You are here

Home » Content

Does it pay to be social responsible? Portuguese SMEs feedback

Journal Name:

  • Intangible Capital

Publication Year:

  • 2016
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.712

Key Words:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Purpose: The research on corporate social responsibility has been focused mainly on Anglo- Saxon countries and big companies. Most scholars agree there is a positive relationship between companies social and economic performance, however, this is not unanimous. Moreover, during economic downturns, companies struggle for survival and might consider corporate social responsibility efforts should be postponed. This research investigates if there is a positive relationship between social performance and key business results using a large sample of small and medium Portuguese companies over an extended period of time. Design/methodology: The investigation is made by using survey responses from a sample of 2.222 small and medium companies (SMEs) over a 10 year period, from the Portuguese IAPMEI – Public Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation Benchmarking and Good Practices database. The hypothesis that there is a positive relationship between social and key business results performance was tested with correlation analysis and was complemented with semi-structured interviews of key Portuguese Sustainability Managers. Findings: The research results support the existence of valid positive relationships between companies’ social performance and key business results, confirming it does pay to invest in corporate social responsibility even in less favorable economic scenarios and for small and medium companies across all business sectors. Research limitations/implications: It was not possible to use more powerful statistical methods such as Partial Least Squares (PLS) or Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) due to data constraints and more qualitative research should be done to triangulate the results and better understating of the cause and effect relationships. Practical implications: Both managers and academics should be aware of the relevance of corporate social responsibility to assure companies enduring success and create benefits for stakeholders and society at large. Originality/value: This research makes contributions for the social and economic relationship body of knowledge with a particular emphasis on small and medium companies in Portugal and a potential application to other similar European countries, by using a large sample basis over an extended period of time.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-does-it-pay-be-social-responsible-portuguese-smes-feedback.pdf
  • 2
487
505
  • English

JEL Codes:

REFERENCES

References: 

