You are here

Sporda Homofobi: Erkek ve Kadın Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Eşcinsel Sporculara Karşı Tutumlarının Karşılaştırılması

Homophobia in Sports: Comparison of Male and Female University Students’ Attitudes Toward Homosexual Athletes

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to compare the attitudes of male and female university students toward homosexual athletes. The participants of the study were three hundred sixteen male (Mage = 22.59, SD = 1.30) and two hundred fifty one female (Mage = 21.80, SD = 1.35) studying at Middle East Technical University. Turkish version of “Homophobia in Sports Scale” was used to collect data. Chi-square analysis was used to analyze the data. Results of the analysis demonstrated a significant difference between male and female students’ attitudes towards male athletes who revealed that he was homosexual, but demonstrated a non significant difference towards female athletes who revealed that she was lesbian. Additionally, no significant difference is found between male and female students in terms of other sports fans’ opinions toward the homosexual athletes. A significant difference is also found between male and female students’ opinions of fans positive attitudes/acceptance level towards homosexual athletes in various sports branches including auto racing, golf, track and field, swimming, gymnastics, figure skating, and tennis. Lastly, results demonstrated a significant difference between male and female students in terms of negative labels used to describe homosexual athletes such as “perverted” and stupid”. In conclusion, male and female students demonstrated positive feelings towards homosexual athletes, but they also have negative feelings in some parameters of the Homophobia in Sports Scale.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı erkek ve kadın üniversite öğrencilerinin eşcinsel sporculara karşı tutumlarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Çalışmanın örneklemini Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi’nde öğrenim gören 316 genç erkek (x yaş = 22.59, SS = 1.30) ve 251 genç kadın (xyaş = 21.80, SS = 1.35) öğrenci oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada veri toplamak amacı ile “Sporda Homofobi Ölçeği”nin Türkçe biçimi kullanılmıştır. Erkek ve kadın öğrencilerin tutumları arasında bir fark olup olmadığının belirlenmesi amacı ile ki-kare uygunluk testi uygulanmıştır. İstatistiksel olarak anlamlılık değeri p<.05 olarak kabul edilmiştir. Araştırmaya katılan erkek ve kadın öğrencilerin verdikleri yanıtlarda eşcinsel olduğunu açıklayan erkek sporcuya karşı düşüncelerinde fark bulunmasına rağmen, kadın sporcuya karşı olan düşüncelerinde bir fark bulunmamıştır. Ayrıca, diğer spor taraftarlarının eşcinsel olduğunu açıklayan sporcuya karşı olan düşünceleri konusunda da erkek ve kadın öğrenciler arasında bir fark bulunmamıştır. Erkek ve kadın öğrencilerin spor dallarına göre cinsel tercihini açıklayan sporcuya karşı taraftarların kabul edicilik düzeylerine yönelik fikirlerinde araba yarışı, golf, atlebitizm, yüzme, cimnastik, buz pateni ve tenis dallarında fark bulunmuştur. Son olarak da eşcinsel olduğunu açıklayan sporcuya karşı öğrencilerin kullandıkları olumlu ve olumsuz sıfatlarla ilgili verilerin analiz sonuçlarında erkek ve kadın öğrencilerin olumlu sıfatlar konusunda farklı düşünmedikleri, ancak “sapık” ve “aptal” sıfatlarında fark gösterdikleri ortaya konmuştur. Sonuç olarak bu çalışmada erkek ve kadın öğrencilerin Sporda Homofobi Ölçeği kapsamında eşcinsel sporculara karşı düşüncelerinin olumlu bulunmasına karşın, bazı parametrelerde olumsuz fikirlerinin de olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır.
104-116

