You are here

Measured and Predicted Wetting Patterns under Subsurface Drip Irrigation

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
A series of field experiments were carried out in sandy clay loam soil to determine the wetting pattern following irrigation from a line source in subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) system in the horizontal and vertical directions. In each experiment 10m of drip tube was buried at 20 cm below soil surface with 0.3m spacing between emitters. Irrigation water was applied at three different irrigation durations; 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 hours. Five volumetric water content sensors (Decagon Devices Inc. 2365 NE Hopkins Court, Pullman, WA 99163) were installed at each of (10, 20, 30, 40 and 50) cm depths below the soil surface for water content measurements. In this study a zero distance is represent by a sensor located exactly at the source emitter (SE) of measurements and the horizontal distances 7.5 and 15 cm represent the locations of two sensors installed on both sides of the SE. Hydrus 2D program was used to simulate two dimensional pattern of moisture front during 24hour after starting irrigation. At 20cm depth and 2.5 hour irrigation duration the results indicated a horizontal progress of the wetting front to 7.5 and 15.0cm after 5.0 and 10 minutes from the start of irrigation, respectively. While initial water content (0.07cm3.cm-3) at the SE increased to 0.42 cm3.cm-3 after 5 minutes, values increased to 0.24 and 0.19 cm3.cm-3 at 7.5 and 15cm after 10 and 45 minutes, respectively. Measured water content at the minutes 1440th attained constant values (0.29 cm3.cm-3) in the horizontal domain at 10, 20 and 40cm, 0.32 cm3.cm-3 at 30cm and no change occurred in at 50cm. At 10cm depth moisture front attained 7.5 and 15cm after 45 and 120 minutes respectively. Water content values after 150 minutes were 0.42, 0.38 and 0.19cm3.cm-3 for 0.0, 7.5 and 15cm respectively. When irrigation time increased to 5 and 10hours the moisture front moved to deeper depths with similar moisture distribution patterns were obtained in the horizontal domain, however differences must be originated from heterogeneity in soil profile. The results showed excellent agreement between measured and simulated water content values by Hydrus 2D program with highest R2 values of 0.983, 0.967 and 0.986 and lower RMSE values of 0.008, 0.016 and 0.007 for experience 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The results also showed excellent agreement between values of measured, 25, 65 and 105cm after 2.5, 5 and 10 hours, and values of simulated, 30, 92 and 110cm depths of moisture after 24 hour, where the depth of the moisture front below SE increased with increasing irrigation time. Hydrus 2D program can precisely predict water distribution and redistribution process and can be used as a designing tool for water management practices in the SDI systems.
169
176

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Al-Ghobari, H. M., and M. S. A. El Marazky. 2012. Surface and subsurface irrigation systems wetting patterns as affected by irrigation scheduling techniques in an arid region. African Journal of Agricultural Research Vol. 7(44), pp. 5962-5976, 20 November, 2012.
[2] Brooks, R. H., and T. A. Corey. 1964. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Hydrol. Paper no. 3 , Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO, USA.
[3] Balendonck, J., M.A. Bruins., M.R. Wattimena., W. Voogt and A. Huys, 2005. WET-sensor Pore Water EC Calibration for Three Horticultural Soils. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 691: International Conference on Sustainable Greenhouse Systems – Green sys 2004.
[4] Dumer, W., (1994). Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure. Water Resource. Res., vol.32, no. 9, pp. 211-223.
[5] Gardenas, A., Hopmans, J.W., Hanson, B.R., Simunek, J., 2005. Two-dimensional modeling of nitrate leaching for various fertigation scenarios under micro irrigation. Agric. Water Manage. 74, 219–242.
[6] Hanson, B., Schwankl, L. & Fulton, A. (2004). Scheduling Irrigations: When and how much water to apply. Water Management Series publication number 3396. Davis, California, Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California.
[7] Kandelous, M.M., and J. Šimůnek. 2010b. Numerical simulations of water movement in a subsurface drip irrigation system under field and laboratory conditions using HYDRUS-2D. Agric. Water Manage. 97:1070–1076.
[8] Lazarovitch N, Warrick AW, Furman A, Simunek. J, 2007. Subsurface water distribution from drip irrigation described by moment analyses. Vadose Zone. J. 6:116–123 .
[9] Kosugi K., (1996)." Lognormal distribution model for unsaturated soil hydraulic properties," Water Resource. Res., vol.32, no. 9,pp. 2697-2703.
[10] Richards, L.A. 1931. Capillary conduction of fluid through porous mediums. Physics 1:318–333.
[11] Schaap, M. G., Leij, F. J., and van Genuchten, M. Th., Rosetta: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions, J. of Hydrol., 251, 163-176, 2001.
[12] Simunek, J., M . Sejna and M. Th. van Genuchten,. 1999. The HYDRUS-2D software package for simulating the two-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media.’’ IGWMC-TPS 53, Version 2.0, International Ground Water Model.
[13] Šimůnek, J., M. Šejna, and M.Th . van Genuchten. 2006. The HYDRUS software package for simulating two- and three-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media. Technical Manual, Version 1.0. PC Progress, Prague, Czech Republic.
[14] Šimůnek, J., M.Th. van Genuchten, and M. Šejna. 2008. The HYDRUS-1D Software Package for Simulating the One-Dimensional Movement of Water, Heat, and Multiple Solutes in Variably-Saturated Media. Technical Manual, Version 4.08. PC Progress, Prague, Czech Republic.
International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations, Volume 5, Issue 55, August 2016 176
www.IJSEI.com Paper ID: 55516-22
ISSN: 2251-8843
[15] Singh, D.K., T.B.S. Rajput, O.K. Singh, H.S. Sikarwar, R.N. Sahoo, and T. Ahmad. 2006. Simulation of Soil Wetting Pattern with Subsurface Drip Irrigation from Line Source. Agric. Water Manage. 83:130-134.
[16] Skaggs T.H., T.J. Trout, J. Šimůnek, and P.J. Shouse. 2004. Comparison of HYDRUS-2D simulations of drip irrigation with experimental observations. Journal. Irrigation and Drain. Eng. 130:304-310.
[17] Van Genuchten, M. Th., (1980). A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils," Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., vol. 44, pp. 892-898.
[18] Vogel, T., and Cislerova, M. 1988. On the reliability of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity calculated from the moisture retention curve. Transport in Porous Media, vol. 3, pp. l-15.
[19] Wang, F.X., Kang, Y., Liu, S.P., 2006. Effects of drip irrigation frequency on soil wetting pattern and potato growth in North China Plain. Agric. Water Manage. 79, 248–264.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com