You are here

Assessment of ICT Contribution to the Learning Process

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study undertaken in both naturalistic and experimental conditions aimed at assessing objectively the use of ICT by students whilst attending an academic lecture and to gauge the disturbance effect of ICT use on the learning process. Observations were carried out from end 2012 to end 2014 in a UK university (N=596, MSc, Human Sc. discipline) distributed in 11 sessions in order to objectify the level of students’ ICT use. Then an experiment was carried out in laboratory with a sample of these students (N=40) to assess the disturbance of ICT on learning process depending on frequency of use of ICT and their nature (class related or not), dividing the sample in 3 groups: control group1 (not disturbed), group 2 (disturbed by web class related resource) and group 3 (distracted by exchanging messages on mobile phone). Groups 2 and 3 were distracted at a controlled frequency equal to 30 occ/h. Performance assessment in 19 points was based on the revised Bloom’s taxonomy complemented by an ontology-based assessment technique. We found out that 63% of students used ICT during academic lectures and that groups 1 and 2 had similar performance while group 3 significantly had poorer performance (p<.001). Results were explained in the light of the Information Processing theory and Mayer and Moreno’s model developed for multimedia learning. These results identified a threshold for ICT use and warned teachers (resp. students) about an abusive use of ICT to support lessons (resp. about non-class related use of ICT).
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
1
10