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Altemeyer B. (2001). Changes in attitudes toward
homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(2), 63-75.
2. American Psychological Association. (2008). Answers
to your questions: For a better understanding of sexual
orientation and homosexuality. Washington, DC: Author. 3
Şubat 2009, http://www.apa.org/topics/sorientation.pdf
3. APA Help Center (2009). Sexual orientation
and homosexuality. 15 Ocak 2009, http://www.
apahelpcenter.org/articles/pdf.php?id=31
4. Buzinski J. (2008). In Beijing Olympics, only 10 openly
gay athletes. 03 Ocak 2009, http://www.outsports.com/
os/index.php/component/content/article/35-2008/111-
in-beijing-olympics-only-10-openly-gay-athlet
5. Conger JJ. (1975). Proceedings of the American
Psychological Association, Incorporated, for the year
1974: Minutes of the annual meeting of the Council of
Representatives. American Psychologist, 30, 620–651.
6. Çırakoğlu OC. (2006). Perception of homosexuality
among Turkish university students: The roles of
labels, gender, and prior contact. The Journal of Social
Psychology, 146(3), 293-305.
7. Davison KG, Frank BW. (2007). Sexualities, Genders,
and Bodies in Sport: Changing Practices of Inequity.
(K Young, P White, Eds.), Sport and Gender in Canada
(2nd ed.), (s. 178-193). New York, NY; Don Mills, Ontario:
Oxford University Press.
8. Declaration of Montreal (2006). International
Conference on LGBT Human Rights of the 1st World
Outgames on the 29th of July 2006.
9. Demers G. (2006). Homophobia in sport-Fact of
life, taboo subject. Canadian Journal for Women in
Coaching. April 2006, Vol. 6, No.2. 09 Şubat 2008,
http://www.coach.ca/WOMEN/e/journal/apr2006/
April2006.pdf
10. Eitzen DS. (2000). “Social Control and Sport”, em J.
Coakley e E. Dunning (eds), Handbook of Sports Studies,
London, Sage, pp. 370–381.
11. EGLSF (European Gay and Lesbian Sport Federation).
(1999). 12 Şubat 2009, http://www.eglsf.info/
12. FGG (Federation of Gay Games) (1999). 08 Mart 2009,
http://www.gaygames.com/en/.
13. Furnham A, Saito K. (2009). A cross-cultural study of
attitudes toward and beliefs about, male homosexuality.
Journal of Homosexuality, 56(3):299-318.
14. Gelbal S, Duyan V. (2006). Attitudes of university
students toward lesbians and gay men in Turkey. Sex
Roles, 55, 573-579.
15. Griffin P. (1998). Strong Women, Deep Closets –
Lesbians and Homophobia in Sport. Champaign, IL,
Human Kinetics.
16. Hooker E. (1957). The adjustment of the male overt
homosexual. Journal of Projective Techniques, 21, 18–31.
17. Lippincott JA, Wlazelek B, Schumacher LJ.
(2000). Comparison: attitudes toward homosexuality
of international and American college students.
Psychological Reports, 87, 1053-6.
18. Oksal A. (2008). Turkish family members’ attitudes
toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 58, 514–525.
116 Saraç, Ebem Rahim
19. Pratte T. (1993). A comparative study of attitudes
toward homosexuality: 1986 and 1991. Journal of
Homosexuality, 26(1), 77-83.
20. Sakallı N. (2002). The relationship between sexism and
attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish
college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 42 (3), 51–
62.
21. Sakallı N, Uğurlu O. (2001). Effects of social contact
with homosexuals on heterosexual Turkish university
students’ attitudes towards homosexuality. Journal of
Homosexuality, 42(1), 53–62.
22. Saraç L. (2006). Fans attitudes toward homosexual
athletes. 9th International Sports Sciences Congress,
3-5 November, Muğla.
23. The Independent (2009). Gay referee gets red card in
Turkey. Thursday, 25 June 2009. 22 Eylül 2009, http://
www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/gayreferee-
gets-redcard- in-turkey-1718056.html
24. Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by
General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December
1948.
25. Walther T. (2006). Kick it Out: Homophobia in Football.
European Gay and Lesbian Sport Federation (EGLSF).
22 Şubat 2007, http://www.farenet.org/resources/
EGLSF_Homophobia_in_Football_2006.pdf
26. Weishut DJ. (2000). Attitudes toward homosexuality:
an overview. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related
Sciences, 37(4), 308-19.
27. Witeck-Combs Communications, Inc./Harris Interactive,
WC/HI. (2002). Americans may be more accepting of gay
athletes than even they suspect. 06 Şubat 2006, http://
www.witeckcombs.com/news/releases/20020819_
accepting.pdf.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com