You are here

Home » Content

KOPARMA TEKNiGiNiN BiVOMEKANiGi

BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS AND MODELLING OF SNATCH TECHNIQUE

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Snatch is a complex sports event in the Olympic weightlifting. The joint forces and moments not onlyplay an important role in the dynamics ofsuccessfullifting but theyare also related to sports injuries. In this study, the human body was modelled as a simplified rigid body. Three-Dimensional (30) joint forces were calculated during the snatch attempt. The snatch movement of 65 kg weights was captured by using four high-speed digital cameras. The ground reaction forces were also recorded byusing a synchronised force plate. The four camera views were processed by using Simi Motion software, and 3D spatial coordinates ofanthropometric points were obtained byutilising DLT algorithm. Thejoint forces and moments were calculated by utilising inverse dynamics into the rigid body model. The validity of the rigid body model was evaluated by comparing with calculated and measured ground reaction forces. In the calculations, the magnitude of the vertical ground reaction force was higher for the rigid body model compared to the measured values. Finally, the vertical ankle joint force was the largest in magnitude during lift. The shoulderjoint moments were also higher than the otherjoints. As a result, rigid bodymodelshows similarresults andrepresents the reallife.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Halterde koparma tekniği, dinamiği son derece karmaşık olan olimpik bir spor dendır. Koparma tekniğinde etkili olan eklem kuwetleri kaldmşm başansını etkilediği kadar spor yaralanmalarmm boyutunu ve görülme sıkllğmı da belirleyen dinamiklerdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, koparma tekniğinde eklemlerde etkili olan kuwetleri hesaplamak ve bu hesaplamalar için önerilen modelin geçerliğini test etmektir. Önerilen modelde insan vücudu silindirik katı cisim olarak kabul edilen sekiz üyeden otuşmekiedır. Bu üyeler, ayak, alt bacak, üst bacak, üst kol, ön koi ile gövde ve başm yansıdır. Çalışmaya bir elit halterci almdı. Haltercinin 65 kg koparma kaldmşmm görüntüsü dört adet sayısal kamera kullanılarak bilgisayar ortammda kaydedildi. Hareket analizi yazılımı (SIMI Motion) kullanılarak dört ayn kamera görüntüsü işlendi. Antropometrik noktalarm üç boyutlu kinematik verisi Doğrudan Doğrusal Dönüşüm algoritması ile hesaplandı. Vücut üyelerinin kütlesi ve üye kütle merkezi Clauser ve ark. (1969)'nm verisi kullanılarak hesaplandı. Serbest cisim diyagrammda tanımlanan ve kaldmş sıresınde etkili olan eklem kuwetleri görüntünün sayısallaştmlması sonucu elde edilen kinematik veriden Newton-Euler hareket denklemleri kullanılarak ters dinamik analiz ile üç boyutlu olarak hesaplandı. Modelin geçerliğini test etmek için gerekli olan yer tepki kuweti hareket analiz ile eşzamanlı olarak kuwet platformu kullanılarak ölçüldü. Koparma tekniği için oluşturulan katı cisim modelinden hesaplanan dikey yer tepki kuwetinin büyüklüğü kuwet platformu ile ölçülen dikey yer tepki kuwetinden daha fazla olduğu gözlemlendi. Model yardımıylahesaplanan yertepki kuwetleri ile koparma hareketi sıresınde ölçülen yer tepki kuwetleri karşılaştmldığmda davranışlarm benzerliği katı cisim modelinin geçerliğini gösterdi. Katı cisim modelinden hesaplanan yer tepki kuwetlerinin kabuller çerçevesinde koparma hareketini temsil ettiği ve dinamik modelin de geçerli biryaklaşım olduğusonucuna vanldı.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_152775_17_pp_124-142.pdf
  • 3
124-142
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Allard, PA, Stokes, I.A. & Blanchi, J.P. (1995). Three-Dimensional Ana¬lysis of Human Movement. Cham¬paign: Human Kinetics.
Bartonietz, K.E.(1996). Biomechanics of the snatch: Toward a higher training efficiency. NSCA, 18(3), 24-31.
Brown, E.W.&Abani,K.(1985). Kinematics and kinetics of the dead lift in adoles¬cent power lifters. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 17(5), 554-66.
Burdett, R.G. (1982). Biomechanics of the snatch technique of highly skilled and skilled weightlifters. Res Q Exerc Sport, 53(3), 193-197.
Enoka, R.M. (1979). The pull in Olympic weightlifting. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 11,131-37.
Enoka, R.M. (1988). Load and skill-related changes in segmental contributions to a weightlifting movement. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 20(2), 178-187.
Freivalds, A., Chaffin, D.B., Garg, A. &Lee, K.S. (1984). Adynamic biomechanical evaluation of lifting maximum accep-table loads. J Biomech, 17(4), 251 -62.
Garhammer, J. (1980). Power production by Olympic weightlifters. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 12(1), 54-60.
Garhammer, J. (1982). Energy flow during Olympic weightlifting. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 14(5), 353-360.
Garhammer, J. (1985). Biomechanical profile of Olympic weightlifters. Int J Sport Biomech, 1,122-30.
Garhammer, J.A. (1991). Comparison of maximal power outputs between elite male and female weightlifters in com-petition. Int J Sport Biomech, 7,3-11.
Garhammer, J. &Takano, B. (1992). Train¬ing for weightlifting. In Paavo. Komi (Ed) Strength and Power in Sport, (pp. 502-516). Oxford: Blackwell Sci¬entific Publ.
Garhammer, J., Kauhanen, H. & Hakkinn, K.A. (2002). Comparison of perfor-mances by woman at the 1987 and 1998 world weightlifting champion¬ships. Science for Success Cong¬ress. Jyvaskyla, Finland. 2-40ctober.
Gourgoulis, V., Aggelousis, N., Mavromatis,G.&Garas, A. (2 000). Three-dimensional kinematic analy¬sis of the snatch of elite Greek weight-lifters. J Sport Sci, 18,643-52.
Gourgoulis, V., Aggeloussis, N., Antoniou, P., Christoforidis, C, Mavromatis.G.

