You are here

Home » Content

Arkadaş Grubuna Sahip Olmaya Verilen Önemin Gençlerin Vandalizmi Üzerindeki Etkisi

The Significance of Involvement with a Peer Group on Young People's Vandalism

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the relationship between young people's vandalism and the significance of their involvement with a peer group is analyzed. The significance of young people's involvement with a peer group is analyzed by the following variables: young people's involvement with a peer group, the significance they attribute to the involvement with a peer group, their frequency of getting together with the peer group, whether they are influenced by the thoughts and behaviors of their peer group, how important they find their peer group's activities, and ho w many activities they carry out with their peer group. As for young people's vandalism, giving damage to family, school and public properties is investigated. The study concludes that there is an important connection between the significance of involvement with a peer group and young people's vandalism. The importance young people attribute to the involvement with the peer group results in their efforts to sustain long-term relationships with their peer group. In this context, behaving in accordance with the peer group's wishes gains importance for young people, even if this involves vandalist behaviors.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çalışmada, gençlerin bir arkadaş grubuna sahip olmaya verdiği önemin vandalist davranışları (şişe kırma, aile mallarına zarar verme, okul mallarına zarar verme, kamu mallarına zarar verme, otobüs, sinema koltuklarını kesme, duvara yazı yazma-boyama, spor faaliyeti öncesi ve sonrasında mala zarar verme) üzerindeki etkisi incelenmektedir. Genç bireylerin bir saldırgan davranış biçimi olarak kabul edilen vandalist davranışlar sergileme durumu ile bu tür davranışlar sergilenmesinde gençlerin bir arkadaş grubuna ait olmalarına verdikleri önem (arkadaş grubuna sahip olma; arkadaş grubuna sahip olmayı önemli görme; arkadaş grubuyla geçirilen zaman sıklıkları; arkadaş grubunun düşünce ve davranışlarından ne kadar etkilendikleri; arkadaş grubunun faaliyetlerini ne kadar önemli buldukları; arkadaş grubuyla ne kadar ortak faaliyette bulundukları) arasında anlamlı ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Bu durum gençlik döneminde arkadaş grubunun önemini ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Gençlerin bir arkadaş grubuna sahip olmaları veya o gruba ait olmayı önemli görmeleri bir anlamda gruba ait olmayı sürekli kılma çabasını da beraberinde getirmektedir. Bu bağlamda, davranışlar vandalist davranışlar şeklinde de olsa, genç için grubun istediği şekilde davranmak anlamlılık kazanmaktadır. Arkadaş grubunun sürekliliğinin korunmasına ya da bir gruba ait olmaya önem verme arttıkça gençlerin bir saldırganlık türü olan vandalist davranışlar sergileme oranı da artış göstermektedir. Arkadaş gruplarına ait olmaya verilen önem gençlerin vandalizm gibi bazı sapmalara yönelmesinde etkilidir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-arkadas-grubuna-sahip-olmaya-verilen-onemin-genclerin-vandalizmi-uzerindeki-etkisi.pdf
  • 2
23-44
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Allen, V. I. (1984). Toward an understanding of the hedonic component of vandalism. (edit. J. Levy-
Laboyer).
Vandalism:
Behavior and motivation. (s. 77-89). London: Architectural Press. Anderson, S. (2007). The vandalism vandal, New York Magazine. 40(20). 32-108. Baker, T. E. ve Wolfer , L. The crime triangle: Alcohol, drug use, and vandalism, Police Practice
and Research. 4(1). 47-61. Barker, R.G. (1964). The ecological environment. (edit. R.G. Barker ve P.V. Gump). Big School-
Small School. Stanford: California: Stanford University Pres. Baughman, P. (1971). Vandalism and its prevention. Los Angeles: Association of School Business
Officials.
Burcu, E. (1998). Gençlik teorilerinin sınıflandırılmasına ilişkin bir çalışma. Sosyoloji
Araştırmaları Dergisi. 1(1-2).105-136 Burton, V. S., Cullen, F. T., Evans T. D. ve Dunaway, R.G. (1994), Reconsidering strain theory:
Operationalization, rival theories and adult criminality. Journal of Quantitative
Criminology. 35. 213-239.
Casserly, M. D.,
Bass
, A. S. ve Garrett J. R. (1982). School vandalism. Lexington MA: Lexington Books.
Ceccato,V. ve Haining, R. (2005). Assessing the geography of vandalism: Evidence from a
Swedish city. Urban Studies. 42(9). 1637-1656. Cohen, S. (1973). Property reduction: Motives and meanings. (edit. C.Ward). Vandalism. (s. 23¬53), New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. Cohen, S. (1984). Sociological approaches to vandalism. (edit. C. Levy-Leboyer) Vandalism:
Behavior and motivation. (8th ed.). Amsterdam: North Holland. Cordess, C. ve Turcan, M. (1993). Art vandalism. The British Journal of Criminology, 33. 95-102. Darley, J. M. ve Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of
responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 8. 377-383. Daun, A. (1982), Vandalism and communication, (edit. A. Daum), Self Interest and the Social
Environment. (s. 42-53). Falköping: Tiden. De More, S.W., Fisher, J. D. ve Baron, R. M. (1988), The Equity-control model as a predictor of
vandalism among college students. Journal of Applied Socal Psychology. 18(1). 80-91. DiCanio, M. E. G. (1993). Classroom violence, The Encyclopedia of violence: Origins, attitudes,
