You are here

Selecting Appropriate Quayside Equipment for Grain Unloading Using TOPSIS and Entropy Shannon Methods

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Now day selection of optimum quay Sid equipment for loading and discharging the dry bulk cargo can maximize the overall efficiency of Terminal. For this end the current applied study was implemented by the aim to choose the best equipment for discharging dry bulk cargoes in BIK Grain terminal using TOPSIS and Shannon entropy method in three phases. In the 1st phase, the most important decision-making criteria for choosing the most appropriate equipment were identified by using experts’ interview and investigating the previous researches and holding brain storm meetings with the Grain Terminal’s experts. Then in the 2nd phase, the weight of every identified criteria using Shannon entropy method, Was determined. The abstained result from Shannon entropy method indicates that service facility criterion with the scale of 0.06 has earned the maximum and operator cost criterion with the scale of 0.034 obtained the least. In the 3rd phase, using scale 1-9 of each equipment regarding shall be scored based on the criteria and according to the obtained scores for each equipment of the decision- making matrix of the TOPSIS method was established and finally, with respect to the weight of each earned criteria, the equipment shall be scored in the 2nd phase and the most optimum shall be selected. The final results from TOPSIS method indicates that unloader with (Ci=0.91346) enjoys the 1st and the vacuum with (Ci=0.26382) the 2nd and grab with (Ci=0.00000) ranks.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
1072-1078

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Jafari, H., “Increase the efficiency Rate of container loading and unloading in the BIK, using Six Sigma method,” Bachelor
Thesis, School of Economics and maritime management, Khorramshahr University of Marine Science and Technology,
2012.
[2] Saeidi, N., Jafari, H., Khosheghbal, B., and AliAlaei, M., “Managing the Causes of Delay in General Cargo Handling
Operation”, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 419-424, 2013.
[3] Yousefi, H., Jafari, H., Rash, K., Khosheghbal, B., and Dadkhah, A., “Evaluation of Causes of Delay in Container Handling
Operation at Lebanese Container Ports (Case Study Beirut Container Terminal)”, International Journal of Accounting and
Financial Management, Vol. 5, December 2012.
[4] Jafari, H., “Identification and Prioritization of Causes of Halt and Lag in Container Handling Operation”, International
Journal of Basic Sciences and Applied Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 345-353, 2013.
[5] Jafari, H., “Increase the Efficiency Rate of Container Loading and Unloading Using Six Sigma Method”, International
Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1438-1447, 2013.
[6] Jafari, H., Noshadi, E. and khosheghbal, B. “Ranking Ports Based on Competitive Indicators by Using ORESTE Method”,
International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1492-1498, 2013.
[7] Hwang, C. and Yoon, K. “Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Application”, Berlin Heidelberg, Springer, pp.
13–25, 1981.
[8] Kabassi, K. and Virvou, M., “A technique for preference ordering for advice generation in an intelligent help system,
Systems”, IEEE International Conference on Man and Cybernetics, vol. 4, pp. 3338-3342, 2004.
[9] Kelemenis, A., and Askounis, D., “A new TOPSIS-based multi-criteria approach to personnel selection”, Expert Systems
with Applications, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 4999-5008, 2010.
[10] M. Zeleny, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.
[11] Shih, H. S., Shyur, H. J., and Lee, E. S., “An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making”, Mathematical and Computer
Modelling, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 801-813, 2007.
[12] Kelemenis, A., and alberta, D., “multi-criteria approach to personnel selection”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.
37, no. 7, pp. 4999-5008, 2010.
[13] Lin, M. C., Wang, C. C., Chen, M. S., and Chang, C. A., “Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product
design process,” Computers in Industry, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 17-31, 2008.
[14] Shanian, A., and Savadogo, O., “TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic
bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell”, Journal of Power Sources, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 1095-1104, 2006.
[15] Shih, H. S., Shyur, H. J., and Lee, E. S. “An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making”, Mathematical and Computer
Modeling, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 801-813, 2007.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com