Abreu, R., David, F., & Crowther, D. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in Portugal: Empirical
evidence of corporate behavior. Corporate Governance, 5, 3-18.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14720700510630013
Aguinis, H., Dalton, D.R., Bosco, F.A., Pierce, C.A., & Dalton, C.M. (2011). Meta-analytic choices and
judgment calls: Implications for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly
impact. Journal of Management, 37(1),5-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206310377113
Aragón-Correa, J., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactivecorporate
environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-78.
Aupperle, K., Carroll, A., & Hatfield, J. (1985). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between
Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446-463.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256210
Ayuso, S., Rodríguez, M.A., García-Castro, R., & Ariño, M.A. (2007). Maximizing stakeholders’ interests:
An empirical analysis of the stakeholder approach to corporate governance. IESE Working Paper n. 670.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982325
Bakker, F., Groenewegen, P., Hond, F. (2005). A bibliometric analysis of 30 years or research and
theory on corporate social responsibility and Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society,
44(3), 283-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650305278086
Berrone, P., Surroca, J., & Tribó, J.A. (2007). Corporate ethical identity as a determinant of firm
performance: A test of the mediating role of stakeholder satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1),
35-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9276-1
Branco, M., & Rodrigues, L. (2008). Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese
companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 83, 685-701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9658-z
Carroll, A. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of
Management Review, 4, 497-505.
Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Towards the moral management of
organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34, 39-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
Carroll, A. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business and
Society, 38, 268-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303 Carroll, A.B., & Schwartz, M.S. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach.
Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/beq200313435
Duarte, A.P., Mouro, C., & Neves, J.G. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: Mapping its social
meaning. Management Research: The Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 8(2), 101-122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/1536-541011066461
Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for
sustainable development. California Management Review, 36, 90-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165746
European Commission (2001). Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social
Responsibility. European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission (2002). Communication concerning Social Responsibility of Companies: A contribution for
sustainable development. European Commission, Brussels.
Ferro, R.L. (2014). Management systems from 9K, 14K, 18K to SR (26K): Its influence on risk management and
organizational competitive factors. PhD dissertation, UAL-Universidade Autónoma de Lisboa.
Fonseca, L., Ramos, A., Rosa, A., Braga, A.C., & Sampaio, P. (2012). Impact of Social Responsibility
Programmes in Stakeholder Satisfaction: An Empirical Study of PortugueseManagers’ Perceptions.
Journal of US-China Public Administration, 9(5), 586-590.
Fonseca, L.M. (2015). Strategic Drivers for Implementing Sustainability Programs in Portuguese
Organizations– Let’s Listen to Aristotle: From Triple to Quadruple Bottom Line. Sustainability: The
journal of Record (USA), 8(3), 136-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/SUS.2015.29004
Fonseca, L.M., & Lima, V.M. (2015). Countries three Wise Men: Sustainability, Innovation, and
Competitiveness. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(4), 1288-1302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1525
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Gago, C., Cardoso, E., Campos, J., Vicente, L., & Santos, M. (2005). Responsabilidade social das empresas
portuguesas: 25 casos de referência (Corporate Social Responsibility of Portuguese Corporations: 25
Reference Cases), Companhia das Cores, Design e Comunicação Empresarial, Lisbon.
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004), Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of
Business Ethics, 53, 51-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:BUSI.0000039399.90587.34
Habish, A., Jonker, J., Wegner, M., & Schimpeter, R. (Eds) (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility Across
Europe. Berlin: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b138371 Hilman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management and social issues:
What’s the bottom line?. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 125-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-
0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H
ISO (2010). ISO 26000:2010 International Standard, Guidance on social responsibility. Geneva: International
Organization for Standardization.
Kanji, G., & Chopra, P. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in a global economy. Total Quality
Management, 21(2), 119-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14783360903549808
Kashmanian, R., Wells, R., & Keenan, C. (2011). Corporate Environmental Sustainability Strategy: Key
Elements. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 44(Winter), 107-130.
http://dx.doi.org/10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2011.wi.00008
Lubin, D., & Esty, D. (2010). The sustainability imperative: Lessons for leaders from previous gamechanging
megatrends. Harvard Business Review, May, 42-50.
Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3556659
Maroco, J., & Bispo, R. (2003). Estatística aplicada às ciências sociais e humanas (Statistics applied to social and
human sciences). Lisbon: CLIMEPSI Editores.
Mattingly, J.E. (2015). Corporate Social Performance A Review of Empirical Research Examining the
Corporation–Society Relationship Using Kinder, Lydenberg, Domini Social Ratings Data. Business
and Society, on line before printing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650315585761
Mcguire, J., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweis, T. (1988). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial
Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 854-872. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256342
Mcwilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective.
The Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
Mcwilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2011). Creating and capturing private and social value: Strategic corporate
social responsibility, resource based theory and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of
Management, 37(5), 1480-1495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385696
Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility?. Corporate Governance, 1(2), 6-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005486
Nadkarni, S., & Barr, P.S. (2008). Environmental context, managerial cognition, and strategic action:
An integrated view. Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1395-1427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.717 Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C., & Rangaswami, M. (2009). Why sustainability is now the key driver of
innovation?. Harvard Business Review, September, 56-64.
NP 4469-1, Norma Portuguesa - Sistemas de gestão da responsabilidade social, Requisitos e linhas de orientação para
a sua utilização (Portuguese Standard – Social responsibility management systems, requirements and
guidelines for its usage), IPQ.
NP 4469-2, Norma Portuguesa - Sistemas de gestão da responsabilidade social, Guia de orientação para a
implementação (Portuguese Standard – Social responsibility management systems, implementation
orientation guide), IPQ.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F.L., & Rynes, S.L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A metaanalysis.
Organisation Studies, 24(3), 403-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
Parhankaugas, A., Mcwilliams, A., & Shrader, R.C. (2014). Doing well by doing better: Entrepreneurs
and Sustainability. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 24(2), 1-20.
Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social
performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518-1541. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206309335188
Pinto, G. (2004). Responsabilidade social das empresas – Estado da arte em Portugal (Corporate social responsibility–
Stateoftheart in Portugal). Lisbon: CECOA.
Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, January-February,
62-67.
Rego, A., Leal, S., Cunha, M.P., Faria, J., & Pinho, C. (2010). How the perceptions of five dimensions
of corporate citizenship and their inter-inconsistencies predict affective commitment. Journal of
Business Ethics, 94(1), 107-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0252-4
Salmones, M., Crespo, A., & Bosque, I. (2005). Influence of corporate social responsibility on loyalty
and valuation of services. Journal of Business Ethics, 61, 369-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-
5841-2
Santos, M.J. (2005). Desenvolvimento sustentável e responsabilidade social (Sustainable Development and Social
Responsibility). Lisbon: Celta.
Sison, A. (2009). From corporate social responsibility to corporate citizenship: Anglo-American and
Continental European perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 235-246.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0395-3
Trudel, R., & Cotte, J. (2009). Does Being Ethical Pay?. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 61-68. United Nations (1997). Agenda for Development. New York, NY, USA.
United Nations (2012). United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio+20. Available online at:
https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/rio20 (Last access date: July, 2015).
United Nations (2014). Human Development Report 2014. Available online at:
http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2014 (Last access date: July, 2015).
Van Marrejick, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between
agency and communion. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 95-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023331212247
Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue, the potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington,
D.C.: Brookings Institution.
Waddock, S., & Graves, S. (1997). The corporate social performance – financial performance link.
Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G
Waddock, S. (2008). The development of corporate responsibility/corporate citizenship. Organization
Management Journal, 5, 29-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/omj.2008.5
World Commission on Environment and Development – WCED (1987). Our Common Future. New
York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Wu, M.L. (2006). Corporate social performance, corporate financial performance and firm size: A
meta-analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8(1), 163-171.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com