You are here

Evaluation of the Cyclic Fatigue of WaveOne Gold and Reciproc Blue using Different Irrigating Medium

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aimed to assess the resistance to cyclic fatigue of reciprocating nickel-titanium (NiTi) files (Wave One Gold and Reciproc Blue) and assess the effect of glyde and sodium hypochlorite 5.25% as a gel and liquid on it during testing. A total of 80 new WaveOne Gold primary and Reciproc Blue R25 were tested. The 40 files of the same brand were randomly assigned into four groups (n=8) and submitted to the irrigating protocol as follows: Group 1: Testing without irrigating media, Group 2: Testing with glyde, Group 3: Testing with sodium hypochlorite 5.25% gel, Group 4: Testing with sodium hypochlorite 5.25% liquid, Group 5: testing with normal saline (control). The cyclic fatigue test was performed using the appropriate preset reciprocating mode (‘RECIPROC ALL’ or ‘WAVEONE ALL’) in a specially designed endodontic motor. Resistance to fracture was determined by recording the time. The instrument tested in stainless artificial canal with 60° angle of curvature and 5 mm radius of curvature. Resistance to cyclic fatigue of the same NiTi was affected by irrigating media. Reciproc Blue R25 was associated with a higher cyclic fatigue resistance in all groups compared to WaveOne Gold Primary. The study concluded that glyde, sodium hypochlorite 5.25% as a gel and as a liquid may reduce the resistance to cyclic fatigue of WaveOne Gold and Reciproc Blue significantly. However, the type of reciprocating instrument influenced cyclic fatigue resistance with Reciproc Blue R25 being more resistant than WaveOne Gold Primary.
27
31

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Serene, Thomas P., J. David Adams, and Ashok Saxena. Nickel-titanium instruments: Applications in endodontics.
Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, 1995.
[2] Plotino, Gianluca, et al. “A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.” Journal of
Endodontics, Vol. 35, No. 11, 2009, pp. 1469-76.
[3] Pruett, John P., David J. Clement, and David L. Carnes. “Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic
instruments.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1997, pp. 77-85.
[4] Martin, B., et al. “Factors influencing the fracture of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.” International Endodontic
Journal, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2003, pp. 262-66.
[5] Peters, Ove A., and Fred Barbakow. “Dynamic torque and apical forces of ProFile. 04 rotary instruments during
preparation of curved canals.” International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2002, pp. 379-89.
Muhammad, et al. Int J Med Res Health Sci 2018, 7(1): 27-31
31
[6] Varela-Patiño, Purificación, et al. “Alternating versus continuous rotation: a comparative study of the effect on
instrument life.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2010, pp. 157-59.
[7] Gambarini, Gianluca, et al. “Fatigue resistance of engine-driven rotary nickel-titanium instruments produced by
new manufacturing methods.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 34, No. 8, 2008, pp. 1003-05.
[8] Sonntag D and Heithecker K. “Korrosion von Nickel-Titan-Instruments.” Endodontie Vol. 15, 2006, pp. 23-30.
[9] Zehnder, Matthias. “Root canal irrigants.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2006, pp. 389-98.
[10] Hülsmann, M., and W. Hahn. “Complications during root canal irrigation–literature review and case
reports.” International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2000, pp. 186-93.
[11] Byström, Anders, and Göran Sundqvist. “Bacteriologic evaluation of the effect of 0.5 percent sodium hypochlorite
in endodontic therapy.” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Vol. 55, No. 3, 1983, pp. 307-12.
[12] Yoshida, Satoshi, et al. “Characterization of a staurosporine-and temperature-sensitive mutant, STT1, of
Saccharomyces cerevisiae: STT1 is allelic to PKC1.” Molecular and General Genetics MGG, Vol. 231, No. 3,
1992, pp. 337-44.
[13] Peters, Ove A., and Frank Paqué. “Current developments in rotary root canal instrument technology and clinical
use: A review.” Quintessence International, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2010.
[14] Larsen, C. Michael, et al. “Cyclic fatigue analysis of a new generation of nickel titanium rotary instruments.” Journal
of Endodontics, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2009, pp. 401-03.
[15] Topçuoğlu, Hüseyin Sinan, et al. “In vitro comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Next, HyFlex CM,
OneShape, and ProTaper Universal instruments in a canal with a double curvature.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol.
42, No. 6, 2016, pp. 969-71.
[16] Ferreira, F., et al. “Movement kinematics and cyclic fatigue of NiTi rotary instruments: a systematic
review.” International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2017, pp. 143-52.
[17] Ye, Jia, and Yong Gao. “Metallurgical characterization of M-Wire nickel-titanium shape memory alloy used for
endodontic rotary instruments during low-cycle fatigue.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2012, pp. 105-07.
[18] Condorelli, G.G., et al. “Improvement of the fatigue resistance of NiTi endodontic files by surface and bulk
modifications.” International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 43, No. 10, 2010, pp. 866-73.
[19] O’hoy, P.Y.Z., H.H. Messer, and J.E.A. Palamara. “The effect of cleaning procedures on fracture properties and
corrosion of NiTi files.” International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 36, No. 11, 2003, pp. 724-32.
[20] Berutti, E., et al. “Influence of sodium hypochlorite on fracture properties and corrosion of ProTaper Rotary
instruments.” International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 39, No. 9, 2006, pp. 693-99.
[21] El-Naghy, A.M., and S.E. Elsaka. “Effect of sodium hypochlorite and saline on cyclic fatigue resistance of
WaveOne Gold and Reciproc reciprocating instruments.” International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 50, No. 10,
2017, pp. 991-98.
[22] Ametrano, G., et al. “Effects of sodium hypochlorite and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid on rotary nickeltitanium
instruments evaluated using atomic force microscopy.” International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 44, No.
3, 2011, pp. 203-09.
[23] Pedullà, Eugenio, et al. “Cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium instruments after immersion in irrigant
solutions with or without surfactants.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 40, No. 8, 2014, pp. 1245-49.
[24] Kim, Hyeon-Cheol, et al. “Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used
in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2012, pp. 541-44.
[25] Keskin, Cangül, et al. “Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, and WaveOne Gold Reciprocating
Instruments.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 43, No. 8, 2017, pp. 1360-63.
[26] Pirani, C., et al. “HyFlex EDM: Superficial features, metallurgical analysis and fatigue resistance of innovative
electro discharge machined NiTi rotary instruments.” International Endodontic Journal, Vol. 49, No. 5, 2016,
pp. 483-93.
[27] Kaval, Mehmet Emin, Ismail Davut Capar, and Hüseyin Ertas. “Evaluation of the cyclic fatigue and torsional
resistance of novel nickel-titanium rotary files with various alloy properties.” Journal of Endodontics, Vol. 42,
No. 12, 2016, pp. 1840-43.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com