You are here

Home » Content

Üçlü Motivasyonel İklim Ölçeğinin Ortaöğretim Öğrencileri için Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Validity and Reliability of Trichotomous Motivational Climate Scale in High School Students

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2009

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to determine the reliability and the validity of Trichotomous Motivational Climate Scale for high school students. Participants consisted of 829 girl, 776 boy and totally 1605 (X Age=15.67±1.19) high school students attending three public schools in central district of Ankara. Trichotomous Motivational Climate Scale was developed by Bülent Agbuga and Ping Xiang in 2008 by gathering items adapted from Duda and Nicholls (1992), Elliot (1999), and Elliot and Church (1997). Trichotomous Motivational Climate Scale consists of 29 items and each item was rated on a 7-point scale. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factorial validity of the scale and it was found that factor load of 4th item was under 0.35. After taking this item out an exploratory factor analysis was done to 28-item scale. The analysis yielded three factors with an eigenvalue greater than 1.00, accounting for 44.73% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis results indicated there were three distinct factors represented in the data set. All indices (GFI = .91, AGFI= .95, NFI = .91 CFI = .92, SRMR = 0.049, RMSEA = .072) represent an acceptable fit between the three-factor model and the data. Cronbach Alpha values were determined for whole scale 0.87, for mastery climate subscale 0.71, for performance approach climate subscale 0.74 and for performance avoidance climate subscale 0.74. These findings suggest that Trichotomous Motivational Climate Scale is reliable and valid
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Üçlü Motivasyonel İklim Ölçeğinin ortaöğretim öğrencileri için geçerlik ve güvenirliğini saptanmaktır. Araştırmaya, Ankara ili merkez ilçedeki üç farklı ortaöğretim kurumunda öğrenim gören 829 kız ve 776 erkek olmak üzere toplam 1605 (X Yaş=15.67±1.19) öğrenci gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Motivasyonel İklim Ölçeği, Bülent Agbuga ve Ping Xiang tarafından 2008 yılında; Duda ve Nicholls (1992), Elliot (1999) ve Elliot ve Church (1997) tarafından geliştirilen ölçeklerden alınan maddelerle oluşturulmuştur. Yirmi dokuz maddeden oluşan Üçlü Motivasyonel İklim Ölçeği 7’li derecelendirmeye sahip Likert tipi bir ölçektir. Ölçeğin faktör yapısını belirlemek amacı ile ölçekten elde edilen veriler faktör analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi sonrası, 4. maddenin faktör yük değerinin 0.35’in altında olduğu görülmüş ve uzman görüşü sonrası bu maddenin ölçekten çıkarılarak kalan 28 madde için faktör analizinin tekrar yapılmasına karar verilmiştir. Varimax döndürme tekniği ile elde edilen özdeğeri 1.00’den büyük üç faktör ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu üç fakbetör, toplam değişkenliğin % 44.73’ünü açıklamaktadır. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre tüm değerlerin (GFI = .91, AGFI = .95, NFI = .91, CFI = .92, SRMR = 0.049, RMSEA = .072) üç faktörlü yapıda kabul edilebilir bir uygunluk gösterdiği ortaya konmuştur. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılığını belirlemede kullanılan Cronbach Alfa değerleri ölçeğin geneli için 0.87; ustalık alt boyutu için 0.71; performans yaklaşımı alt boyutu için 0.74 ve performans kaçınımı alt boyutu için 0.74 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen güvenirlik katsayıları ölçeğin yüksek güvenirliğe sahip olduğunu göstermektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_152775_20_pp_6-15.pdf
  • 1
6-15
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Agbuga B, Xiang P. (2005). Gender Differences Among Turkish High School Students in Physical Education: An Achievement Goal Theory Approach; Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport (SCI), 75 (1), (Supplement), A-5.
2. Agbuga B, Xiang P. (2008). Achievement goals and their relations to self-reported persistence/effort in secondary physical education: A trichotomous achievement goal framework. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 179-191.
3. Alpar R. (2001). Spor Bilimlerinde Uygulamalı İstatistik. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
4. Ames C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84: 261–271.
5. Ames C, Archer J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: students’ learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
6. Barkoukis V, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Ntoumanis N, Nikitaras N. (2007). Achievement goals in physical education: examining the predictive ability of five different dimensions of motivational climate. European Physical Education Review, 13, 267-285.
7. Barnes JK, Page A, McKenna J. (1997). Goal orientation and motivational climate of international rowers during training and competition seasons. Journal of Sport Science, 15, 70-71.
8. Büyüköztürk Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, (32), 470-483.
9. Cury F, Da Fonseca D, Rufo M, Peres C, Sarrazin P. (2003). The trichotomous model and investment in learning to prepare for a sport test: A mediational analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 529-543.
10. Duda JL. (1993). Goals: A social-cognitive approach to the study of achievement motivation in sport. (RN Singer, M Murphey, LK Tennant, Ed.), Handbook of Research on Sport Psychology. New York: Macmillan. s. 421–36.
