You are here

The Interplay Between Historicism And Textualıty: Postmodern Hıstorıes

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This essay dea1swith the interrelatedmatrix of textua1ityand historicity in the problematic representations of history in various postmodern novels which came to be known as historiographic metafictions. it explicates the formallinking of history and fiction in the metafıctional discourses of such novels. Arguing that these novels highlightthenarrativenatureofhistoriography, theessay draws attentiontothe dialogic relationshipbetween the past and the present as the postmodern novel subverts and chal1enges the traditiona! understanding of history as Grand Narrative. References to the plots of several novels, such as Waterland, Famous Last Words, To Whom lt May Concem, The Blue Flower, andNewton's Niece, provide examples to the process of textua1izatİonof history and to the interestingpostmodern version of the past which raise the reader' s curiosity about what really happened in the past. The essay ends with the question of whether we can ever have a satisfactory answer to such a question, except for the reminder that fiction in the guise of history can be more truthrevealing than history itself as narrative.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale tarihyazımcı üst-kurmaca olarak adlandınlan postmodern romanlarıntarihinmetinselliğive metinlerintarihselliği arasındakiyakın ilişkiyi kullanaraktarihin yansıtıınını nasıl sorunsallaştırdıklarınıincelemektedir. Bu romanlarda görülen tarih ve kunnacanın biçimsel anlamda benzediğini tartışmaktadır.Postmodern romanm tarihyazımınıbir anlatı olarak ele alışını irdeleyen makale, bu tür romanlardageleneksel tarih anlayışının nasıl alaşağı edildiğini bu roman1arınsergilediği geçmiş ve şimdikizamanınyakın ilişkisini gözönünealarakincelemektedir.Böylece TarihBüyük-Anlatıolmaktançıkarılarak kunnaca özellikleri sergilenmiş olmaktadır. Waterland, Famous Last Words, ToWhomIt May Concem, TheBlue Flower, ve Newton's Niece gibiroman1arın olay örgülerineyapılan göndermeler, tarihinmetinselleşme sürecine, ve okura geçmişte gerçekte neler olduğu sorusunusordurantarihin ilginç postmodern anlatımlarınısergileyen postmodernromanada örnekoluşturmaktadır.Makale böyle bir soruyaverilebilecek herhangibir geçerli yanıt olupolmadığı sorusuyla sonuçlanır.Ancak, tarih görünümünebürünmüşkurmacanın bir anlatı olarak tarihtendahaçok doğruya yaklaştığınında altınıçizer.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
13-27

REFERENCES

References: 

Ankersınİt, F.R. (1995): "Statements, Texts and Pictures," in Ankersınİt and
Kellner (1995): 212-240.
Ankersmit, F.R. andKellner, hans (eds) (1995):ANew Philosophy of History.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ankersınİt,ER. (1997) "Historiography andPostmodernism," in Jenkins (ed)
(1997): 277-297.
Banville, John (1990,1976): Doctor Copemicus. London: Minerva.
Banville, John (1993,1981): Kepler. New York: Vintage.
Beaven, Derek (1995,1994): Newton's Niece. London: faber and faber.
Canary, Robert H. and Kozicki, Henry (eds) (1978): The Writing of History:
Literary Form and Historical Understanding. Madison: University
of Wisconsin Press.
Con Davis, Robert and Schleifer, Ronald (eds) (1994,1989): Contemporary
Literary Criticism: Literary and Cultural Studies.New York, London:
Longman.
24
n_ --
Doç.Dr. SerpilOPPERMANN
Culler, Jonathan (1989,1982): On Deconstruction: Theoryand Criticism after
Structuralism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Comell University Press.
Federman, Rayrnond (1990): To Whom It May Concem. Boulder: Fiction
Collective Two.
Findley, Timothy (1988,1981): F amous Last Words. Toronto, N. Y., London:
Penguin Books.
Fitzgerald, Penelope (1996, 1995): The Blue Flower. London: Flamingo.
Genovese, Elizabeth Fox (1997): "Literary Criticisrnandthe politics of the new
historicism," in Jenkins (ed) (1997): 84-88.
Greenblatt,Stephen(1994,1989): "Invisible Bullets," inCon Davis andSchleifer
(eds) (1994,1989) : 474-506.
Hutcheon,Linda (1989): "HistoriographicMetafıction:ParodyandIntertextuality
of History," in O'Donnel and Con Davis (1989): 3-32.
Hutcheon, Linda (1991,1989): ThePolitics of Postmodernism.London, N. Y.:
Routledge.
Jenkins, Keith (ed) (1997): The Postmodern History Reader. London, N.Y.:
Routledge.
LaCapra,Dominick(1983): RethinkingIntellectualHistory. Ithaca,N.Y.: Comell
University Press.
LaCapra, Dominick (1985): History and Criticism. Ithaca, N.Y.: Comell
University Press.
Mink, Louis O. (1978): "Narrative Form as Cognitive Instrument," in Canary
and Kozicki (1978): 129-149.
Montrose,Louis A. (1989): "Professing theRenaissance:The PoeticsandPolitics
of Culture," in Veeser (1989): 15-36.
O' Donnel, Patrick and Con Davis, Robert (eds) (1989): Intertextuality and
Contemporary American Fiction. Baltirnore,London: John Hopkins
University Press.
Spiegel, Gabrielle (1997): "History andPostmodernisrn,"in Jenkins (ed) (1997):
260-273.
25
----------------
The Interplay Between Historicism and Textuality: Postmodern Histories
Swift, Graham (1984, 1983): Waterland. London: Picador.
Veeser, Aram (1989): The New Historicism. New York, London: Routledge.
White,Hayden(1978): "The HistoricalText asLiterary Artifact," in Canary and
Kozicki (1978): 41-62.
White, Hayden (1986): "Historical Pluralism," Critical Inquiry 12, 3 :
480-493.
Zammito,John (1993): "Are We Being TheoreticalYet? The New Historicism,
theNew Philosophy of History, and 'Practicing Historians," Journal
of Modern History. 65,4: 783-814.
Zammito,John (1997): "Historicism,Metahistory,And HistoricalPractice: 'The
Historicization of the Historical Subject,'" ONLINE. INTERNET.
22.04.1997.
Available HTTP: file:///CVDocuments/Zammito. html.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com