You are here

An analysis of determinants of going concern audit opinion: Evidence from Spain stock exchange

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.683
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The main objective of this article is to go in-depth into the relationship between going concern audit opinion and certain characteristics of the company and auditor, including financial decline. Design/methodology/approach: A Logit analysis was carried out in order to enable us to discover the probability of receiving a going concern audit opinion. Findings: Characteristics of the company and characteristics of the auditor are discussed, and the analysis indicates that it is not financial decline, but rather registering losses and being audited by a small-scale auditor, that increase the likelihood of a company receiving a going concern audit opinion. Practical implications: The results obtained are interesting for the profession and users because they provide evidence of the reasons that converge in the cases where a going concern audit opinion is included in the auditing reports of companies characterised by being immersed in a financial crisis. Originality/value: This article considers the circumstances of both the company and the auditing process, which influence the fact that the auditing report includes a going concern audit opinion. In addition, the article includes the financial decline, and let us to analyze if the decline of the company’s financial position between t-1 and t causes the auditor to include a going concern audit opinion.
1
16

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

ALTMAN, E. (1993). Corporate Financial Distress and Bankrupty (2nd ed.). New York: John
Wiley & Sons. Available online in: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~ealtman/PredFnclDistr.pdf
ARNEDO, L.; LIZARRAGA, F.; SÁNCHEZ, S.; RUIZ, E. (2012). Las expectativas del usuario ante
la salvedad al principio de empresa en funcionamiento. Evidencia empírica del fenómeno de
la profecía autocumplida para el caso español. Revista Española de Financiación y
Contabilidad, 154: 263-289.
BELLOVARY, J.L.; GIACOMINO, D.E.; AKERS, M.D. (2007). A Review of Bankruptcy Prediction
Studie: 1930 to present. Journal of Financial Education, 33(Winter): 1-43.
CITRON, D.; TAFFLER, R. (1992). The audit report under going concern uncertainties: an
empirical analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 22: 337-345.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1992.9729449
DEFOND, M.; RAGHUNANDAN, K.; SUBRAMANYAM, K. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair
auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting
Research, 40(4): 1.247-1.274.
GEIGER, M.A.; RAGHUNANDAN, K. (2002). Auditor Tenure and Audit Reporting Failures.
Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 21(1): 67-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.67
GEIGER, M.A.; RAGHUNANDAN, K.; RAMA, D.V. (2005). Recent changes in the association
between bankruptcies and prior audit opinions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,
24(1): 21-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/aud.2005.24.1.21
JONES, F.L. (1987). Current Techniques in Bankruptcy Prediction. Journal of Accounting
Literature, 6: 131-164.
JONES, F.L. (1996). The information content of the auditor’s going concern evaluation. Journal
of Accounting and Public Policy, 15(1): 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0278-4254(95)00062-3
KRISHNAN, J.; KRISHNAN, J.; STEPHENS, R. (1996). The simultalleous relation between
auditor swatching and audit opinion: and empirical analysis. Accounting and Business
Research, 26: 224-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00014788.1996.9729513
ROSNER, R.L. (2003). Earnings manipulation in failing firms. Contemporary Accounting
Research, 20(2): 361-408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1506/8EVN-9KRB-3AE4-EE81
Intangible Capital, 2016 (www.intangiblecapital.org)

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com