11. Duda JL, Nicholls J. (1992). Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 290-299.
12. Dweck CS, Leggett EL. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
13. Elliot AJ, Harackiewiczv JM. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475.
14. Elliot AJ. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation:
Üçlü Motivasyonel İklim Ölçeği Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması 15
A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. (ML Maehs, PR Pintrich, Ed.), Advances In Motivation And Achievement Greenwich, CT: JAI Press s. 243-279.
15. Elliot AJ. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189.
16. Elliot AJ, Church MA. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218-232.
17. Field A. (2000). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: Advanced Techniques for the Beginner. London: Sage.
18. Fincham FD, Hokoda A, Sanders R Jr. (1989). Learned helplessness, test anxiety, and academic achievement: A longitudinal analysis (Elektronik Sürümü). Child Development, 60, 138–145.
19. Frias CM, Dixon RA. (2005). Confirmatory factor structure and measurement invariance of the memory compensation questionniare. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 168-178.
20. Hair J, Black B, Babin B, Anderson R, Tathan R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6ncı Baskı) New York: Prentice Hall.
21. Howard EA, Tinsley D. (1987). Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(4), 414-434.
22. Hu L, Bentler PM. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, (6), 1-55.
23. Jaakkola T, Digelidis N. (2007). Establishing a positive motivational climate in physical education. (J Liukkonen, YV Auweele, D Alfermann, Y Theodorakis, Ed.), Psychology for Physical Educators, Student In Focus (s.4-16). (2nci Baskı). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
24. Jöreskog K, Sörbom D. (1993) Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. USA: Scientific Software International.
25. Kahn JH. (2006). Factor analysis in counseling psychology research, training and practice: Principles, advanes and application. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34(5)684-718.
26. Kalaycı Ş. (2006). Faktör Analizi. SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. (Ş Kalaycı, Ed.), Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım LTD. ŞTİ.
27. Kavussanu M, Roberts GC. (1996). Motivation in physical activity contexts: The relationship of perceived motivational climate to intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(3), 264–280.
28. Kline P. (1994) An Easy Guide To Factor Analysis. London: Routledge.
29. Kline RB. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2inci Baskı) New York: Guilford Press.
30. McDonald RP, Ho RM. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
31. Mishel MH. (1998). Methodological Studies: Instrument Development. (PJ Brink, MJ Wood, Ed.), Advanced Design in Nursing Research, (2inci baskı), (s. 235-286). New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
32. Nicholls JG. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346.
33. Nicholls JG. (1989). The Competitive Ethos And Democratic Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. Papaioannou A. (1994). Development of a questionnaire to measure achievement orientations in physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 11-20.
35. Scherer RF. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: Factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Report, 62, 76-77.
36. Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H, Müller H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.
37. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. (2004). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, (2inci Baskı) New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, .
38. Seifritz JJ, Duda JL, Chi L. (1992) The relationship of perceived motivational climate to intrinsic motivation and beliefs about success in basketball. Journal of Sport Exercise Psychology, 14, 375-91.
39. Şimşek ÖF. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş. Ankara: Ekinoks, .
40. Tezbaşaran AA. (1996). Likert Tipi Ölçek Geliştirme Kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
41. Thompson B. (2000). Ten commandments of structural equation modeling. (L Grim, P Yarnold, Ed.), Reading and Understanding More Multivariate Statistics (s. 261-284). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
42. Toros T. (2001). Elit ve Elit Olmayan Erkek Basketbolcularda Hedef Yönelimi, Güdüsel (Motivasyonel) İklim ve Hedeflerin Özgünlük, Güçlük Derecesi Özelliklerinin Yaşam Doyumuna Etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi. Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
43. Treasure DC, Roberts GC. (1998). Relationship between female adolescents’ achievement goal orientations, perceptions of the motivational climate, beliefs about success and sources of satisfaction in basketball. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 29, 211-230.
44. Walling ML, Duda JL, Chi L. (1993). The perceived motivational climate in sport questionnaire: construct and predictive validity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 172-183.
45. Xiang P, Lee A. (2002). Achievement goals, perceived motivational climate, and students’ self-reported mastery behaviors. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73, 58–65.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com