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] K. K., Myers, and K. Sadaghiani, “Millennials in the workplace: A communication perspective on millennials’ organizational relationships and performance”. Journal of Business and Psychology, vol.25(2), 2010, pp.225-238.
[2] E. Dahlstrom, J. D. Walker, and C. Dziuban, ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2012. Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research. 2012.
[3] C. B. Fried, “In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning”. Computers and Education, vol.50(3), 2008, pp.906-914.
[4] Ph. Fauquet-Alekhine, “Informationand Communication Technologies vs Education and Training: Contribution to understand the Millennials’ generational effect”, Proc. of the International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Electronics and Communication Engineering, Venezia, IT, vol.80, 2013, August, pp.358-363
[5] Ph. Fauquet-Alekhine, “Learners’ behavior in teaching context: characterizing the use of Information and Communication Technologies”, Proceedings of the 1st International Science and Applied Research Conference Social Psychology in Education Space, Moscow, Russia, 2013, October, pp.262-264 .
[6] D. K. Duncan, A. R. Hoekstra, and B. R. Wilcox, “Digital devices, distraction, and student performance: Does In-Class cell phone use reduce learning?”. Astronomy education review, vol.11(1), 2012, pp.010108.
[7] A. Demb, D. Erickson, and S. Hawkins-Wilding, “The laptop alternative: Student reactions and strategic implications”. Computers and Education, vol.43(4), 2004, pp.383-401.
[8] D. M. Sanbonmatsu, D. L. Strayer, N. Medeiros-Ward, and J. M. Watson, “Who multi-tasks and why? Multi-tasking ability, perceived multi-tasking ability, impulsivity, and sensation seeking”. PloS one, vol.8(1), 2013, pp.e54402.
[9] E. Ophir, C. Nass, and A. D. Wagner, “Cognitive control in media multitaskers”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.106(37), 2009, pp.15583-15587.
[10] D. L. Strayer, J. M. Watson, and F. A. Drews, “Cognitive distraction while multitasking in the automobile”. Psychology of Learning and Motivation-Advances in Research and Theory, vol.54, 2011, pp.29-58.
[11] P. Moskal, C. Dziuban, and J. Hartman, “Blended learning: A dangerous idea?”. The Internet and Higher Education, vol.18, 2013, pp.15-23.
[12] F. Sana, T. Weston, and N. J. Cepeda, “Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers”. Computers and Education, vol.62, 2013, pp.24-31.
[13] H. Li, Y. Cui, X. Bai, and S. Davis, “The Impact of Web browsing on classroom learning performance”. Issues in Information Systems, vol.11, 2010, pp.460-466
International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations, Volume 4, Issue 40, May 2015 9
www.IJSEI.com Paper ISSN: 2251-8843 ID: 44015-01
[14] K. D. Su, “An Intensive ICT-Integrated environmental learning strategy for enhancing student performance”. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, vol.6(1), 2011, pp.39-58.
[15] R. L. Bannerman, E. V.Temminck, , and A. Sahraie, “Emotional stimuli capture spatial attention but do not modulate spatial memory”. Vision research, vol.65, 2012, pp.12-20.
[16] M. Chan, and A. Singhal, (2013). “The emotional side of cognitive distraction: implications for road safety”. Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol.50, pp.147-154.
[17] E.A. Kensinger, and S. Corkin, “Memory enhancement for emotional words: are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words?”, Memory and Cognition vol.31, 2003, pp.1169-1180.
[18] T. Sharot, E.A. Phelps, “How arousal modulates memory: disentangling the effects of attention and retention”. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, vol.4, 2004, pp.294-306.
[19] D. Talmi, A.K. Anderson, L. Riggs, J.B. Caplan, and M. Moscovitch, “Immediate memory consequences of the effect of emotion on attention to pictures”. Learning and Memory, vol.15, 2008, pp.172-182.
[20] J. M. Kraushaar, and D. C. Novak, “Examining the effects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture”. Journal of Information Systems Education, vol.21, 2010, pp.241-251.
[21] S. P. Banbury, W. J. Macken, , S. Tremblay, and D. M. Jones, “Auditory distraction and short-term memory: Phenomena and practical implications”. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, vol.43(1), 2001, pp.12-29.
[22] K. H. Bäuml, S. Hanslmayr, B. Pastötter, and W. Klimesch, “Oscillatory correlates of intentional updating in episodic memory”. NeuroImage, vol.41(2), 2008, pp.596-604.
[23] K. M. Divis, and A. S. Benjamin, “Retrieval speeds context fluctuation: Why semantic generation enhances later learning but hinders prior learning”. Memory and cognition, vol.42(7), 2014, pp.1049-1062.
[24] E. Dhooge, W. D. Baene, and R. J. Hartsuiker, “A late locus of the distractor frequency effect in picture–word interference: Evidence from event-related potentials”. Brain and language, vol.124(3), 2013, pp.232-237.
[25] A. Andreopoulos, and J. K. Tsotsos, “50 Years of object recognition: Directions forward”. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol.117(8), 2013, pp.827-891.
[26] D. J. Schwerha, S. F. Wiker, and M. Jaraiedi, “Effect of distractors, age, and level of education upon psychomotor task learning”. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol.37(9), 2007, pp.801-809.
[27] G. M. Fitch, S. A. Soccolich, F. Guo, J. McClafferty, Y. Fang, R. L. Olson, ... and T. A. Dingus, The impact of hand-held and hands-free cell phone use on driving performance and safety-critical event risk. (No. DOT HS 811 757). 2013.
[28] S. G. Hosking, K. L. Young, and M. A. Regan, The effect of text messaging on young novice drivers performance. (Accident research center. Monash Un. Report No. : 246). 2006.
[29] C. J. Patten, A. Kircher, J. Östlund, and L. Nilsson, “Using mobile telephones: cognitive workload and attention resource allocation”. Accident analysis and prevention, vol.36(3), 2004, pp.341-350.
[30] A. Roelofs, V. Piai, and H. Schriefers, “Selective attention and distractor frequency in naming performance: Comment on Dhooge and Hartsuiker (2010)”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, vol.37(4), 2011, pp.1032-1038.
[31] R. Rosenberger, “An argument against ‘No-Look Texting’ while driving”. Technology and Society Magazine, IEEE, vol.32(1), 2013, pp.53-59.
[32] H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay, “ The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments”. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, vol.15(1), 2003, pp.46-64.
[33] Y. Ellis, B. Daniels, and A. Jauregui, “The effect of multitasking on the grade performance of business students”. Research in Higher Education Journal, vol.8(1). 2010.
[34] L. L. Bowman, L. E. Levine, B. M. Waite, and M. Gendron, “Can students really multitask? An experimental study of instant messaging while reading”. Computers and Education, vol.54(4), 2010, pp.927-931.
[35] E. Wood, L. Zivcakova, P. Gentile, K. Archer, D. De Pasquale, and A. Nosko, “Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning”. Computers and Education, vol.58(1), 2012, pp.365-374.
[36] A. D. Froese, C. N. Carpenter, D. A. Inman, J. R. Schooley, R. B. Barnes, P. W. Brecht, and J. D. Chacon, “Effects of classroom cell phone use on expected and ectual learning”. College Student Journal, vol.46(2), 2012, pp.323-332.
[37] J. H. Kuznekoff, and S. Titsworth, “The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning”, Communication Education, vol.62(3), 2013, pp.233-252.
[38] H. Pashler, S. H. Kang, and R. Y. Ip, (2013). “Does multitasking impair studying? Depends on Timing”. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol.27(5), pp.593-599.
[39] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill, and D. R. Krathwohl, Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals; Handbook I: Cognitive Domain”. New York, Longmans, Green. 1956.
[40] D. R. Krathwohl, “A revision of bloom's taxonomy: An overview”, Theory into Practice, vol.41(4), 2002, pp.212-218.
[41] T. Gavrilova, E. Strakhovitch, and I. Leshcheva, “Ontologies for project management teaching”. Joint Proceedings of the Work-in-Progress Poster and Invited Young Researcher Symposium at the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education. Putrajaya, Malaysia, 2010, pp.7-9.
[42] I. Leshcheva, D. Gorovaya, and D. Leshchev, “Ontology-based Assessment Technique”, Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Semantic Web Applications in Higher Education (SemHE'10), Southampton, UK. 2010, November-December. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/271753/1/semhe10-leshcheva-et-al.pdf
[43] S. Grussendorf, Device ownership, ‘BYOD’ and social media for learning. London: LSE CLT/IMT report. 2013.
[44] L. D. Rosen, A. F. Lim, L. M. Carrier, and N. A. Cheever, “An empirical examination of the educational impact of text message-induced task switching in the classroom: Educational implications and strategies to enhance learning”. Psicología Educativa, vol.17(2), 2011, pp.63-177.
[45] K. Foerde, B. J. Knowlton, and R. A. Poldrack, “Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol.103(31), 2006, pp.11778-11783.
[46] R. E. Mayer, and R. Moreno, “Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning”. Educational psychologist, vol.38(1), 2003, pp.43-52.
[47] C.D. Wickens, Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (vol. 2). New York: HarperCollins. 1992.
[48] C.D. Wickens, and J.G. Hollands, Engineering psychology and Human Performance (third ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 2000.
[49] S. Y. Mousavi, R. Low, and J. Sweller, “Reducing cognitive load by mixing auditory and visual presentation modes”. Journal of educational psychology, vol.87(2), 1995, pp.319-334.
[50] A. Liebl, J. Haller, B. Jödicke, H. Baumgartner, S. Schlittmeier, and J. Hellbrück, “Combined effects of acoustic and visual distraction on cognitive performance and well-being”. Applied ergonomics, vol.43(2), 2012, pp.424-434.
[51] Y. Diao, P. Chandler, and J. Sweller, “The effect of written text on comprehension of spoken English as a foreign language”. The American journal of psychology, 2007, pp.237-261.
[52] M. S. Gökalp, “Perceptions of the internet and education: A study with Physics education website users”. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 8(2), 2013, pp.289-302.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com