You are here

Home » Content

ENDOSKOPİK RETROGRAD KOLANJİOPANKRETOGRAFİ KOMPLİKASYON LARI

Endoskopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications

Journal Name:

  • İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2000

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: The aim of this study was to review the complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in the patients. Method: To evaluate the frequency of complications associated with diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP, all endoscopic procedures from 1993 to 1999 were retrospectively reviewed. Results: A total of 705 procedures were performed on 504 patients. Overall complication was %8 (n: 42) and mortality was 0.5% (n: 3). Pancreatitis and cholangitis were the most common complication after diagnostic ERCP with a rate of 2% (n: 10) and bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy with a rate of 2 % (n: 10). Conclusions: These complication rates can be said reasonable for biliary therapeutic interventions.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışma endoskopik retrograd kolanjiopankretografi (ERKP) komplikasyon-Iarını hastalarda değerlendirmek üzere planlandı. Metot: ERKP komplikasyonlarını araştırmak için 1993-1999 tarihleri arasındaki tüm endoskopik incelemeler değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Toplam 504 hastada 705 kez girişim uygulandı, genel komplikasyon oranı %8 (n: 42) ve mortalite %0.5 (n: 3) olarak bulundu. En sık komplikasyon tanısal ERKP sonrası pankreatit ve kolanjit %2 (n: 10), endoskopik sfinkterotomi sonrası kanama %2.8 (n: 10) oranında bulundu. Sonuç: Bulunan komplikasyon oranlarının tedavi amaçlı biliyer girişimlerde makul olduğu söylenebilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-endoskopik-retrograd-kolanjiopankretografi-komplikasyon-lari.pdf
  • 2
121-124
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Young HS, Keeffe EB. Complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy. In Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver disease 6 th edition edit by Feldman M, Sleisenger MH, Scharschmidth BF. 1998 WB Sounders Compony Philadelpia ch: 19;301-9
2. Classen M, Rösch T, Neuhaus H. Cholangiography and associated methods: diagnostic implications. In: Bockus Gastroenterology WB Sounders Compony Philadelpia 4th 1995 Edited by Haubrich W. ch: 135, 2597-616.
3. Classen M, Rösch T, Neuhaus H. Cholangiography and associated methods: therapeutic potential. In: Bockus
Gastroenterology WB Sounders Compony Philadelpia 1995 Edited by Haubrich W. ch: 136, 2617-34.
4. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen Russel RCG, Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991: 1;37: 383-93.
5. Vaira D, Ainley C, Williams S et all. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet 1989;2: 431-3.
6. Vaira D, Ainley C, Williams S et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet 1989;2: 431-3.
7. Leese T, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL. Successes, failures, early complications and their management following endoscopic sphincterotomy results in 394 consecutive patients from a single centre. Br J Surg 1985;72: 215-9
8. Tanaka M, Ideka S, Ogawa Y, Yoshimoto H, Motsumoto S. Long term prognosis after endoscopic after endoscopic sphincterotomy for gall stone disease: Follow up 333 patients over five years post sphincterotomy. Proceding of the Society for American Gatrointestinal endoscopi Surgeons 1990: 29

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com