& Garas, A. (2002). Comparative 3-Dimensional kinematic analysis of the snatch technique in elite male and female Greek weightlifters. J Strength Cond Res, 16(3), 359-66.
Gourgoulis, V., Aggeloussis, N., Kalivas, V., Antoniou, P. & Mavromatis, G. (2004). Snatch lift kinematics and bar energetics in male adolescent and adult weightlifters. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 44,126-31,
Gruber, K., Ruder, H., Denoth, J. & Schneider, K. (1998). A comparative study of impact dynamics: wobbling mass model versus rigid body mo¬dels. J Biomech, 31,439-444.
Harbili, E. & Arıtan S. (2005). Elit halter¬cilerde koparma tekniğinin karşılaş¬tırmalı biyomekanik analizi. Spor Bi¬limleri Dergisi, 16(3), 124-34.
Isaka, T., Okada, J. & Funato, K. (1996). Kinematics analysis of the barbell during the snatch movement of elite Asian weightlifters. Int J Sport Bio-mech, 12,508-516.
Liu W. & Nigg, B.M. (2000). A mechanical model to determine the influence of masses and mass distribution on the impact force during running. J Bio-mech, 33,219-224.
Nigg, B.M. & Liu W. (1999). The effect of muscle stiffness and damping on si-mulated impact force peaks during running. J Biomech, 32,849-856.
Pain M.T.G. & Challis, J.H. (2006). The influence of soft tissue movement on ground reaction forces, joint torques and joint reaction forces in drop land-ings. J Biomech, 39,119-124.
Schilling, B.K., Stone, M.H., O'Braynt, H.S., Fry A.C., Coglianese, R.H. & Pierce, K.C. (2002). Snatch technique of collegiate national level weight-lifters. J Strength Cond Res, 16(4), 551-555.
Souza, A.L., Shımada, S.D. & Koontz, A.
(2002). Ground reaction forces dur¬ing the power clean. J Strength Cond Res, 16(3), 423-427.
Turner, İ. A. (2005). Dikey Sıçramanın Üç Boyutlu BiyomekanikAnalizinde Ens-trümantasyon. Yayınlanmamış yük¬sek lisans tezi. Hacettepe Üniver-sitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Wilson C, King, M .A. & Yeadon, M.R. (2006). Determination of subject spe¬cific model parameters for viscoelas-tic elements. J Biomech, 39, 1883 -1890.
Winter, D.A. (2005). Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Move¬ment. N.Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc. deZee, M., Dalstra, M.,Cattaneo, P.M.,Rasmussen, J., Svensson, P., Melsen, B. (2007). Validation of a musculoskeletal model of the mandible and Its application to mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Biomech, 40(6), 1192-201.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com