You are here

Comparative Study of Different Configurations of Fuel Oil Heat Exchanger

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Fuel Oil heat exchanger used in aircraft’s fuel system in order to prevent the formation of ice due to residual water in fuel is a shell-tube heat exchanger. This paper is a comparative study of shell and tube heat exchanger with segmented baffles and helical baffles to obtain maximum heat transfer characteristics. The Cold fluid used in the FOHE is the Jet-a fuel. 3D model and flow volume extraction was done using CATIA for the two different baffles. Since we are comparing the performance of segmented and helical baffles, we have simplified the analysis model and compared with only cold fluid domain and applied the temperature of the hot fluid to the hot pipe walls. For the given mass flow rate of the cold fluid, heat transfer rate and pressure drop were analyzed for the segmented and helical baffles and reported in this article. Analysis results from Ansys Fluent showed that the pressure drop is less with better heat transfer in helical baffles than the segmented baffles.
63
68

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Emerson, W.H., “Shell-side pressure drop and heat transfer with turbulent flow in segmental baffled shell-tube heat exchangers”, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 6 ,1963, pp. 649–66.
[2] Haseler, L.E., Wadeker, V.V., Clarke, R.H., "Flow Distribution Effect in a Plate and Frame Heat Exchanger", IChemE Symposium Series, No. 129, 1992,pp. 361-367.
[3] Diaper, A.D. and Hesler, L.E.,"Cross flow Pressure Drop and Flow Distributions within a Tube Bundle Using Computational Fluid Dynamic", Proc. 9th Proc. 9th Heat Transfer Conf., Israel, 1990,pp.235-240.
[4] Jian-Fei Zhang, Ya-Ling He, Wen-Quan Tao, “3d numerical simulation of shell and tube heat exchanger with middle-overlapped helical baffle”, a journal, School of energy and power engineering, china.
International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations, Volume 5, Issue 58, November 2016 68
www.IJSEI.com Paper ISSN: 2251-8843 ID: 55816-10
[5] Li, H., Kottke, “Effect of baffle spacing on pressure drop and local heat transfer in shell and tube heat exchangers for staggered tube arrangement”, source book on Int.J. Heat Mass Transfer 41,1998, 10, pp. 1303–1311.
[6] Thirumarimurugan, M., Kannadasan, T., Ramasamy, E., Performance Analysis of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Using miscible System, American Journal of Applied Sciences 5,2008, pp. 548-552.
[7] Usman Ur Ehman , Goteborg, Sweden, Master’s Thesis 2011:09 on “Heat Transfer Optimization of Shell-and-Tube & Heat Exchanger through CFD”,2011.
[8] LAPPEENRANTA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, Faculty of Technology, LUT Energy, “Heat Exchanger Dimensioning”
[9] P.A.HILTON LTD, Experimental Operating and Maintenance Procedures Optional Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger, H101CM/E/1/001, MAY 04.
[10] Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association, “Standards of the Tubular Exchanger Manufacturers Association,” 7th ed., TEMA, New York ,1988.
[11] Mukherjee, R., “Don’t Let Baffling Baffle You,” Chem. Eng. Progress, 92 (4),Apr. 1996,pp. 72–79.
[12] Mukherjee, R., “Use Double- Segmental Baffles in Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers,”Chem. Eng. Progress, 88(11),Nov. 1992,pp. 47–52.
[13] Tinker, T., “Shell side Characteristics of Shell-and-tube Heat Exchangers: A Simplified Rating System for Commercial Heat Exchangers,” Trans. ASME, 80,1958,pp. 36–52.
[14] Gang Yong Lei, Ya Ling He , Effects of Baffle inclination angle on flow and heat transfer of heat exchanger with helical baffle, Science Direct Chemical Engineering Processing,2008, pp.1-10.
[15] Bashir Master, K. Chunangad, “Fouling Mitigation using Helixchanger heat exchanger”, Fundamentals and Applications,2003,pp. 312-317.
[16] Kothandaraman C. P. “Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer”,pp. 521.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com