You are here

Home » Content

Producció científica en el camp de les spin-off acadèmiques: Una anàlisi bibliomètrica

Scientific production in the field of academic spin-off: A bibliometric analysis

Journal Name:

  • Intangible Capital

Publication Year:

  • 2016
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.696

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: Literature review of existing academic spin-offs in order to present the current situation at the international level. Design/methodology: Literature review. Findings: The bibliometric analysis of the literature (1990-2014) on academic spin-off permits find the most relevant authors, journals, both directly (number of publications) and indirectly (number of citations) contribute to the literature, analysis co-authors, keywords, geolocation and co-citation between articles. The scientific production in this field consists mainly of articles written in English in high impact journals (published mainly in recent years), indicating both the field today, as the interest in high impact journals published studies relating to the spin-off. The incidence of a large number of authors who publish only a single job, besides the small number of collaborations between them, it find out what the current literature is still growing. Research limitations/implications: Similarly to other studies, this is not without limitations. A possible limitation of the study lies in the possible non-inclusion of one of the key items considered in the literature, but not for lack of methodology, but rather by the scope of the database. Originality/value: The added value of this study lies in an updated review of the literature spin-off with little use of analysis techniques used in this field.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Objecte: Revisió de la literatura existent de les spin-off acadèmiques amb l’objecte de presentar la situació actual de la producció científica d’aquest camp. Disseny/metodologia: Anàlisi bibliomètrica. Aportacions i resultats: L’anàlisi bibliomètrica de la literatura (1990-2014) sobre spin-off acadèmiques ha permès identificar als autors més rellevants, les revistes que tant directament (nombre de publicacions) com indirectament (nombre de cites) contribueixen a la literatura, l’anàlisi de coautoria, paraules clau, la geolocalització i cocitació entre els articles. La producció científica d’aquest camp està composta principalment per articles escrits en anglès, en revistes d’alt impacte (publicats principalment als últims anys), el que indica tant l’actualitat del camp, com l’interès de revistes d’alt impacte de publicar estudis referents a les spin-off. La incidència d’un nombre elevat d’autors que sols publiquen un sol treball, a més del nombre reduït de col·laboracions entre ells, identifica que la literatura actual està en procés de creixement i d’elevat potencial. Limitacions: De forma anàloga a altres estudis, aquest no està exempt de limitacions. Una possible limitació del estudi resideix en la possible no inclusió d'algun dels articles potencialment rellevants a la literatura, no per falta de metodologia, sinó més bé per l’abast de la base de dades (és la més important però no és l’única). Valor afegit: El valor afegit d’aquest estudi resideix en una revisió actualitzada de la literatura spin-off amb tècniques d’anàlisi poc utilitzades en aquest camp.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-produccio-cientifica-en-el-camp-de-les-spin-academiques-una-analisi-bibliometrica.pdf
  • 1
246
267
  • Turkish

