You are here

Home » Content

The Effect Of Various Polishing Systems On Surface Roughness Of Nano and Microhybrid Composite Restoratives : An In Vitro Surface Profilometric Study

The Effect Of Various Polishing Systems On Surface Roughness Of Nano and Microhybrid Composite Restoratives : An In Vitro Surface Profilometric Study

Journal Name:

  • Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Introduction: The smoothness of the restorative material’s surfaces have a great importance in the success and clinical longevity of the restorations. Material & Methods: A total of 120 acrylic blocks with a recess of 2mm x 3mm x 3mm dimension were made using a custom made stainless steel template.(Figure 1) Of them, 60 specimens were of (microhybrid composite) and 60 were of (nano composite) . Results & Conclusion : From present study we were concluded Nanofilled composites (Supreme XT) showed better polish ability when compared with microhybrid composites ( Filtex Z-250) with Mylar strip provide the smoothest surface finish for both supreme XT and Filtek Z-250.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-effect-various-polishing-systems-surface-roughness-nano-and-microhybrid-composite-restoratives-vitro-surface-profilometric-study.pdf
  • 3
214-220
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

1. R. Gupta et al; A Spectrophotometric Evaluation of Color
Changes of Various Tooth Colored Veneering Materials
after Exposure to Commonly Consumed Beverages; The
Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society ;2005;5:72-78.
2. Uçtasli MB et al; The Effect of Different Finishing and
Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Different
Composite Restorative Materials; Journal of Contemporary
Dental Practice;2007;8;2
3. J .Janus et al; Surface Roughness and Morphology of Three
Nanocomposites after Two Different Polishing Treatments
a Multitechnique Approach; Dental Materials,2010;26:416-
.425
4. Sturdevant’s Art Science of Operative Dentistry,4th
Edition,Roberson T.M,Heymann H.O.,Swift E.J,Mosby.
5. Tatsuo ENDO et al; Surface Texture and Roughness of
Polished Nanofill and Nanohybrid Resin Composites;
2010;29:213-223.
6. Y Korkmaz et al; The Influence of One-step Polishing
Systems on the Surface Roughness and Microhardness of
Nanocomposites; Operative Dentistry, 2008, 33-1, 44-50.
7. Ivo K Rejci et al; Resin Composite Polishing-Filling the
Gaps; 1999; 30-7:490-495.
8. I. E. Ruyter Composites -Characterization of Composite
Filling Materials: Reactor Response ;Adv Dent Res 2-
1:122-129.
9. LS Turkun;the Effect of One-Step Polishing System on The
Surface Roughness of Three Esthetic Resin Composite
Materials ;Operative Dentistry;2004;29-2:203-211.
Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research; June 2012: Issue-3, Vol.-1, P. 214-220
220
www.ijbamr.com
10 Michael Morgan: Finishing and Polishing of Direct
Posterior Resin Restorations: Pract Proced Aesthet
Dent 2004:16:211-216.
11 M Jung; Surface Geometry of Four Nanofiller and
One Hybrid Composite after One-step and Multiplestep
Polishing; Operative Dentistry, 2007, 32-4, 347-
355.
12. M Jung et al; Surface Texture of Four Nanofilled and
One Hybrid Composite After Finishing; Operative
Dentistry, 2007, 32-1, 45-52.
13. Sumita B Mitra et al; An Application Of Nano
Technology in Advanced Dental
Materials;JADA;2003;134:1382-1390.
14. AJ St Georges et al; Surface Finish Produced on Three
Resin Composites by New Polishing Systems;
Operative Dentistry;2005;30-5:593-597.
15. Duygu Sarac et al; The Effect of Polishing Techniques
on the Surface Roughness and Color Change of
Composite Resins; J Prosthet Dent;2006;96:33-40
16. Michael Morgan: Finishing and Polishing of Direct
Posterior Resin Restorations: Pract Proced Aesthet
Dent 2004:16:211-216
17. A. U. J. Yap, S. H. Yap, C. K. Teo, and J. J. Ng,
“Finishing/ polishing of composite and compomer
restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems,”
Operative Dentistry, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 275–279, 2004
18. G. Willems, P. Lambrechts, M. Braem', M. Vuylsteke-
Wauters2, And G. Vanherle The Surface Roughness
Of Enamel-To-Enamel Contact Areas Compared With
The Intrinsic Roughness Of Dental Resin Compositesj
Dent Res September 1991 70:1299-1305.
19. Kaplan BA, Goldstein GR, Vijayaraghavan TV,
Nelson IK. The effect of three polishing systems on
the surface roughness of four hybrid composites: a
profilometric and scanning electron microscopy study.
J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76(1):34-8.
20. Hondrum SO, Fernández R Jr. Contouring,
finishing and polishing Class 5 restorative
materials. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 30-36.
21. Jung M, Voit S, Klimek J. Surface geometry of
three packable and one hybrid composite after
finishing. Oper Dent. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):53-9
22. James W. Stoddard, D.D.S., Glen H. Johnson,
D.D.S., M.S An evaluation of polishing agents for
composite resins. The Journal of Prosthetic
Dentistry Volume 65, Issue 4, April 1991, Pages
491–495
23. Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashihara H, Inoue
The Effects of various finishing methods on
staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans
HS-6 on composite resins. Dent Mater. 1985
Dec;1(6):225-7.
24. Rüstü Gedik; Surface Roughness of New
Microhybrid Resin-Based Composites; J Am Dent
Assoc 2005; 136; 1106-1112.
.............................................................................
Date of manuscript submission: 22 December 2011
Date of initial approval: 08 February 2012
Date of Peer review approval: 20 April 2012
Date of final draft preparation: 28 May 2012
Date of Publication: 9 June 2012
Conflict of Interest: Nil, Source of Support: Nil.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com