You are here

Kırım Tatarlarının Ana Vatana Dönüşü ve Kültürel Canlanma Sürecinde Dil ve Eğitimi

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This article discusses the relationship between ethnic / national identity and language in the case of the Crimean Tatars who were deported from their homeland in 1944 and who obtained the right of return only in 1989. The main argument of this article based on the data of the field-work carried out in Crimea, is that the relationship between language and ethnic/national identity can be best understood if the symbolic and communicative dimensions of language, and the ethnic/national and cultural dimensions of identity are distinguished. Furthermore, the article analyses the role of National Schools within the cultural revival process following the return of the Crimean Tatars and emphasized the similarities with the period of Gasprinski.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale 1944 yılında ana vatanları Kırım'dan Orta Asya'ya sürülen ve vatana dönme haklarını ancak 1989 yılında elde eden Kırım Tatarları örneğinde etnik / milli kimlik- dil ilişkisini incelemektedir. Kırım'da gerçekleştirilen saha araştırması verilerine dayanan makalenin temel iddiası, dil-etnik / milli kimlik ilişkisinin, dilin sembolik ve etkileşimsel boyutlarının; kimliğin ise etnik /milli ve kültürel boyutlarının birbirinden ayrılması halinde anlaşılabileceğidir. Ayrıca, makalede, vatana dönüş sonrasında başlayan kültürel canlanma sürecinde Milli Mekteplerin rolü üzerinde durulmakta ve Gaspıralı dönemi ile söz konusu olan koşutluklar vurgulanmaktadır.
107-122

REFERENCES

References: 

Akarsu, Bedia. (1984). Wilhelm Von Humboldt'ta Dil-Kültür Bağlantısı. îstanbuİ: Remzi.
Barth, Fredrik. (1969). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries. Oslo: Johansen & Nielsen Boktrykkeri.
Cohen, Anthony P. (1985). The Symbolic Construction of Community. New York: Tavistock.
Cornell, Stephen ve Douglas Hartman. (1998). Ethnicity and Race:Making Identities in a Changing World. California, Pine Forge: Sage Publications.
Edwards, John. (1985). Language, Society and Identity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
121
Kırım Tatarlarının Ana Vatana Dönüşü ve Kültürel Canlanma Sürecinde Dil ve Eğitim
Fishman, J.A.. (1989). Language and Ethnicity in Minority Sociolinguistic Perspective. Cleve-
don:
Multilingua
l Matters. Fishman, J.A.. (1991). Reversing Language Shift. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Gans, Herbert. J.. (1979). "Symbolic Ethnicity: the Future of Ethnic Groups and Cultures in America", ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES. 2 (1) : 9-17. Gellner, Ernest. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell Hayruddinov M. A. ve S.M. Useyinov. (2001). Etiket Krımskih Tatar. Simferopol: Sonat.
Hirsch, Francine. (1997). "The Soviet Union as a Work-in-Progress: Ethnographers and the Category Nationality in the 1926,1937 and 1939 Censuses", SLAVIC REVIEW. 56 (2): 252-278.
Hobsbawm, Eric ve Terence Ranger (eds). (1983). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge-Cambridge University Press. Http://www .vatankirim.net/tataica.asp
Kırımlı, Hakan. (1996). Kırım Tatarlarında Milli Kimlik ve Milli Hareketler (1905-1916). Ankara: Türk Tarih Kurumu.
Kırımlı, Hakan. (2002). "Türk Dünyasını Silkeleyen Adam - Gaspıralı". EMELİMİZ KIRIM, 9¬10 (36-40): 24-29.
Nagel, John.
(1994)
. "Constructing Ethnicity: Creating and Recreating Ethnic Identity and Culture", SOCIAL PROBLEMS. 41(1): 152-175
Smith, Anthony D. (1981). The Ethnic Revival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, Anthony D. (1991). National Identity. London: Penguin Books.
Tishkov, Valery. (1997). Ethnicity, Nationalism and Conflict in and after the Soviet Union - The Mind Aflame. London: Sage Publications.
Williams, Brian Glynn. (2001). "The Ethnogenesis of the Crimean Tatars: An Historical Rein-terpretation", JRAS, Series 3: 329-348

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com