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

ACEDO, F.J.; BARROSO, C.; CASANUEVA, C.; GALÁN, J.L. (2006). Co‐Authorship in
management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of
Management Studies, 43(5): 957-983. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00625.x
BAYER, A.E.; SMART, J.C.; MCLAUGHLIN, G.W. (1990). Mapping intellectual structure of a
scientific subfield through author cocitations. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 41(6): 444-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-
4571(199009)41:6<444::AID-ASI12>3.0.CO;2-J
BERELSON, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. New York, NY, US: Free
Press.CALLON, M.; COURTIAL, J.; PENAN, H. (1993). La Scientométrie. Vol. 2727 Presses
universitaires de France.
CAMBROSIO, A.; LIMOGES, C.; COURTIAL, J.P.; LAVILLE, F. (1993). Historical scientometrics?
Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with coword analysis. Scientometrics,
27(2): 119-143.
CLARK, B.R. (1998). The entrepreneurial university: Demand and response 1. Tertiary
Education & Management, 4(1): 5-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13583883.1998.9966941
COULTER, N.; MONARCH, I.; KONDA, S. (1998). Software engineering as seen through its
research literature: A study in co‐word analysis. Journal of the American Society for
Information Science, 49(13): 1206-1223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-
4571(1998)49:13<1206::AID-ASI7>3.0.CO;2-F
D’ESTE, P.; PATEL, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors
underlying the variety of interactions with industry?. Research Policy, 36(9): 1295-1313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002
DI GREGORIO, D.; SHANE, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than
others?. Research Policy, 32(2): 209-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00097-5
DIODATO, V.P. (1994). Dictionary of bibliometrics. Psychology Press. Binghamton: The Haworth
Press.
DJOKOVIC, D.; SOUITARIS, V. (2008). Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review
with suggestions for further research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3): 225-247.
ETZKOWITZ, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new
university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8): 823-833. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-
7333(98)00093-6
ETZKOWITZ, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: The invention of the entrepreneurial
university. Research Policy, 32(1): 109-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00009-4
ETZKOWITZ, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal
of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1): 64-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2004.004551
FINI, R.; GRIMALDI, R.; SANTONI, S.; SOBRERO, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The
role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs.
Research Policy, 40(8): 1113-1127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.05.013
FREEMAN, L.C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks,
1(3): 215-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 GARFIELD, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?. Scientometrics, 1(4):
359-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02019306
GIBBONS, M.; LIMOGES, C.; NOWOTNY, H.; SCHWARTZMAN, S.; SCOTT, P.; TROW, M. (1994).
The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary
societies. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
GLÄNZEL, W.; MOED, H.F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research.
Scientometrics, 53(2): 171-193.
GUPTA, B.; BHATTACHARYA, S. (2003). Bibliometric approach towards mapping the dynamics
of science and technology. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 24(1):
3-8
HELGESON, J.G.; KLUGE, E.A.; MAGER, J.; TAYLOR, C. (1984). Trends in consumer behavior
literature: A content analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4): 449-454.
HUDSON, J. (1996). Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. The Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 10(3): 153-158.
IGLESIAS SÁNCHEZ, P.; JAMBRINO MALDONADO, C.; PEÑAFIEL VELASCO, A. (2012).
Caracterización de las spin-off universitarias como mecanismo de transferencia de
tecnología a través de un análisis clúster. Revista Europea De Dirección y Economía De La
Empresa, 21(3): 240-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2012.05.004
KASSARJIAN, H.H. (1977). Content analysis in consumer research. Journal of Consumer
Research, 4(1): 8-18.
LINK, A.N.; SCOTT, J.T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the
determinants of the formation of US university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34(7):
1106-1112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.015
LOCKETT, A.; WRIGHT, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of
university spin-out companies. Research Policy, 34(7): 1043-1057.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.006
MARKMAN, G.D.; PHAN, P.H.; BALKIN, D.B.; GIANIODIS, P.T. (2005). Entrepreneurship and
university-based technology transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2): 241-263.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003
MARTIN, B.R. (1996). The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research.
Scientometrics, 36(3): 343-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02129599
MCQUEEN, D.H.; WALLMARK, J.T. (1982). Spin-off companies from chalmers university of
technology. Technovation, 1(4): 305-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(82)90010-4 MOED, H.F.; BURGER, W.; FRANKFORT, J.; VAN RAAN, A.F. (1985). The application of
bibliometric indicators: Important field-and time-dependent factors to be considered.
Scientometrics, 8(3-4): 177-203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02016935
MURRAY, F. (2004). The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the
laboratory life. Research Policy, 33(4): 643-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.013
O'SHEA, R.P.; ALLEN, T.J.; CHEVALIER, A.; ROCHE, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation,
technology transfer and spinoff performance of US universities. Research Policy, 34(7):
994-1009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.011
PERSSON, O.; DANELL, R.; SCHNEIDER, J.W. (2009). How to use bibexcel for various types of
bibliometric analysis. Celebrating Scholarly Communication Studies: A Festschrift for Olle
Persson at His 60th Birthday, 9-24.
PIRNAY, F.; SURLEMONT, B. (2003). Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Business
Economics, 21(4): 355-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026167105153
RONDA-PUPO, G.A.; GUERRAS-MARTÍN, L.Á. (2013). Red de cooperación institucional de
investigación en dirección de empresas en españa en torno a la revista CEDE: 1998-2010.
Cuadernos De Economía y Dirección De La Empresa, 16(1): 1-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cede.2012.06.003
ROTHAERMEL, F.T.; AGUNG, S.D.; JIANG, L. (2007). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy
of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4): 691-791.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm023
ROZNOWSKI, J.L. (2003). A content analysis of mass media stories surrounding the consumer
privacy issue 1990‐2001. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(2): 52-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/dir.10054
SHANE, S.A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation.
Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781843769828
SHANE, S.; STUART, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university
start-ups. Management Science, 48(1): 154-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280
SHEEN, M.R. (1992). Barriers to scientific and technical knowledge acquisition in industrial
R&D. R&D Management, 22(2): 135-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1992.tb00802.x
SLAUGHTER, S.; LESLIE, L.L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the
entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
STEFFENSEN, M.; ROGERS, E.M.; SPEAKMAN, K. (2000). Spin-offs from research centers at a
research university. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1): 93-111.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00006-8 THOMSON REUTERS (2014). Web of Science. Disponible online a: https://apps.webofknowledge.com
TIJSSEN, R.J. (1992). A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and
technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research. Research Policy, 21(1): 27-44.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(92)90025-Y
VALDERRAMA-ZURIÁN, J.C.; GONZÁLEZ-ALCAIDE, G.; VALDERRAMA-ZURIÁN, F.J.;
ALEIXANDRE-BENAVENT, R.; MIGUEL-DASIT, A. (2007). Redes de coautorías y colaboración
institucional en revista española de cardiología. Revista Española De Cardiología, 60(2):
117-130.
VERBEEK, A.; DEBACKERE, K.; LUWEL, M.; ZIMMERMANN, E. (2002). Measuring progress and
evolution in science and technology–I: The multiple uses of bibliometric indicators.
International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(2): 179-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-
2370.00083
VOHORA, A.; WRIGHT, M.; LOCKETT, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of
university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1): 147-175.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0
YALE, L.; GILLY, M.C. (1988). Trends in advertising research: A look at the content of
marketing-oriented journals from 1976 to 1985. Journal of Advertising, 17(1): 12-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1988.10673099

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com