You are here

Comparing the Effects of Squeeze Casting on the Mechanical Properties of Selected Aluminum Alloys

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study has detailed the changes in mechanical properties of selected aluminium alloys when produced using the method of squeeze casting as compared with conventional gravity castings. The alloys that were studied are: Al-12wt.%Si, Al-12wt.%Si with sodium modifier, Al-1.3wt.%Cu-5wt.%Si-0.5wt.%Mg and Al-4.5wt.%Cu. The squeeze pressure was varied over a range of 50 MPa. The results and measurements show a marked improvement in ultimate tensile strength, ductility and hardness for samples produced by the method of squeeze casting as compared to the gravity cast samples. For instance, at 50 MPa, the ultimate tensile strength of the Al-4.5wt.%Cu alloy was found to be 60% higher than that of the same alloy produced by the conventional procedure of gravity casting. The trend was found to be similar for the other mechanical properties and alloys studied and these have been presented in the work. Further, material properties were seen to improve in all the alloys studied as cast pressure increased with the optimal pressure being in the neighbourhood of 50 MPa.
41
46

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Okorafor O. E. (2007), Foundry Technology, M. C. Computer Press, Nnewi, Nigeria.
[2] Obiekea K., Aku S. Y and Yawas D. S. (2012). Influence of Pressure on the Mechanical Properties and Grain Refinement of Die Cast Aluminum A1350 Alloy. Advances in Applied Science Research, 3 (6), pp. 3663 – 3673.
[3] Kurz W, Fisher D. J. (1989) Fundamentals of Solidification, 3rd ed., Trans. Tech. Publ., Switzerland.
[4] Ghomashchi M. R., Vikrov A. (2000). “Squeeze Casting: An Overview”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 101:1-9.
[5] Anson J. P. and Gruzleski J. E. (2000). Effect of Hydrogen content on relative shrinkage and gas microporosity in Al-7%Si casting. AFS Transactions, pp. 135 – 141.
[6] Haizhi, Y. (2003). An overview of the development of Al-Si-Alloy Based Material for Engine Applications. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 12(3), pp. 288 – 297.
0
1
2
3
4
0
20
40
60
Elongation%
Squeeze Presure (MPa)
Al-12%Si
unmodified
Al-12%Si Na
modified
Al-1.3%Cu-
5%Si-0.5Mg
Al-4.5%Cu
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Rockwell Hardness
Squeeze Presure (MPa)
Al-12%Si
unmodified
Al-12%Si Na
modified
Al-1.3%Cu-5%Si-
0.5% Mg
Al-4.5%Cu
International Journal of Science and Engineering Investigations, Volume 6, Issue 63, April 2017 46
www.IJSEI.com Paper ID: 66317-06
ISSN: 2251-8843
[7] Chaterje B. and Das A. A. (1973). The British Foundryman, volume 14, p. 118
[8] Zyska A., Konopka Z., Lagiewka M. (2007). The solidification of squeeze cast AlCu4Ti alloy. Archives of Foundry Engineering, 7(4), pp. 193 – 196.
[9] Zyska A., Konopka Z., Lagiewka M. and Nadolski M. (2011). The influence of modification and squeeze casting on properties of AlSi11 alloy castings. Archives of Foundry Engineering, 11(2), pp. 153 – 156.
[10] Dispinar D., Campbell J. (2007). J. Mater. Process. Technol., 182, p. 955. Doi:10.1016/j.matprotec.2006.08.021
[11] Murat, L. H., (2012). Effect of casting parameters on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Squeeze Cast A380 Aluminum die cast Alloy. Kovove Materials Journal. Vol. 50, pp. 243 – 250.
[12] Ozer G., Guler K. A. and Murat H. L. (2012). Effects of squeeze pressure on microstructure, porosity and hardness of an in-situ Mg2Si/Al-Si-Cu composite. Materials Testing, 54.
[13] Brown R. (1999). 'Foseco Non-Ferrous Foundryman’s Handbook', 11th edn; Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
[14] Choong D. L. (2008). “Variability in the Tensile Properties of Squeeze-cast Al–Si– CuAlloy A488: 296–302.
[15] Mrowka-Nowotnik G. and Sieniawski J. (2011). Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of C355.0 Cast Aluminum Alloy. International Scientific Journal of Archives of Materials Science and Engineering 47(2): 85-94.
[16] Surappa, M. K., Blank, E. W., and Jaquet, J. C.(1986). "Effect of Macro-Porosity on the Strength and Ductility of Cast Al-7Si-0.3Mg Alloy," Scripta Metallurgica, 20:1281-1286.
[17] Raji A. and Khan R. H. (2006). Comparative Analysis of Al.8%Si Alloy Produced by Squeeze Casting and Chill Casting. Journal of Material Science and Engineering 121(3): 101-106.
[18] Higgins, R. A. (1983). Properties of Engineering Materials, Hodder and Stoughton Educational, Bungay, Suffolk. Pp. 56-223.
[19] Rana R. S., Rajesh P. and Das S. (2012). Reviews of the Influences of Alloying Elements on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloys and Aluminum Alloy Composites. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 2(6):1-7.
[20] Masoumi, M. and Henry, H. (2011). Influence of Applied Pressure on Microstructure and Tensile Properties of Squeeze cast Magnesium Mg-Al-Ca Alloy. Material Science and Engineering A, Vol. 528, pp. 3589 – 3593.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com