You are here

Home » Content

Cinselliğe Yönelik Sosyal Kontrol: Türkiye’deki Genç Yetişkinlerde Cinsiyet ve Bölgesel Etkilerin Incelenmesi

The Social Control of Sexuality: An Examination of Gender and Regional Effects on Turkish Young Adults

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The main aim of the current study is to investigate the social control over sexuality in Turkish young adult sample. Social institutions, primarily the family, relatives, neighborhood, peer group and religion are the sources of control for sexual expression, and these social institutions may activate sanctioning systems when norms are violated. While societies differ remarkably in what they consider socially desirable and undesirable in terms of sexual behavior, regional differences in given society may have also effect on sexuality and consequently differ in what they attempt to prevent or promote. Thus, the present study investigates social controls over sexuality within the young adults (n= 218) in Turkish male and female sample (129 women and 89 men) in different regions (urban and rural cities). Data were collected through self-report questionnaires including Sexual Communication Scale, Parental Monitoring Scale, Perceived Religiosity and Social Control Scale and demographic informations. In general, results revealed that both gender and regional difference were important factors, which affects sexual behaviors of young people. While in the current study, social control mechanisms similar to other cultures, confirm gender differences in terms of students’ behaviors towards nonmarital sexuality, regional differences contribute further understanding within culture variation.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, ergen ve genç yetişkin örnekleminde cinselliğe yönelik sosyal kontrol kaynaklarını incelemektir. Temel olarak aile, yakınlar, mahalle, akran grubu ve dini yönelim cinsellik üzerinde sosyal kontrol mekanizmaları olarak işlev görür. Cinselliğin yaşama biçiminden kimlerle yaşanabileceğine kadar uzanan kurallar ve normlar toplum tarafından belirlenir. Toplumlar sosyal olarak beklenen ve beklenmeyen cinsel davranışlar açısından farklılık gösterse de, belirli bir toplum içinde bölgesel farklılıklar da vardır. Bu çalışma cinselliğe yönelik sosyal kontrol mekanizmalarını incelemeyi hedeflemiş ve bu doğrultuda Türkiye’nin farklı bölgelerinde (metropol ve taşra) yer alan üniversitelerden toplam 218 genç yetişkin (129 kadın ve 89 erkek) katılımcı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler Cinsel İletişimi Ölçeği, Ebeveyn Kontrolü Ölçeği, Algılanan Dindarlık ve Sosyal Kontrol Ölçeği ve demografik bilgiler de dahil olmak üzere öz-bildirim anket formu ile toplanmıştır.Sonuçlar genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde hem cinsiyetin hem de bölgesel farklılıkların cinsel davaranışı etkileyen önemli faktörler olduğu görülmüştür. Özelliklle evlilik öncesi cinselliğe yönelik tutumlarda sosyal kontrolün kadın üzerinde daha belirleyici olduğu ve bölgelere göre değişkenlik gösterdiği bulunmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-cinsellige-yonelik-sosyal-kontrol-turkiyedeki-genc-yetiskinlerde-cinsiyet-bolgesel-etkilerin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 1
87
106
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Ahmed, L. (2004). Arap Kültürü ve Kadınların Bedenlerinin Yazılışı. In P., Ilkkaracan (Ed.), Müslüman
Toplumlarda Kadın ve Cinsellik ( ss. 55-74). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Akgün, E. (2000). Predictors of adolescent sexual attitudes and behavior: the role of parents and best friends.
Unpublished master thesis. Ankara: METU
Askun, D. and Ataca, B. (2007). Sexuality related attitudes and behaviors of Turkish university students. Archieves
of Sexual Behavior; 36:741-752.
Capaldi, D.M., Crosby L., and Stoolmiller M.(1996). Predicting the timing of first sexual intercourse for at-risk
adolescent males. Child Development, 67:344–59.
Chatterjee S, Hadi AS (2006). Regression analysis by example. New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, pp 236
Chaurand, N. & Brauer, M. (2008). What Determines Social Control? People’s Reactions to Counternormative
Behaviors in Urban Environments. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38 (7), pp. 1689–1715.
