You are here

Home » Content

Greenhouse Gases Emission Inventory of a Coal-Fired Power Plant-Case Study: “A” Company, Indonesia

Journal Name:

  • International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations

Publication Year:

  • 2017

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
“A” Company is a power station that uses fossil fuels such as coal and petroleum to produce high-pressure steam to generate electricity. The “A” Power Plant has 800 MW/day capacity for Unit 1 and 2. Pollutants generated from power generation activities consist of conventional pollutants (CO, SOx, PM, HC) and greenhouse gases (CO2, CH4, N2O, NOx). However, this study aims to calculate total emission of greenhouse gases (GHG) in CO2eq both from stationary sources and from mobile sources in 2016. The inventory method used in this study was based on Tier 1 and Tier 2 for stationary sources and Tier 2 for mobile sources. The total emission load generated from the stationary source is 4,359 kTon CO2eq and the total emission load generated from the mobile source is 2.905 kTon CO2eq. The biggest pollutant source was Stack Boiler Unit 1 and Unit 2. These power plant has implemented efforts to reduce the amount of greenhouse gas emissions generated such pollutant controller and optimization of Green Space around power plant units.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-greenhouse-gases-emission-inventory-coal-fired-power-plant-case-study-company-indonesia.pdf
  • 10
73
77
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] I. Suherman, “Current and Future Condition of Coal in Indonesia,” in Proceedings of Mining Colloquium, 2009.
[2] Intergovernmental Paner on Climate Change, “2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Volume 2, Energy,” 2006.
[3] Cefic-ECTA, “Guidelines for Measuring and Managing CO2 Emission from Freight Transport Operations,” Eur. Chem. Ind. Counc., no. 1, p. 19, 2011.
[4] S. Notosiswoyo and I. Iskandar, “Contribution of Coal Mine and Coal Fired Power Plant to CO 2 -Emission in Indonesia,” J. Nov. Carbon Resour., vol. 4, no. 2010, pp. 17–20, 2011.
[5] IEA, “World Energy Outlook,” 2015.
[6] Y. Chang, R. Huang, R. J. Ries, and E. Masanet, “Life-cycle comparison of greenhouse gas emissions and water consumption for coal and shale gas fi red power generation in China,” Energy, vol. 86, pp. 335–343, 2015.
[7] B. Hu and H. Zhai, “International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control The cost of carbon capture and storage for coal- fi red power plants in China,” Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control, vol. 65, no. January, pp. 23–31, 2017.
[8] J. Squalli, “Renewable energy , coal as a baseload power source , and greenhouse gas emissions : Evidence from U . S . state-level data,” Energy, vol. 127, pp. 479–488, 2017.
[9] K. H. Biß et al., “Integrated assessment of a phase-out of coal- fi red power plants in Germany,” vol. 126, no. August 2015, 2017.
[10] E. Jeon, S. Myeong, J. Sa, J. Kim, and J. Jeong, “Greenhouse gas emission factor development for coal-fired power plants in Korea,” Appl. Energy, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 205–210, 2010.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com