You are here

ADVANCES IN PROMOTING LITERACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS THROUGH MOBILE LEARNING

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This article is taken from a larger review of extant research from a chapter titled “The role of mobile learning in promoting global literacy and human rights for women and girls” from the Handbook of Research on the Societal Impact of Digital Media. In this article we review the fairly recent advances in combating illiteracy around the globe through the use of mobile phones and e-readers most recently in the Worldreader program and the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) mobile phone and reading initiatives. Utilizing key human rights publications and the lens of transnational feminist discourse, which addresses globalization and the monolithic hegemonic representation of “third world” women as passive and in need of the global north’s intervention. We explore the ways in which digital media provides increased access to books, and other texts and applications in both English and native languages for people in the global south. Although the use of e-readers, mobile phones and other mobile learning initiatives are providing advances in combating illiteracy, the tensions and power imbalances of digital illiteracies as to which resources are available by whom, for whom and why, must also be examined.
1
14

REFERENCES

References: 

Apple, M., Kenway, J. Singh, M. (2005). Globalizing Education: Policies, pedagogies, & politics. New York: Peter Lang.
Armstrong, S. (2104). Uprising: A new age is dawning for every mother’s daughter. New York, NY: St. Thomas Press.
Beck, U. (2002). The cosmopolitan society and its enemies. Theory, culture & society, 19(1-2), 25-44.
Bhola, H. S. (2008). Adult literacy for sustainable development: Creating a knowledgebase discourse for action. In Signposts to literacy for sustainable development. Complementary studies by Harbans S. Bhola and Sofía Valdivielso Gómez UNESCO Institute for Lifelong earning: Hamburg, Germany.
Blackmore, J. (2005). Feminist strategic rethinking of human rights discourses in education. In W. Hesford, & W. Kozol (Eds.), Just Advocacy: Women’s human rights, transnational feminisms and the politics of representation (pp. 243-265). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Castells, M. (1996). Rise of the network society. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Dunkerly, J. & Harper, H. (2013). The girl citizen-reader: Gender and literacy education for 21st century citizenship. In B. Guzzetti & T.W. Bean (Eds.) Adolescent Literacies and the Gendered self: (Re)constructing identities through multimodal literacy practices. New York: Routledge.
Farrington, J. W., Bebbington, A., Wellard, K., & Lewis, D. L. (1993). Reluctant partners? Non-governmental organizations: The state and sustainable agriculture. London: Routledge
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York, NY: Pantheon.
Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies. London: Falmer Press.
Guzzetti, B., and Lesley, M. (Eds.) Handbook of Research on the Societal Impact of Digital Media. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Harper, H. & Dunkerly, J. (2010) Educating the world: Teachers and their work as defined by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Current Issues in Comparative Education Vol.4 pp. 56-65.
Hesford, W. S., & Kozol, W. (Eds.). (2005). Introduction. Just advocacy: Women’s human rights, transnational feminism and the politics of representation (pp. 1-29). New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press.
Hilhorst, D. (2003). The real world of NGOs: Discourses, diversity and development. London: Zed Books.
Kaestle, C. (1991). Literacy in the United States: Readers and reading since 1880. New Haven: Yale University Press.
International Women Online Journal of Distance Education
April, 2016 Volume: 5 Issue: 2 Article: 01 ISSN: 2147-0367
13
Copyright © International Women Online Journal of Distance Education / www.wojde.org
Kelleher, F. (2014, June 17). The literacy injustice: 493 million women still can’t read [magazine]. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2014...
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. and Cammack, D. A. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell and N. Unrau (eds.) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (5th edition) (pp. 1568–1611). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Luke, A. (2002). Curriculum, Ethics, Metanarrative: Teaching and Learning beyond the Nation. Curriculum Perspectives. 22(1) pp. 49-55.
Norton, B., & Williams, C. (2012). Digital identities, student investments and eGranary as placed resources. Language and Education, 26, 4, 315-329.
Peake, L., & De Souza, K. (2010). Feminist academic and activist praxis in service of the transnational. In A. Swarr, & R. Nagar (Eds.), Critical transnational feminist praxis (pp. 105-123). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Prinsloo, M., & Rowsell, J. (2012). Digital literacies and placed resources in the globalised periphery. Language and Education, 26, 4. p. 271-277.
Prinsloo, M. (2005). The new literacies as placed resources. Perspectives in Education. 23(4). 87-98.
Reena, Nagar, R., Singh, R., & Surbala (2010). Still playing with fire: Intersectionality, activism and NGOized feminism. In A. Swarr, & R. Nagar (Eds.), Critical transnational feminist praxis (pp. 124-143). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Snyder, I., & Prinsloo, M. (2007). Young peoples’ engagement with digital literacies in marginal contexts in a globalised world. Language and Education, 21, 3, 171-179.
Swarr, A. L., & Nagar, R. (Eds.). (2010). Introduction: Theorizing transnational feminist praxis. Critical transnational feminist praxis (pp. 1-20). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
The United Nations Foundation website. (n.d.). ww.unfoundation.org/faq.html
Tohidi, N. (2005, May). Transnational feminism: A range of disciplinary perspectives. In E. DuBois (Chair), Symposium conducted at the University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved from http://www.humnet.ucla.edu/humnet/cmcs/#index.html
Tomasevski, K. (2003). Education denied. London: Zed Books.
Traxler, J. (2013). mLearning: Solutions for international development - rethinking the thinking. Digital Culture & Education, 5:2, 74-85.
United Nations (1948). Resolution 217A [III] Retrieved October 20th 2015 from http://www.un-documents.net/a3r217a.htm
UNESCO. (2004). The Plurality of literacy and its Implications for Policies and Program. UNESCO Education Sector Position Paper. Retrieved October 20th, 2015 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001362/136246e.pdf
International Women Online Journal of Distance Education
April, 2016 Volume: 5 Issue: 2 Article: 01 ISSN: 2147-0367
14
Copyright © International Women Online Journal of Distance Education / www.wojde.org
UNESCO (2013). Adult and Youth Literacy [Fact sheet]: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
UNESCO/UNICEF (2007). A human rights-based approach to education: A framework for the realization of children’s right to education and rights in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. United Nations Children’s Fund. London: United Nations Children’s Fund.
Waldron, F. (2010). Introduction. In F. Waldron and B. Ruane (Eds.) Human rights education: Reflections on theory and practice. (p. 1-14). Dublin, Ireland: The Liffey Press.
West, M., & Chew, H. E. (2014). Reading in the mobile era: A study of mobile reading in developing countries [Report]. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/unesco/themes/icts/m4ed/mobile-reading/read...

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com