You are here

Risk of Telemedicine Infeasibility: An Evidential Reasoning Approach

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The viability of a telemedicine system is the strength of its business continuity. Business continuity can only stand if the telemedicine system remains continuously feasible. This article studies telemedicine risk in terms of its feasibility on all its five components: economical, technical, social, operational, and legal/ethical. Any deficiencies in one or more of the feasibility components will affect the system business continuity risk and can lead to infeasibility and possible dissolution. The telemedicine computing environment is full of uncertainties and ambiguities and it just involves too much background knowledge that Bayesian theory cannot accommodate. Decision theory however offers a basic evidence-based multi-criteria decision mechanism that can tackle those decision problems treating both quantitative and qualitative criteria under various uncertainties including ignorance and randomness. We propose an evidential reasoning model to assess a telemedicine business continuity risk based on infeasibility. This business continuity risk is modelled using Dempster and Shafer Theory as the plausibility of infeasibility of the telemedicine system. A numerical example is provided to demonstrate the working of the proposed risk assessment model.
76
86

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Burke, D.E., et al. “Exploring hospitals’ adoption of information technology.” Journal of Medical Systems Vol.
26, No. 4, 2002, pp. 349-55.
[2] Chesanow, Neil. “Do Virtual Patient Visits Increase Your Risk of Being Sued?” Medscape. WebMD LLC. 22
Oct. 2014, https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/833254.
[3] Davis, S. “What’s holding up the telemedicine explosion.” Telephony Online 1998, pp. 66-67.
[4] Menachemi, Nir, Darrell E. Burke, and Douglas J. Ayers. “Factors affecting the adoption of telemedicine-a multiple
adopter perspective.” Journal of Medical Systems Vol. 28, No. 6, 2004, pp. 617-32.
[5] Marta, Mary R. “Telemedicine payment: then and now. (Medicare/Medicaid).” Healthcare Financial Management
Vol. 57, No. 7, 2003, pp. 50-54.
[6] AARC’s Legislative Initiative for 2015 - The Medicare Telehealth Parity Act, Frequently Asked Questions. 20
Feb. 2015, https://www.aarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/telehealth_faq.pdf.
[7] Thomas, Latoya, and Gary Capistrant. “State telemedicine gaps analysis: coverage and reimbursement.” American
Telemedicine Association 2015.
Sofienne Mansouri, et al. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2017, 6(10): 76-86
86
[8] Sundararaman, Ramya, and C. Stephen Redhead. “The Mental Health Parity Act: A Legislative History.” Congressional
Research Service, Library of Congress, 2008.
[9] The National Law Review. National Law Forum, LLC. https://www.natlawreview.com/.
[10] Track the United States Congress! Civic Impulse, LLC. https://www.govtrack.us/. Shafer, Glenn. A Mathematical
Theory of Evidence. Vol. 1. Princeton: Princeton university press, 1976.
[11] Shafer, Glenn, and Rajendra Srivastava. “The Bayesian and belief-function formalisms: A general perspective
for auditing.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory Vol. 9. Supplement, 1990, pp. 110-148.
[12] Srivastava, Rajendra P., and Liping Liu. “Applications of belief functions in business decisions: A review.” Information
Systems Frontiers Vol. 5, No. 4, 2003, pp. 359-78.
[13] Smets, Philippe. “The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern
Analysis and Machine Intelligence Vol. 12, No. 5, 1990, pp. 447-58.
[14] Muirhead, Greg, et al. “An update on telemedicine.” Patient Care Vol. 34, No. 6, 2000, p. 96.
[15] Srivastava, Rajendra P., and T. Mock. “Why we should consider belief functions in auditing research and practice.”
Auditor’s Report Vol. 28, No. 2, 2005, pp. 58-65.
[16] Walters, Edgar. “Doctors, Telemedicine Companies Meet to Plot New Course.” The Texas Tribune. 8 Jun 2016,
https://www.texastribune.org/.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com