consequences. (s. 55-59). Facts on File, Inc. Ducey, M. (1978). Vandalism in high schools: An exploratory discussion. Chicago: Institute for
Juvenile Research.
Dunning, E.G. (1987). Working class violence in Great Britain, Recherche, 18(189). 798-803. Durmuş, E. ve Gürkan, U. (2005), Lise öğrencilerinin şiddet ve saldırganlık eğilimleri, Türk
Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi.
3(3). Dust, F.A. (1984). Solution to vandalism lies in developing sense of community. National
Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin. 68. 23-26. Esman, A. H. (1990). Culture as shaper of adolescence, (edit. A. H. Esman). Adolescence and
Culture. (s. 33-61). New York: Columbia Un. Press. Geller, E. S. (1992). Solving environmental problems: A behavior change perspective. (edit. S. Staub
ve P. Green). Psychology and Social Responsibility. New York: New York Un. Press. Goldstein, A. P. (1996). The psychology of vandalism, New York: Plenum Press. Gustafson, R. (1991). The connection between alcohol and aggression. Lund: BTJ Tryck. Harrison, A. (1976). Vandalism and depreciative behavior. (edit. G. Sharpe). Interpreting the
environment. (s. 75-91). New York: Karger Press. Heller, M. C. ve White M. A. (1975). Rates of teacher verbal approval and disapproval to higher
and lower ability classes, Journal of Educational Psychology. 67. 796-800. Horowitz T. ve Amir M. (1981). Violence in schools-patterns of coping by the educational
system. Israel: The Henrietta Szold Institute Publications. Horowitz T. ve Tobaly D. (2003). School vandalism: Individual and social context adolescence.
Adolescence. 38 (149). 131-139.
Korytnyk, N. X. ve Perkins D. V. (1983). Effect of alcohol versus expectancy for alcohol on the incidence of graffiti following an experimental task. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 92.
282-285.
Ley, D. ve Cybriwsky R. (1974). Urban graffiti as territorial markers. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 64. 491-505.
43
Arkadaş Grubuna Sahip Olmaya Verilen Önemin Gençlerin Vandalizmi Üzerindeki Etkisi
Mahoney, J. L. ve Stattin H. (2000). Leisure time activities and adolescent anti-social behavior: The Role of structure and social context , Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice. 18.
132-146.
Mawby, R. I. (1984). Vandalism and public perceptions of vandalism in contrasting residential areas, (edit. C. Levy-Leboyer). Vandalism: Behavior and motivations, (s. 235-246). Amsterdam: Elsevier
Moser, G. (1992). What is Vandalism? Toward a psycho-social definition and its implications. (edit. H. H. Christensen, D.R. Johnson, ve M. H. Brookes). Vandalism: Research, Prevention, and Social Policy. (s. 20-33). Portland: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
Nordmarker, A., Norlander T. ve Archer, T. (2000). The Effects of alcohol intake and induced frustration upon art vandalism, Social Behavior and Personality. 28(1). 15-28.
Nordmarker, A., Norlander T. ve Archer, T. (1998). Effects of flcohol and frustration on experimental graffiti, Scandinavion Journal of Psychology. 39. 201-207..
Öğülmüş, S. (1995). Tahripçilik. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(2). 578-592.
Öğülmüş, S. (1995). Vandalizm (tahripçilik) veya toplumda çevreye karşı bir manifesto. İlim ve
Sanat. 39. 76-79.
Öğülmüş, S. (1995). Okullarda (liselerde) şiddet ve saldırganlık. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim
Bilimleri Araştırma Raporu Öğülmüş, S. (2000). Tahripçilik (vandalizm): Düşük yoğunluklu bir sapma, Polis Bilimleri
Dergisi. 2(7-8). 73-86.
Perlgut, D. (1983). Vandalism: The environmental crime. Australian Journal of Social Issues.
18(3). 209-216.
Rice, P. F, (1990). The adolescent. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon Inc.
Roos, H. E. (1986). Vandalism in cities and on the countryside. Lund: Liber.
Tören Yücel M. (2003). Kriminoloji, Ankara: Başkent Matbaası.
Samdahl, D. M. ve Christensen H. H. (1985), Environmental cues and vandalism: An exploratory
study of picnic table carving. Environment and Behavior. 17(4). 445-458. Sampson, R. J ve Raudenbush S. W. (1999). Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new
look at disorder in urban neighbourhoods. American Journal of Sociology. 105. 603-651. Skogan, W. G. (1990), Disorder and decline. Crime and the spiral of decay in American
neighborhoods. New York: Free Press Smith L.M. ve Klein P. F (1971). The Adolescent and his society. (edit. H. D. Thornburg).
Contemporary Adolescence: Reading. (s. 183-191). California: Wandsworth Pub. Weinmayr, V. R. (1969). Vandalism by design: A critique. Landscape Architecture. 99. 286. Wells, L.E. (1978). Theories of deviance and self-concept. Social Psychology. 41(3). 189-204. West, R., Drummond, C., ve Eames K. (1990). Alcohol consumption, problem drinking and antisocial
behavior in a sample of college students. British Journal of Addiction. 85. 479-486. Wikström, P.H. (1991). Urban crime, criminals and victims: The Swedish experience in an Anglo-
American comparative perspective, Stokholm: Springer-Verlag. Yavuzer, Y. (1998). Niğde ilindeki ğğretmenlerin okul tahripçiliğine karşı ideolojik yönelimleri,
Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Zeisel, J.
(1977), Stopping school property damage. CEFP Journal. 15. 6-21. Zimbardo, P. (1970), The Human choice: Individuation, reason and other versus deindividuation,
impulse and chaos. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. 237-307.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com