You are here

Home » Content

A comparative analysis of interactional metadiscourse markers in the Introduction and Conclusion sections of mechanical and electrical engineering research papers

Journal Name:

  • Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Academic writing, particularly writing research articles, is an indispensable part of every major in higher education. Hyland (2004) argued that a valuable means of exploring academic writing, and comparing the rhetorical features and preferences of different discourse communities, is through the metadiscourse analysis of the text. The present study examines the differences in the use, type, and frequency of interactional metadiscourse markers in the introduction and conclusion sections of research papers across the two disciplines of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering. To this end, 42 research articles (21 Mechanical and 21 Electrical Engineering) written by English native speakers were randomly selected from two major international journals. The current study made use of Hyland’s (2005) model for analyzing the interactional metadiscourse markers used in the selected corpus, consisting of 41484 words. To analyze the data, the frequency, patterns of use, and type of interactional metadiscourse markers were elicited both through a manual corpus analysis and concordance package. Furthermore, to examine whether there is any significant difference in the use of metadiscourse markers in the introduction and conclusion sections of these papers, a Chi-square analysis was run. The results of the quantitative analysis revealed that although there were some minor differences in the frequency and type of these metadiscourse markers, there was no statistically significant difference across the disciplines, which can be attributed to the close nature of these fields. The findings of this study may render some pedagogical implications for ESP courses and especially writing research papers.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-comparative-analysis-interactional-metadiscourse-markers-introduction-and-conclusion-sections-mechanical-and-electrical-engineering-research-papers.pdf
  • 1
37
56
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Abdi, R. (2002). Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies, 4(2), 139-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14614456020040020101
Abdi, R. (2011). Metadiscourse strategies in research articles: A study of the differences across subsections. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 3(1), 1-16.
Adel, A. (2006). Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Atai, M. R., & Sadr, L. (2008). A cross-cultural study of hedging devices in discussion section of applied linguistics research articles. Teaching English Language and Literature Society of Iran (TELLSI), 2(7), 1-2. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Barton, E. L. (1995). Contrastive and Non-contrastive Connectives Metadiscourse Functions in Argumentation. Written Communication, 12(2), 219-239.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088395012002003
Beauvais, P. J. (1989). A speech act theory of metadiscourse. Written Communication, 6(1), 11-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088389006001002
Blagojevic, S. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic prose: A contrastive study of academic articles written in English by English and Norwegian native speakers. Studies about Linguistics, 5 (1), 1-7.
Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18(S1), 41-56.
Burneikaitė, N. (2008). Metadiscourse in linguistics master theses in English L1 and L2. Kalbotrya, 59(3), 38-47.
Camiciottoli, B. C. (2003). Metadiscourse and ESP reading comprehension: An exploratory study. Reading in a Foreign Language, 15(1), 28-44.
Crismore, A. (1984). The rhetoric of textbooks: Metadiscourse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(3), 279-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0022027840160306
Crismore, A. (1989). Talking with readers: Metadiscourse as rhetorical act. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R., & Steffensen, M. S. (1993). Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, 10(1), 39-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0741088393010001002
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2003). Metadiscourse revisited: A contrastive study of persuasive writing in professional discourse. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense, 11(1), 29-57.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 3(1), (Jan., 2015) 37-56 51
Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of pragmatics, 36(10), 1807-1825.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.05.004
Enkvist, N. E. (1978). Coherence, pseudo-coherence, and non-coherence. In J. O. Östman, (Eds.), Reports on text linguistics: Semantics and cohesion (pp. 109-128). Åbo: Åbo Akademi.
Eslami, R. Z., & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2007). Discourse markers in academic lectures. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 22-38.
Fa-gen, L. (2012). Identification and functions of Metadiscourse. US-China Foreign Language, 10(1), 846-854.
Faghih, E., & Rahimpour, S. (2009). Contrastive rhetoric of English and Persian written text: Metadiscourse in applied linguistic research articles. Rice Working Papers in Linguistic, 1(1), 92-107.
Falahati, R. (2006, February). The use of hedging across different disciplines and rhetorical sections of research articles. Proceedings of the 22nd North West Linguistics Conference (NWLC22), Burnaby: Simon Fraser University, 1, 99-112.
Fuertes-Olivera, P. A., Velasco-Sacrista´n, M., Arribas-Ban˜o, A., & Samaniego-Ferna´ndez, E. (2001). Persuasion and English: Metadiscourse in slogans and headlines. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(8), 1291-1307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(01)80026-6
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (2007). Language and education. London: Continuum.
