You are here

Home » Content

Sürekli Optimal Performans Duygu Durumu ve Egzersiz Davranışı

Dispositional Flow State and Exercise Behavior

Journal Name:

  • Hacettepe Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study was to examine dispositional flow of Turkish participants in terms of sex and some exercise behavior variables (frequency, type, length and level of activity involvement). The sample of this study constituted 74 female (Mage=23.56; Sd=4.06) and 160 male (Mage=24.15; Sd=6.18) participants from variety of exercise programs. A demographic questionnaire was used to obtain information about their age, gender, frequency, length and type of exercise while Dispositional Flow tendencies of participants in exercise environment were determined by Dispositional Flow Scale-2 (DFS-2). MANOVA was conducted to test differences in dispositional flow states with regard to gender and exercise behaviors. MANOVA results revealed no significant differences in dispositional flow between males and females (p>0.01). MANOVA results also indicated overall significant main effects for frequency (Hotelling’s T2 = 0.14; F (9,186) = 2.94; p<0.01), for length (Hotelling’s T2 = 0.15; F (9,181) = 2.95; p<0.01), and for types of exercise (Hotelling’s T2 = 0.12; F (9,178) = 2.44; p<0.01) on dispositional flow. The frequency, length and type of exercise have an contribution to concentration, cognitive competence, control and more intrinsic enjoyment of exercise participants.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürekli optimal performans duygu durumunun cinsiyete ve egzersiz davranışı parametrelerine (sıklık, tür, süre) göre incelenmesidir. Çalışmaya, farklı egzersiz programlarına katılan 74 kadın (X yaş=23.56; Ss=4.06) ve 160 erkek (X yaş=24.15; Ss=6.18) gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Katılımcıların sürekli optimal performans duygu durumları “Sürekli Optimal Performans Duygu Durum Ölçeği- 2 (SOPDDÖ-2)” ile belirlenirken, yaş, cinsiyet, egzersiz sıklığı, egzersiz yapma süresi ve egzersiz türü bilgileri için “Kişisel Bilgi Formu” kullanılmıştır. Katılımcıların sürekli optimal performans duygu durumlarındaki cinsiyet ve egzersiz davranış değişkenlerine göre farkı belirlemek için Çok Yönlü Varyans Analizi (MANOVA) kullanılmıştır. MANOVA analizi sonuçları, erkek ve kadın egzersiz katılımcılarının sürekli optimal performans duygu durumu puanları arasında fark olmadığını ortaya koyarken (p>0.01); egzersiz sıklığı (Hotelling’s T2 = 0.14; F (9,186) = 2.94; p<0.01), egzersiz süresi (Hotelling’s T2 = 0.15; F (9,181) = 2.95; p<0.01) ve egzersiz türüne (Hotelling’s T2 = 0.12; F (9,178) = 2.44;p<0.01) göre puanların farklılaştığını göstermektedir. Bu çalışmanın bulguları, egzersiz süresi, sıklığı ve türünün bireylerin yapmış olduğu aktivitede yüksek konsantrasyona sahip olmasında, aktivite üzerinde bilişsel yeterliği ve kontrolü olduğunu hissetmesinde ve yaptığı aktiviteden almış olduğu içsel hazın artmasında etkili olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_152775_21_pp_71-78.pdf
  • 2
71–78
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Asakawa K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic
personality in Japanese college students: How do
they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of
Happiness Studies, 5, 123–154.
2. Aşçı FH, Çağlar E, Eklund RC, Altıntaş A, Jackson S.
(2007). Durumluk ve sürekli optimal performans duygu
durum-2 ölçekleri’nin uyarlama çalışması. Spor Bilimleri
Dergisi, 18, 4, 182-196.
3. Catley D, Duda J. (1997). Psychological antecedents
of the frequency and intensity of flow in golfers.
International Journal of Sport Psychology, 28, 309-322.
4. Csikszentmihalyi M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of
Optimal Experience. New York: HarperCollins.
5. Csikszentmihalyi M, LeFevre J. (1989). Optimal
experince in work and leisure. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 56, 815-822.
6. Haworth JT, Hill S. (1992). Work, leisure and
psychological well being in a sample of young adults.
Journal of Community & Applied Psychology, 2, 147-160.
7. Fournier J, Gaudreau P, Demontrond-Behr P, Visioli
J, Forest J, Jackson SA. (2007). French translation of
the flow state scale-2: Factor structure, cross-cultural
invariance, and associations with goal attainment.
Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 897-916.
8. Grove JR, Lewis MAE. (1996). Hypnotic susceptibility
and the attainment of flowlike states during exercise.
Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18, 380-391.
9. Jackson SA, Eklund RC. (2004). The Flow Scales
Manual. Morgantown, WV, USA: Fitness Information
Technology, Inc.
10. Jackson SA, Marsh HW. (1996). Development and
validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: The
flow state scale. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology,
18, 17–35.
11. Jackson SA, Roberts GC. (1992). Positive performance
states of athletes: Toward a conceptual understanding
of peak performance. The Sport Psychologist, 6, 156–171.
12. Jackson SA, Kimiecik JC, Ford SK, Marsh HW. (1998).
Psychological correlates of flow in sport. Journal of
Sport & Exercise Psychology, 20, 358–378.
13. Jackson SA, Thomas PR, Marsh HW, Smethurst
CJ. (2001). Relationships between flow, self-concept,
psychological skills, and performance. Journal of
Applied Sport Psychology, 13, 129–153.
14. Kawabata M, Mallett CJ, Jackson SA. (2008). The flow
state scale and dispositional flow scale-2: Examination
of factorial validity and reliability for Japanese adults.
Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 9, 465-485.
15. Keller J, Bless H. (2008). Flow and regulatory
compatibility: An experimental approach to the flow
model of intrinsic motivation. Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin, 34, 196-209.
16. Kivikangas JM. (2006). Psychophysiology of flow
experience: An explorative study. Unpublished Thesis.
Department of Psychology. University of Helsinki.
17. Kowal J, Fortier MS. (2000). Testing relationships
from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic
motivation using flow as a motivational consequence.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 171-181.
18. Moneta GB. (2004a). The flow experience across
cultures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 2, 115-121.
19. Moneta GB. (2004b). The flow model of intrinsic
motivation in Chinese: Cultural and personal.
moderators. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5, 181–217.
20. Murcia JAM, Gimeno EC, Coll DGC. (2008). Relationship
among goal orientations, motivational climate and flow
in adolescents athletes: Differences by gender. The
Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 1, 181-191.
21. Russell WD. (2001). An examination of flow state
occurrence in college athletes. Journal of Sport
Behavior, 24, 1, 83-107.
22. Sharp EH, Coastsworth JD, Darling N, Cumsille P,
Ranieri S. (2007). Gender differences in the self-defining
activities and identity experiences of adolescents and
emerging adults. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 251-269.
23. Stavrou NA, Zervas Y, Karteroliotis K, Jackson SA.
(2007). Flow experience and athletes’ performance
with refernce to the ortogonal model of flow. The Sport
Psychologist, 21, 438-457.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com