Chekroun, P., & Brauer, M. (2002). The bystander effect and social control behavior: The effect of the presence
of others on people’s reactions to norm violation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 853–867.
Cindoglu, D. (2004). Modern Türk tıbbında bekaret testleri ve suni bekaret. In P. Ilkkaracan (Ed.), Müslüman
Toplumlarda Kadın ve Cinsellik (pp. 115-132). Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Cohen, S. (1994). Social control and the politics of reconstruction. In D. Nelken, (Ed.), The Futures of Criminology
(63-88). London: Sage Publications.
Costa, F.M., Jessor, R., and Donovan, J.E. (1995). Early initiation of sexual intercourse: The influence of
psychosocial unconventionality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 5(1), 93-121.
Davis, N. Y. (2007). Cinsiyet ve millet. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
DeLamater, J. (1981). The social control of sexuality. Annual Review of Sociology, 7: 263-290.
Dilorio, C., Kelley, M., and Hockenberry-Eaton, M. (1999). Communication about sexual issues: mothers, fathers,
and friends. Journal of Adolescent Health, 24, 181–189.
DiIorio, C., Pluhar, E., and Belcher, L. (2003). Parent-child communication about sexuality: A review of the
literature from 1980–2002. Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention & Education for Adolescents & Children,
5(3-4), 7-32.
Edgar-Smith, S.E., and Wozniak, R.H. (2010). Family relational values in the parent-adolescent relationship.
Counseling and Values, 54, 187-200.
Eşsizoğlu, A., Yasan, A., Yıldırım, E.A., Gürgen, F., and Özkan, M. (2011). Double Standard for Traditional Value
of Virginity and Premarital Sexuality in Turkey: A University Students Case. Women & Health, 51:136–150.
Gelbal, S., Duyan, V., and Öztürk, A.B. (2008). Gender differences in sexual information sources, and sexual
attitudes and behaviors of university students in Turkey. Social Behavior and Personality, 36(8): 1035-1052.
Jonason, P.K. and Marks, M.J. (2009). Common vs. Uncommon Sexual Acts: Evidence for the Sexual Double
Standard. Sex Roles, 60:357–365.
Handelsman, C.D., Cabral R.J., and Weisfeld G.E. (1987). Sources of information and adolescent sexual
knowledge and behavior. Journal of Adolescence Research, 2:455–63.
Higgins, L.T. and Sun, C. (2007). Gender, social background and sexual attitudes among Chinese students. Culture,
Health and Sexuality, 9(1): 31–42
106
The Social Control of Sexuality: An Examination of Gender and Regional Effects on Turkish Young Adults
Higgins, L. T., Zheng, M., Liu, Y., and Sun C. H. (2002). Attitudes to marriage and sexual behaviors: A survey of
gender and culture differences in China and United Kingdom.Sex Roles, 46, 75–89.
Horwitz, A. (1990) The logic of social control. London: Plenum Press, 1990.
Ilkkaracan, P. (2004). Müslüman Toplumlarda Kadın ve Cinsellik. In P., İlkkaracan, (Ed.), Müslüman Toplumlarda
Kadın ve Cinsellik ( ss. 11-32). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Imam, A. (2004). Müslüman dinsel sağ (“köktendinciler”) ve cinselik. In P., İlkkaracan, (Ed.), Müslüman
toplumlarda kadın ve cinsellik (pg. 75-98). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Jessor, R. (2014). Problem behavior theory. In Lerner, R.M., Petersen, A.C., Silbereisen, R.K., and Brooks-Gunn,
J. (Eds) The Developmental Science of Adolescence: History Through Autobiography , 239-256. New York:
Psychology Pres.
Kandiyoti, D. (2011). Cariyeler, bacılar, yurtttaşlar kimlikler ve toplumsal dönüşümler. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
Leland, N.L., and Barth R.P.(1993). Characteristics of adolescents who have attempted to avoid HIV and who
have communicated with parents about sex. Journal of Adolescence Research, 8:58–76.
