You are here

INSERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE

INSERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ VIEWS ABOUT THE NATURE OF SCIENCE

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study was to investigate the views of inservice science teachers on the nature of science (NOS) and scientific knowledge, which is a requisite for scientific literacy. Descriptive method is used in this study. The Views of the Nature of Science (VNOS) questionnaire, Form-C, developed by Abd-El-Khalick, Lederman, Bell, & Schwartz (2001) was utilized to collect qualitative data on science teachers’ views about NOS. A total of thirty-two science teachers who work at several primary schools in Zonguldak, Turkey formed the sampling of this study. Analysis of responses to the open-ended questionnaire indicated that most of the inservice science teachers have alternative conceptions about NOS in terms of understanding of the empirical and tentative nature of science, and the role of creativity in science and the relationship between theories and laws. Moreover, participants failed to explain subjectivity of scientific knowledge and the distinction between observation and inference in the processes of science with aspects of the NOS. On the other hand, they had adequate understandings of the role for social and cultural factors in the construction of scientific knowledge.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma bilimsel okuryazarlığın temeli olan bilimin doğası ve bilimsel bilgi hakkındaki fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin görüşlerini belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmada betimsel yöntem kullanılmıştır. Araştırmada fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin bilimin doğası hakkındaki bilgi düzeylerini belirlemek amacıyla Abd-El-Khalick, Lederman, Bell, & Schwartz, (2001) tarafından geliştirilen Bilimin Doğası Hakkındaki Görüşler Anketi kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın örneklemini Zonguldak İli genelindeki ilköğretim okullarında görev yapan otuziki fen bilgisi öğretmeni oluşturmuştur. Araştırmada elde edilen verilerin analizinde fen bilgisi öğretmenlerinin bilimsel çalışmanın nasıl yapılacağı ve bilimin ne olduğu hakkında farklı görüşlere sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
1-11

REFERENCES

References: 

Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82 (4), 417-36.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (10), 1057-95.
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Lederman, N.G., Bell, R.L., Schwartz, R.S. (2001). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. In P. Rubba, J. Rye, W. Di Biase, & B. Crawford (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2001 Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science. Pensacola, FL: Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.
Akerson, V.L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (4), 295-317.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for Sciencitific Literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Bell, R. L., Lederman, N.G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000). Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (6), 563-81.
Bell, R. L., Blair, L.M., Crawford, B.A., & Lederman, N.G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’understanding of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 (5), 487-509.
Dickinson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F.S, & Lederman, N.G. (2000). Changing elementary teachers’ views of the NOS: Effective strategies for science methods courses. ED 441 680.
Dogan, N. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 (10), 1083-1112.
Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 (4), 331-59.
Lederman, N.G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36 (8), 916-29.
Macaroglu, E., Tasar, M.F., & Cataloglu, E. (1998). Turkish preservice elementary school teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, San Diego, CA.
Meichtry, Y.J. (1999). The nature of science and scientific knowledge: Implications for a preservice elementary methods course. Science and Education, 8 (3), 273-86.
Morrison, J.A., Raab, F. & Ingram, D. (2009). Factors influencing elementary and secondary teachers’ views on the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Earlybird view.
Moss, D.M., Abrams, E.D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23 (8), 771-90.
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 (2), 147-165.
Yalvac, B., & Crawford B. A. (2002). Eliciting prospective science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the international conference of the association for the education of teachers in science, Charlotte, NC.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com