Harris, Z. (1970). Linguistic transformations for information retrieval. In papers in structural and transformational linguistics (pp. 458-471). Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Original work published 1959). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6059-1
Hellermann, J., & Vergun, A. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 157-179.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.008
Hempel, S. Degand, L. (2008). Sequencers in different text genres: Academic writing, journalese, and fiction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 676-693.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.001
Hirose, K., & Sasaki, M. (1994). Explanatory variables for Japanese students’ expository writing in English: An exploratory study. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 203-229.
Hyland, K. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239-256.
Hyland, K. (1998). Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse. Journal of pragmatics, 30(4), 437-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00009-5
52 Estaji & Vafaeimehr/A comparative analysis of …
Hyland, K., (1999). Talking to students: Metadiscourse in introductory course books. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3-26.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, K., (2001a). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20(3), 207-226.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(00)00012-0
Hyland, K. (2002). Directives: Argument and engagement in academic writing. Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 215-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.2.215
Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 133-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing (1st ed.). New York: Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 266-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm011
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
Intraprawat, P., & Steffensen, M. (1995). The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), 253-272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90012-8
Keller, E. (1979). Gambits: Conversational strategy signals. Journal of pragmatics, 3(3), 219-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(79)90032-8
Lautamatti, L. (1978). Observations on the development of the topic in simplified discourse. In V. Kohonen & N. E. Enkvist (Eds.), Text linguistics, cognitive learning, and language teaching (pp. 71-104). Turku, Finland: Finnish Association for Applied Linguistics.
Le, E. (2004). Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist’s authority. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(4), 687-714.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(03)00032-8
Mauranen, A. (1993a). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12(1), 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-4906(93)90024-I
Mauranen, A. (1993b). Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric: A Text Linguistic Study. Frankfurtam Main: Peter Lang Publisher.
Meyer，B．J．F. (1975). The organization of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co．
Moreno, A. (1997). Genres constraints across languages: Causal metatext in Spanish and English research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 16(3), 161-179.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 3(1), (Jan., 2015) 37-56 53
Mur Dueñ as, M.P. (2007). “I/we focus on…”: A cross-cultural analysis of self- mentions in business management research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(2), 143-162.
Nash, W. (1992). An uncommon tongue. London: Routledge.
Nwogu, K.N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for Specific Purposes, 16(2), 119-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(97)85388-4
Ochola, E. D. (2001). A socio-pragmatic approach to the use of meta-discourse features in effective non-native and native speaker composition writing. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of South Carolina, USA.
Perez, M. A. & Macia, E. A. (2002). Meta-discourse in lecture comprehension: Does it reallyhelp foreign language learners. Atlantis, 14(2), 3-21. Retrieved in June 2013 from
http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/41055042?uid=3739192&uid=2&uid=4&s...
1102547663597
Rashidi, N., & Alihosseini, F. (2012). A contrastive study of metadiscourse markers in research article abstracts across disciplines. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov, 5(4), 17-23.
Richards, J.C. & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). Harlow: Longman.
Schiffrin, D. (1980). Meta‐talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3/4), 199-236. Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 58-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.58
Thompson, E. S. (2003). Text-structuring metadiscourse, intonation, and the signaling of organization in academic lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(1), 5-20.
Thompson, G., & Thetela, P. (1995). The sound of one hand clapping: The management of interaction in written discourse. Text, 15(1), 103-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1995.15.1.103
Valero Garces, C. (1996). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English economics texts. Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 15(4), 279-294.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00013-0
Vande Kopple, W. J. (1985). Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, 36(1), 82-93.
54 Estaji & Vafaeimehr/A comparative analysis of …
Vande Kopple, W. J. (2002). Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric. In E. Barton & G. Stygall (Eds.), Discourse studies in composition (pp. 91-114). Gresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, Inc.
Williams, J. M. (1981). Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
Zarei, G. R. & Mansoori, S. (2011). A contrastive study on metadiscourse elements used in humanities vs. non humanities across Persian and English. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 42-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n1p42

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com