You are here

Traditional versus Computer Assisted Teaching of Human Osteology: A Randomized Control Trial Study.

Traditional versus Computer Assisted Teaching of Human Osteology: A Randomized Control Trial Study.

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Osteology teaching is effective when it is taught in small groups, but due to time constraint, shortage of trained faculty and increase in the number of intake of students, traditional teaching in small group has become challenging. Therefore, an innovative technique for teaching osteology was developed to overcome the above limitations. Methods: Sony handycam with 500 optical zoom was connected directly to the LCD projector which gave a highly magnified image of bone on the screen. The teacher had freedom to move the bone as and when required and was able to emphasize the details as per need of students. First year BDS students (n=90) were randomly divided into two groups. One group was taught osteology by tradition al method and other with the help of developed device by the same teacher. Total 4 tutorial classes were taken of each group. After completion of each class objective structured practical examination was conducted to assess the performance. Students' feedback was also taken.It was found that performance after teaching with the help of visual aid was better and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.0204). Student's feedback on the two methodologies of teaching revealed that students preferred traditional way of teaching.
370-374

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Coffee, J and Hillier, S (2008) Teaching pre-cursor clinical skills using an on-line audio-visual tool: an evaluation using student responses. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,
4( 4).
2. Salyers, V.L. (2007). Teaching Psychomotor skills to beginning nursing students using a web-enhanced approach: a quasi-experimental study. International Journal of Nursing education Scholarship 4 Iss. 1: Art 11
3. Elizondo-Omana, R. E., Morales-Gomez, J. A., Guzman, S. K L., Hernandez, I. L., Ibarra, R. P., & Vilchez, F. C. (2004). Traditional teaching supported by computer-assisted learning for macroscopic anatomy. The Anatomical Record Part B: The New Anatomist, 278B(1), 18-22.
4. Lewis, M. J. (2003). Computer assisted learning for teaching anatomy and physiology in subjects allies to medicine. Medical Teacher, 25(2), 204-206.
5. Hallgren, R. C., Parkhurst, P. E., Monson, C. L., & Crewe, N. M. (2002). An interactive, Web-based tool for learning anatomic landmarks. Academic Medicine, 77(3), 263-265.
6. Bacro, T., Gilbertson, B., & Coultas, J. ( 2000). Web delivery of anatomy video clips using a CD-ROM. The Anatomical Record, 261(2), 78-82
7. Kinney, P., Keskula, D.R., & Perry, J. (1997). The effect of a computer assisted instructional program on physical therapy students. Journal of Allied Health, 26(2), 57-61
8. Barker ,S. P. (1988). Comparison of effectiveness of interactive videodisc versus lecture-demonstration instruction. Physical Therapy, 68(5), 699-703.
9. Sinav, A., & Ambron, R. (2004). Interactive web-based programs to teach functional anatomy: the pterygopalatine fossa. The Anatomical Record (part B: New Anatomy), 279B, 4-8
10. Van Sint Jan, S., Crudele, M., Gashegu, J., Feipel, V., Poulet, P., Saliva, P., et. al. (2003).
Development of multimedia learning modules for teaching human anatomy: application to osteology and functional anatomy. The Anatomical Record (part B: New Anatomy), 272B, 98-106.
www.ijbamr.com
373
Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research; December 2012: Issue-5, Vol.-2, P. 370-374
11. Estes A, Ressler S, Welch R, Hanus J (2009). Seminar on coomunication skills. Exceed teaching workshop. http://www.asce.org/files/ppt/exceed/USMA-09-Seminar-VI-chalkboard.ppt.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com