You are here

Home » Content

Kıbrıs’ta Uzlaşma, İşe Yarıyor mu?

Reconciliation in Cyprus, does it work?

Journal Name:

  • International Journal of Humanities and Education

Publication Year:

  • 2017

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Reconciliation can be described as; the process by which conflicted, warring, aggrieved communities agree to resolve their differences and animosities towards each other and come to a mutual understanding to co-exist in peace, to forgive, to abandon the fighting and move on (Musisi, 2010). In this paper the differences between Turkish Cypriot’s and Greek Cypriot’s discourses, chosen traumas and narcissisms of small differences between them will be discussed.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Uzlaşı; çatışmalı, düşman ve hiç bir şekilde bir arada yaşayamayacağını düşünen toplumların çatışmalarını çözümleyip birbirlerini affetmeleri, yeni bir bakış açısına sahip olarak farklılıklarını ve düşmanlıklarını bir tarafa bırakıp, birlikte barış içerisinde yaşamaları, geçmişte olanları affetmeleri ve hayatlarına devam etmeleri olarak tanımlanmaktadır( Musisi, 2010). Bu çalışmada Kıbrıslı Türkler ve Kıbrıslı Rumların, söylemleri, seçilmiş travmaları ve küçük farklılıkların narsisizmleri tartışılacaktır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kibrista-uzlasma-ise-yariyor-mu.pdf
  • 5
90
97
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Açıkses, E., & Cankut, A. (2014). Kıbrıs Meselesinin tarihsel gelişimi ve uluslararası hale gelme sebepleri. Turkish Studies, International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 9(4), 1241-1259.
Ataöv, T.(1998). Narcissism of Minor Differences Nurturing the Clash of Civilization, Paper presented at the International Roundtable "Civilizations - Conflict or Dialogue?" at the University of Innsbruck (Austria), Retrieved from 16 February 2016 http://www.i-p-o.org/ataoev.htm.
96
Okray, Z.
Alexander, J.C., Eyerman, R., & Giesen, B. (2004). Cultural trauma and collective identity. Berkeley, CA, USA, University of California Press.
Beratlı, N. (1997). Kıbrıslı Türklerin tarihî I. Lefkoşa: Galeri Kültür Yayınları,
Beratlı, N. (1999). Kıbrıslı Türklerin tarihî, İngiliz dönemi Cilt 3. Lefkoşa: Galeri Kültür Yayınları,
Çevik, A. (2012-1013). Mağduriyet psikolojisi ve toplumsal yansımaları, 21. Yüzyılda Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, 65-83. Finkel, C. (2006). Osman's dream: the story of the Ottoman empire 1300–1923. London: John Murray. Ignatieff, M.(1997). The warrior’s honor: ethnic war and the modern conscience. London: Chatto & Windus.
Itzkowitz, N., & Volkan V. (2002). Türkler ve Yunanlılar çatışan komşular. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık,
Kalelioğlu, O. (2008). Türk- Yunan ilişkileri ve megali idea. Ankara Üniversitesi Türk İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü Atatürk Yolu Dergisi, 41, 105-123.
Kolstø, Pål (2007). The ‘narcissism of minor differences’ theory. Can it explain genocide and ethnic conflict? A review article. Historia mot strömmen: Kultur och konflikt i det moderna Europa / Karlsson, KlasGöran; Dietsch, Johan; Törnquist-Plewa, Barbara; Zander, Ulf (red.). Carlsson bokförlag, 1-18.
Mjolla-Mellor,S.(2014). Milliyetçilik ve küçük farklılıkların narsisizmi, küçük farklılıkların narsisizmi, 13-26. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık,
Moses, R. (1996). The Perception of the Enemy: A psychoanalytic view, mind & human interaction, 7(1), 37-43. Çeviren: Çevik, Senem B. (2010), Düşman Algısı: Psikolojik bir Analiz. Tarih Okulu, 7, 99-108.
Musisi, S., Okello E.S., & Abbo,C.(2010). Culture and traditional healing in conflict/post-conflict societies. African Journal of Traumatic Stress, 1(2): 80-85.
Oliva, I.T. (2010). An analytical framework for reconciliation process: two case- studies in the context of post-war Bosnia and Herzegovinia. Research Thesis, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Brett, L.(2005). The difference sameness makes. Ethnicities, SAGE Publications, 5 (3), 343-364.
Staub, E. (2006). Reconciliation after genocide, mass killing, or intractable conflict: understanding the roots of violence, psychological recovery, and steps toward a general theory. Political Psychology, 27(6), 867-894.
Van Dijk, T.A. (2000). Ideology and Discourse. A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
Volkan, V. (1979). Symptom formations and character changes due to upheavals of war: examples from Cyprus. Am J Psychother. 33(2), 239-62.
Volkan,V. (1985). The Need to have enemies and allies: a developmental approach, political psychology, 6(2), Special Issue: A Notebook on the Psychology of the U.S.-Soviet Relationship, 219-247.
97
International Journal of Humanities and Education
Volkan, V. (1998, August). Transgenerational Transmissions and chosen trauma: an element of large-group identity. XIII International Congress of Group Psychotherapy. Volkan, V. (2002). Bosnia-Herzegovina: Chosen trauma and its transgenerational transmission. pp 86-97 in Islam and Bosnia: Conflict Resolution and Foreign Policy in Multi-Ethnic States, Ed. M. Shatzmiller. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University. Volkan, V. (2004). Chosen Trauma, the Political Ideology of Entitlement and Violence, Berlin Metting, Germany, Retrieved from 15 February 2016 http://www.vamikvolkan.com/Chosen-Trauma,-the-Political-Ideology-of-Enti....
Volkan, V. (2008). Trauma, identity and search for a solution in Cyprus. Insight Turkey, 10(4), 95-110.
Volkan, V. (2012). Körü Körüne İnanç, Kriz ve Terör Dönemlerinde Geniş Gruplar ve Liderleri. İstanbul: Okuyan Us Yayın.
Volkan,V.(2012). Seçilmiş Travma, Yetkinin Politik İdeolojisi ve Şiddet, http://www.vamikvolkan.com/Se%E7ilmi%FE-Travma,-Yetkinin-Politik-%DDdeol... (15/01/2016).
Yellice, G. (2012). 1878’den 1931’e Kıbrıs’ta enosis talepleri ve İngiltere’nin yaklaşımı. ÇTTAD, 12 (24), 13-26.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com