You are here

Evaluation of Thermal Comfort of Men and Women in Food Courts

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The objective of this study was to evaluate the thermal comfort in both genders in food courts of commercial buildings located at tropical humid climate, by surveying environmental variables (air temperature, mean radiant temperature, relative humidity and air speed) and personal variables (thermal clothing insulation and metabolic rate) along with subjective variables, according to ASHRAE Standard 55/2013, ISO / FDIS 7730: 2005 (E) and ISO 10551: 1995. It was found that both genders were dissatisfied with the temperatures at issue, males more dissatisfied than females. Regarding thermal sensation, no significant difference was seen in the two areas studied both in the spring and summer time. Variations were identified between the comfort analytical results PMV (Predicted Means Vote)/ PPD (Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfied) and the users´ actual thermal sensations, thus, the ISO / FDIS 7730: 2005 (E) and ASHRAE 55 (2013) standardized models showed no applicability for this type of environment, inserted in this climate.
159
164

REFERENCES

References: 

[1] Morimoto, T., Slabochova, Z., Naman R.K., argent 2nd F. Sex differences in physiological reactions to thermal stress. Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 22.3, 526-532, 1967.
[2] Fanger P.O. Thermal comfort: analysis and applications in environmental engineering. Copenhagen: Danish Technical Press; 1970.
[3] Schellen, L. The influence of local effects on thermal sensation under non-uniform environmental conditions-Gender differences in thermophysiology, thermal comfort and productivity during convective and radiant cooling. Physiology & Behavior, Vol. 107 (2012) 252–261, 2012.
[4] Karjalainen S. Thermal comfort and gender: a literature review. Indoor Air, Singapore, Vol. 22: 96–109, 2012;
[5] Zhai, Y., Zhang, Y., Meng, Q., Chen, H., Wang, J. Gender differences in thermal comfort in a hot-humid climate. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference Indoor Air, Hong Kong. July. 2014.
[6] Beshir, M. Y.; Ramsey J.D. Comparison between male and female subjective estimates of thermal effects and sensations. Applied Ergonomics, Vol.12.1, 29-33, 1981.
[7] Choi, J.; Aziz A.; Loftness V. Investigation on the impacts of different genders and ages on satisfaction with thermal environments in office buildings. Building and Environment, Vol. 45, 1529–1535, 2010.
[8] ISO 7730 - International Organization for Standardization. “Moderate thermal environments – Determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort”, 2005.
[9] ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55. “Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. American Society of Heating Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers” Inc. Atlanta, USA, 2013.
[10] ISO 10551 - International Organization for Standardization. “Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Assessment of the influence of the thermal environment using subjective judgment scales”. Genebra. 1995.
[11] Kottek, M., Grieser, J., Beck, C., Rudolf B., Rubel F. World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorologische Zeitschrif, Vol. 15, n.3, pp. 259–263, 2006.
[12] ISO 7726 - International Organization for Standardization. “Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Instruments for measuring physical quantities”. 1998.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com