You are here

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR A PMSG WITH INTERIOR ROTOR OF N35 AND N42 NDFEB PMs HAVING SAME GEOMETRY IN MICRO WIND TURBINES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this paper is to compare the performance evaluation in terms of the efficiency, cogging torque and manufacturing cost for a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) with interior rotor of N35 and N42 NdFeB permanent magnets (PMs) having same geometry separately used in a micro wind turbine (MWT). Firstly N35 type PMs have been used on an interior rotor, and then its performance has been measured and calculated by a MWT setup. After that, N42 type PMs have been used on other interior rotor. According to the obtained results, the PMSG with N42 type presented better efficiency than the PMSG with N35 type. But the PMSG with N42 type has induced a bit more cogging torque than the PMSG with N35 type. When comparing in terms of efficiency, a higher efficiency has been obtained by the PMSG with N42 type.
50
54

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] H. Polinder, J. A. Ferreira, B. B. Jensen, A. B. Abrahamsen, K. Atallah and R. A. McMahon, “Trends in wind turbine generator systems,” IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics, vol. 1, pp. 174–185, Sep. 2013.
[2] H. Mamur, “Design, application, and power performance analyses of a micro wind turbine,” Turk J Electr Eng Co, vol. 23, pp. 1619–1637, 2015.
[3] H. Mamur, M. Ari, F. Korkmaz, I. Topaloglu, A. Cicek and E. Bektas, “Micro wind turbines and power performance analyses,” in Proc. UNITECH 2015 International Scientific Conference, pp. 59-62, vol. 1, Gabrovo, Bulgaria, 20-21 November 2015.
[4] H. Mamur, “Comparison of cogging torque reduction methods for micro wind turbine using permanent magnet synchronous generator,” in Proc. UNITECH 2015 International Scientific Conference, pp. 63–67, vol. 1, Gabrovo, Bulgaria, 20-21 November 2015.
[5] M. M. Koo, S. M. Jang, Y. S. Park, H. I. Park and J. Y. Choi, “Characteristic analysis of direct-drive wind power generator considering permanent magnet shape and skew effects to reduce torque ripple based on analytical approach,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 49, pp. 3917–3920, Jul. 2013.
[6] N. Madani, A. Cosic and C. Sadarangani, “A permanent magnet synchronous generator for a small scale vertical axis wind turbine,” in Proc. 2015 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC), pp. 48-52, Coeur d’Alene, ID, 10–13 May 2015.
[7] H. Mamur, I. Topaloglu, F. Korkmaz, M. Ari and I. Atacak, “Design and experimental analysis for reduction of cogging torque by pole shifting in permanent magnet synchronous generator,” Elektron Elektrotech, vol. 20, pp. 39-43, 2014.
[8] G. C. Lee, S. M. Kang and T. U. Jung, “Permanent magnet structure design of outer rotor radial flux permanent magnet generator for reduction cogging torque with design of experiment,” in Proc. 2013 International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems,
H Mamur / International Journal of Energy Applications and Technologies / 3(2) 50 – 54, 2016
54
pp. 315–319, Susan, Korea, 26–29 October 2013.
[9] A. A. Pop, F. Gillon and M. M. Radulescu, “Modeling and permanent-magnet shape optimization of an axial-flux machine,” in Proc. 2012 XXth International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), pp. 357–363, Marseille, France, 2–5 September 2012.
[10] S. M. Jang, H. J. Seo, Y. S. Park, H. I. Park and J. Y. Choi, “Design and electromagnetic field characteristic analysis of 1.5 kW small scale wind power generator for substitution of Nd-Fe-B to ferrite permanent magnet,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 48, pp. 2933–2936, Nov. 2012.
[11] A. A. Pop, F. Jurca, C. Oprea, M. Chirca, S. Breban and M. M. Radulescu, “Axial-flux vs. radial-flux permanent-magnet synchronous generators for micro-wind turbine application,” in Proc. 2013 15th European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE), pp. 1–10, Lille, France, 2–5 September 2013.
[12] Z. Chen, C. Xia, Q. Geng and Y. Yan, “Modeling and analyzing of surface-mounted permanent-magnet synchronous machines with optimized magnetic pole shape,” IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, vol. 50, pp. 1–4. Nov. 2014.
[13] Z. S. Du and T. A. Lipo, “Improved use of rare earth permanent magnet materials and reduction of torque pulsation in interior permanent magnet machines,” in Proc. 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), pp. 1773–1780, Montreal, QC, 20–24 September 2015.
[14] Z. Chen, Z. Li, H. Ma and Y. Guo, “Optimization and analysis of permanent-magnet synchronous machine with eccentric magnetic pole shape,” in Proc. 18th International Conference on Electrical Machines and Systems (ICEMS), pp. 1181–1186, Pattaya, Tailand, 25–28 October 2015.
[15] M. J. Kramer, R. W. McCallum, I. A. Anderson and S. Constantinides, “Prospects for non-rare earth permanent magnets for traction motors and generators,” JOM, vol. 64, pp. 752–763, 2012.
[16] R. Lacal-Arántegui, “Materials use in electricity generators in wind turbines–state-of-the-art and future specifications,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 87, pp. 275–283, 2015.
[17] S. O. Ani, H. Polinder and J. A. Ferreira, “Comparison of energy yield of small wind turbines in low wind speed areas,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 4, pp. 42–49, (2013).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com