Lyons, H., Giordano,P.C., Manning, W.D., and Longmore, M.A. (2011). Identity, Peer Relationships, and
Adolescent Girls’ Sexual Behavior:An Exploration of the Contemporary Double Standard. Journal Of Sex
Research, 48(5), 437–449.
Mahoney, E.R. (1980). Religiosity and sexual behavior among heterosexual college students. The Journal of Sex
Research, 16, 97-113.
Mayer, J. A. (1985). Notes towards a working defination of social control in historical analysis” In S. Cohen and
A. Scull, (Ed.), Social Control and state, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Mernissi, F. (2004). Bekaret ve ataerki. In P., İlkkaracan (Ed.), Müslüman toplumlarda kadın ve cinsellik ( ss. 99-
114). İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
Meschke, L.L., Bartholomae, S., and Zentall, S.R. (2002). Adolescent Sexuality and Parent-Adolescent Processes:
Promoting Healthy Teen Choices. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 264–279.
Miller, K.S., Forehand, R., and Kotchik, B.A. (1999). Adolescent sexual behavior in two ethnic minority samples:
The role of family variables. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 85-98.
Miller, B.C., McCoy, J.K., Olson, T.D., and Wallace, C.M. (1986). Parental discipline and control attempts in
relation to adolescent sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 48, 503–512.
Noller, P., and Callan, V.J. (1990). Adolescents’ perceptions of the nature of their communication with parents.
Journal of Youth Adolescence, 19, 349–362.
Scheerer, S. And Hess, H. (1997). Social control: a defence and reformulation. R. Bergalli, and C. Sumner, (Eds.),
Social Control and Political Order (pg. 96-130). London: Sage Publication.
Nugier, A., Niedenthal, P. M., Brauer, M., & Chekroun, P. (2007). Moral and angry emotions provoked by informal
social control. Cognition and Emotion, 21(8), 1699–1720.
Sumner, C. (1997). Social Control: the history and politics of a central concept in Anglo-American sociology. R.
Bergalli, and C. Sumner, (Eds.), Social Control and Political Order (pg. 1-33). London: Sage Publication.
Pluhar, E. Frongillo, E.A., Stycos, J.M. and Dempser-McClain, D. (1998). Understanding the relationship between
religion and the sexual attitudes and behaviors of college students. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy,
23, 288-296.
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations:
Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 271–320.
Rosenthal, D.A., and Feldman, S.S. (1999). The importance of importance: adolescents’ perceptions of parental
communication about sexuality. Journal of Adolescence, 22, 835–851.
Sidanius, J., Sinclair, S. & Pratto, F. (2006) Social Dominance Orientation, Gender, and Increasing Educational
Exposure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2006, 36, 7, pp. 1640–1653.
Sirman, N. (2006). Akrabalık, siyaset ve sevgi: Sömürge sonrası koşullarda namus - Türkiye örneği. In S. Mojab,
N. , Abdo (Ed.), Namus adına şiddet: Kuramsal ve siyasal yaklaşımlar (ss. 43-61). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi
Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Sprecher, S., and Hatfield, E. (1996). Premarital sexual standards among US college students: Comparison with
Russian and Japanese students. Archieves of Sexual Behavior, 25(3), 261-288.
Widmer, E.D.(1997). Influence of older siblings on initiation of sexual intercourse. Journal of Marriage and
Family, 59, 928–938.
Zaleski, E.H., and Schiaffino, K.M. (2000). Religiosity and sexual risk-taking behavior during the transition to
college. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 223-227.
Zhang, L., Li,X., Shah, I.H., Baldwin, W., and Stanton, B. (2007). Parent–adolescent sex communication in China.
The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 12(2), 138–147.
Zuo, X., Lou, C., Gao, E., Cheng, Y., Niu, H., and Zabin, L.S. (2012). Gender differences in adolescent sexual
permissiveness in three Asian cities: Effects of gender role attitudes. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50,
18-25.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com