance of
European Militaries”, Defence and Peace Economics, Volume
23, Issue 1, 2012.
BERENSKOETTER Felix and WILLIAMS M.J., Power in World
Politics, Abington, Routledge, 2007.
BROOKS Stephen G. and WOHLFORTH William C., “Hard Times for
Soft Balancing”, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1, Summer 2005.
DOVER Robert Britain, “Europe and Defense in the Post-Industrial
Age”, Defense & Security Analysis, Volume 27, Issue 1.
FLOCKHART Trine, “Me Tarzan-You Jane: The EU and NATO and
Reversal of Roles”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society,
Volume 12, Issue 3, 2011.
HOFFMAN Stanley, “Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation
State and the Case of Western Europe”, Daedalus, 1966, Vol. 95/2.
HOPF Ted, “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations
Theory”, International Security, Vol: 23 No: 1.
“Balancing or Burden Sharing?”
Settling the Ambiguity around the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP)
143
Güvenlik
Stratejileri
Yıl: 9
Sayı: 18
HOWORTH Jolyon, Security and Defence Policy in the European
Union, New York, Palgrave Macmillian, 2004.
HUNTER Robert E., The European Security and Defense Policy:
NATO’s Companion or Competitor?, Monterey, RAND Publication,
2002.
HUNTINGTON Samuel, “The Lonely Superpower” Foreign Affairs,
Vol. 70, No. 2, March/April 1999.
JERVIS Robert, “Neoliberalism and Cooperation: Understanding the
Debate”, International Security, vol: 24 No: 1.
KEOHANE Robert O. ve NYE Joseph, Power and Interdependence:
World Politics in Transition, Glenview, Foresman, 1989.
MASTANDUNO Michael, “The Strategy of Economic Engagement:
Theory and Practice” Book ed., Economic Interdependence and
International Conflict, Michigan, University of Michigan Press, 2003.
MEARSHEIMER John, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics,
New York, Norton, 2001.
MENON Anand, “Why ESDP is Misguided and Dangerous for the
Alliance?” in Jolyon Howorth ed. Defending Europe: the EU, NATO
and the Quest for European Autonomy, New York, Palgrave
Macmillian, 2003.
MENON Anand, “European Defense Policy From Lisbon to Libya”,
Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2011.
MORGENTHAU Hans J., Politics Among Nations, New York,
McGraw-Hill Inc, 1993.
NYE Joseph S., “Soft Power”, New York, Public Affairs, 2004.
POSEN Barry, “ESDP and the Structure of World Power”,
The International Spectator, 2004, Vol. XXXIX/1.
POSEN Barry, “The Unipolar Moment and ESDP”, draft, unpublished
paper given to Yale Seminar Series, November 2004.
SMITH Simon John, “EU–NATO cooperation: a case of institutional
fatigue?”, European Security, Volume: 20, Issue: 2, 2011.
SNYDER Jack, “One World, Many Theories”, Foreign Policy,
No: 145, November-December 2004.
Metin GÜRCAN
144
Security
Strategies
Year: 9
Issue: 18
TOJE Asle, “The EU as a Small Power”, Journal of Common Market
Studies, Volume: 49, Issue: 1, January 2011.
WALT Stephen, “The Ties that Fray: Why Europe and America Are
Drifting Apart” The National Interest, Winter, 1999.
WALT Stephen, “International Relations: One World, Many
Theories”, Foreign Policy, Spring 1998.
WALT Stephen, Taming American Power: The Global Response to
US Primacy, New York, Norton, 2005.
WENDT Alexander, “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social
Construction of Power Politics”, International Organizations, Vol. 46:2.
NATO Official Strategic Documents.
EU Official Strategic Documents.
Atlantic Community Official Documents.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com