You are here

Home » Content

ÖĞRETİM GÖREVLİSİ ARAŞTIRMACILAR: EYLEM ARAŞTIRMASINDA TEKNOLOJİ VE ETİK KONULARINA YÖNELİK DÜŞÜNCELERİ

TEACHER RESEARCHERS: TECHNOLOGY AND ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS WHILE CONDUCTING AN ACTION RESEARCH

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The research study stimulates critical approach to research and practice, with an increasing emphasis on ethics and ethical decision making of the teacher researchers within action research process by using technology in its process. The study investigates the impact of technology within the action research, ethical considerations and dilemmas while teacher researchers conduct educational research as critical friends within same academic institution. The research study was carried by eight participants in Educational Sciences Department who are teachers and at the same time experienced action research to develop teaching policy within their educational practices as researchers. This research has qualitative nature that focus groups, researcher observation and self-reports of the participants are relevant data collection techniques. The research study empowers that teacher researchers need to be reflective, proactive and critical friends among colleagues in each step of actions within educational practice by putting emphasis on technology and ethics
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
: Bu çalışma, araştırma ve uygulamaya eleştirel bir yaklaşımı temel alarak, eylem araştırması yaparken araştırmacı olarak rol üstlenen öğretim görevlilerinin teknoloji kullanımı ve etik konusunda karar alma sürecini dikkate almalarını vurgulamaktadır. Bir başka deyişle, bu çalışmada kendi kurumunda eylem araştırması yapan öğretim görevlilerinin teknoloji kullanma eğilimleri ve etik boyutuna karşı hassasiyetleri belirtilmiştir. Bu çalışma, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümünde görev yapan sekiz gönüllü öğretim görevlisinin katılımı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gönüllü katılımcılar, kendi kurumlarında eylem araştırması yapmakta, kendi kurumlarının gelişmesine bu yolla katkı koymaktadırlar. Nitel araştırma desenin kullanıldığı bu çalışmada, grup mülakatı, gözlem ve kişisel değerlendirme raporları aracılığı ile veri toplama süreci gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma, araştırmacı rol üstlenen öğretim görevlilerinin eylem araştırması gerçekleştirirken araştırmanın her sürecinde kurumun gelişmesi açışından meslektaşları için yansıtıcı, eleştirel olmaları gerektiğini ve teknoloji, etik konularında hassasiyet göstermeleri vurgulanmıştır
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ogretim-gorevlisi-arastirmacilar-eylem-arastirmasinda-teknoloji-etik-konularina-yonelik-dusunceleri.pdf
  • 1
84-95
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, N., Baskin, C. (2002). Can we leave it to change? New learning technologies and the problems of
professional competence. International Education Journal, 3(3), 126-137.
Bridges, D. (2001). The ethics of outsider research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(3). British Educational
Research Association. Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research (2004).
Bryman, A. (2004). Social research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cajas, F. (2000). Technology education research: Potential directions. Journal of Technology Education, 12(1), 1-91.
Campell, E. (2001). Let right be done: trying to put ethical standards into practice.
Journal of Education Policy, 16(5), 395-411.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2001). Research methods in education. London. RoutledgeFalmer.
Coulter, D. (2002). Creating common and uncommon worlds: using discourse ethics to decide public and private in
classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(1), 25-42.
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative & quantitative approaches. United Kingdom: SAGE.
Denzin, Lincoln (2003). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Gordon, E. (2000). Changes in technology, changes in education. Retrieved
October, 20, 2004, from http://lionhrtpub.com/orms/orms-10-00/education.html
Husu, J., Tirri, K. (2001). Teachers’ ethical choices in social settings. Journal of Moral Education, 30(4).
Lucas, K. B. & Lidstone, J. G. (2000). Ethical issues in teaching about research ethics. Evaluation and Research in
Education, 14(1).
Malone, S. (2003). Ethics at home: informed consent in your own backyard, Qualitative Studies in Education, 16(6),
797-815.
Marshall, C., Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Mills, G. E. (2003). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Ohio: Pearson Education.
Pitt, A. J. (1998). Qualifying resistance: some comments on methodological dilemmas. Qualitative Studies in Education,
11(4).
Pring, R. (2000). Philosophy of educational research. London: Biddles Ltd.
QISS (2004). Critical friend professional development program. Canterbury Christ Church University College.
Retrieved from http://www.qiss.org.uk/consultancy/crit-pdp/
Roblyer, M.D., & Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating educational technology into teaching. NewYork: Prentice Hall.
Schön, D. (1991). The reflective practitioner. Avebury: Ashgate Publishing.
Sumsion, J. (2000). Caring and empowerment: a teacher educator’s reflection on an ethical dilemma. Teaching in
Higher Education, 5(2).
Swaffield, S. (2002). Contextualizing the work of the critical friend. Paper presented at 15th International Congress for
School Effectiveness and Improvement (ICSEI), Copenhagen, 3rd – 6th January, 2002. Retrieved from
http://www.educ.cam.ac.uk/lfl/ICSEI/swaffield.pdf
Verma, G. K., Mallick, K. (1999). Researching education: perspectives and techniques. Britain: Falmer Press.
Wiener, J. (2001). Confidentiality and paradox: the location of ethical space. Journal of
Analytical Psychology, 46, 431-442

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com