You are here

Prospect of Dry Land Corn Development in South Lembeh

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Government programs to make the region agropolitan Bitung Municipality, must be balanced with the development of dry land crops. Potential land for dry land crops in South Lembeh is available. These regions include dry climate. Volcanic Landform occupying dry land. Soil on Landform was formed from volcanic materials, consisting of Humic Eutrudepts, Humic Dystrudepts, and Typic Hapludalfs. Only a small part of the total dry land is used for dry land crops, so it is an opportunity to improve productivity dry land agriculture in South Lembeh
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
43-47

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Djaenudin, D., Marwan H., A. Hidayat dan H. Subagyo, 2003. Petunjuk Teknis Evaluasi Lahan untuk Komoditas Pertanian. Balitanah, Puslitbangtanak, Badan Litbang Pertanian. ISBN: 979-9474-27-2
[2] Karamoy Lientje Theffie, 2012. Penelitian Sumberdaya Lahan daerah Lembeh Selatan
[3] Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian (BPTP)-Sulawesi Utara, 2006. Analisis Zona Agroekologi Di Sulawesi Utara Skala 1: 50.000 Di Kabupaten Minahasa Utara, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian
[4] Djaenudin, D., 2008. Prospek Penelitian Potensi Sumberdaya Lahan di Wilayah Indonesia. Orasi Pengukuhan Profesor Riset Bidang Pedologi dan Penginderaan Jarak Jauh. Badan Litbang Pertanian Deptan - LIPI. ISBN: 978-602-8039-07-9
[5] Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika, 1998-2010. Data unsur iklim. Stasiun Meteorologi Maritim Bitung
[6] Oldeman, L.R, and Darmiyati S., 1977. The Agroclimatic Map of Sulawesi, scale 1: 2,500,000. Contr. Centre. Res. Inst. Agric. Bulletin No.60, Bogor.
[7] FAO. 1996. Agroecological Zoning Guidelines. FAO Soil Bulletin 73. Rome Italy.
[8] Wambeke, A. R, Van., P. Hastings, and P. Tolomeo. 1985. New Simulation Model (NSM) for Moisture Regimes. Dep. Agr. Bradfield Hall. Cornell University. NY.
[9] Soil Survey Staff, 2003. Key to Soil Taxonomy. USDA. Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS). Ninth Edition, 2003. Washington, D. C
[10] Kannegieter, A., and H. Huizing, 1983. Aspect of Agriculture. Lecture Notes N.-2 Rural Survey Course ITC Enschede The Netherlands
[11] Wilding, L. P., N. E. Smeck, and G. F. Hall, 1983. Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy. Concepts and Interactions. Developments in Soil Science 11 A
[12] Desaunettes, JR, 1977. Catalogue of Landforms for Indonesia. Examples of a Physiography Approach to Land Evaluation for Agricultural Development. SRI-FAO. AGL/TF/INS/44. Working Paper No. 13
[13] Marsoedi, Ds., Widagdo, J. Dai, N. Suharta, Darul SWP, S. Hardjowigeno, J. Hof dan E.R. Jordens.1997. Pedoman Klasifikasi Landform. Versi 3.0. LREP II, Part C. CSAR, Bogor
[14] Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Key to Soil Taxonomy. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Services.pp. 338.
[15] Hendrisman M., Hikmatulloh dan D. Djaenudin, 2005. Analisis Topografi dari Citra Landsat-7 ETM; Studi Kasus Daerah Sidangoli-Sofifi, Halmahera. Pros. Puslittbangtanak ISBN. 979-9474-49-35. Hal. 223-239
[16] Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian (BPTP)-Sulawesi Utara, 2006. Analisis Zona Agroekologi Di Sulawesi Utara Skala 1: 50.000 Di Kabupaten Minahasa Utara, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pertanian Departemen Pertanian
[17] Sys C., E. Van Ranst, J. Debaveye, and F Beernaert, 1993. Land Evaluation Part III. Agric. Public. No 7. Brussels – Belgium
[18] Badan Pusat Statistik, 2007. Statistik Indonesia. Statistical Yearbook of Indonesia. Jakarta - Indonesia. 315.598. ISSN: 0126-29132. No. Publ: 06300.0708. Katalog BPS: 1401.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com