You are here

Home » Content

Using convergent and divergent tasks to improve writing and language learning motivation

Journal Name:

  • Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research

Publication Year:

  • 2015

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was an attempt to investigate the comparative impact of convergent and divergent condition tasks on EFL learners’ writing and motivation. Sixty female intermediate EFL learners were selected from among a total number of 90 through their performance on a sample piloted PET and further homogenized in terms of their writing and motivation. Based on the results, the students were randomly assigned to two experimental groups with 30 participants in each. Both groups underwent the same amount of teaching time during 18 sessions of treatment which included using divergent tasks for the first group and convergent tasks for the second. A posttest (the writing section of another sample PET) and Gardener’s Attitude and Motivation Test Battery (used also earlier for the homogenization) were administered at the end of the treatment to both groups and their mean scores on the test were compared through independent samples t-tests. The results led to the rejection of the first null hypothesis, thereby demonstrating that the learners in the convergent group benefited significantly more than those in the divergent group in terms of improving their writing. The second null hypothesis was not rejected, however, meaning that the two treatments were not significantly different in terms of improving the learners’ motivation.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-using-convergent-and-divergent-tasks-improve-writing-and-language-learning-motivation.pdf
  • 1
99
117
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Astika, G. (2004). A task-based approach to reading English for specialist purposes. EA Journal, 22(2), 22-35.
Biton, L., & Sivasubramaniam, S. (2009). An inquiry into expressive writing: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research, 13(3), 301-395.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An introductive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Pearson.
Brumfit, C. (2006). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carless, D. (2009). Revisiting the TBLT versus P-P-P Debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 19, 49-66.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cohen, A. D., & Dörnyei, Z. (2002). Focus on the language learning: Motivation, styles, and strategies. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 170-191). London: Arnold.
Cropley, A. J. (2006). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. London: Kogan Page.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and researching motivation. London: Longman.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual Differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Duff, P. (1986). Another look at interlanguage talk: Taking task to task. In R. Day (Ed.) Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 110-114). Boston, MA: Newbury House.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task performance in a second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 70-92.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. (1990). Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting. Modern Language Journal, 74, 311-326.
114 Marashi & Tahan-Shizari/Using Convergent and …
Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1999). The influence of planning and focus on planning on task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 215-247.
Gardner, R. C. (2001). Integrative motivation: Past, present and future. Temple University Japan, Tokyo, February 17, 2001. Retrieved October 10, 2012 from www.publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/GardnerPublicLecture1.pdf.
Gardner, R. C., Lalonde, R. N., Moorcroft, R., & Evers, F. T. (1987). Second language attrition: The role of motivation and use. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 6, 29-47.
Gardner, R. C., & Lysynchuk, L. M. (1990). The role of aptitude, attitudes motivation and language use on second-language acquisition and retention. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 22, 254-270.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variables in second language learning. Language Learning, 43, 157-194.
Gardner, R. C., & Tremblay, P. F. (1998). Specificity of affective variable and the trait/state conceptualization of motivation in second language acquisition. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Gardner, R. C., Tremblay, P. F., & Masgoret, A.M. (1997). Towards a full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation. Modern Language Journal, 81, 344-362.
Gredler, M. E., Brousard, S. C., & Garrison, M. E. B. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school-aged children. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 33(2), 106-120.
Hadley, A. (2003). Teaching language in context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Heasly, B. (2006). Study writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hamp-Lyons, L., & Kroll, B. (1997). TOEFL 2000 – writing: Composition, community, and assessment. (TOEFL Monograph Series Report No. 5). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29-70.
Hommel. J. (2011). The practice of English language teaching. New York: Longman Press.
Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 17-29.
Image, S. (2010). How can the use of blog software facilitate the writing process of English language learners? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(3), 183-197.
Kimura, Y. (2003). English language learning motivation: Interpreting qualitative data situated in a classroom task. Annual Review of English Language Education in Japan, 14, 71-80.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 3(1), (Jan., 2015) 99-117 115
Kimura, Y., Nakata, Y., & Okumara, T. (2001). Language learning motivation of EFL learners in Japan: A cross-sectional analysis of various learning milieus. JALT Journal, 23(1), 47-68.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Latchem, C., Latchem, C. R., & Jung, I. (2010). Distance and blended learning in Asia. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Lindgern, E., & Sullivan, K. (2003). Stimulated recall as a trigger for increasing noticing and langauge awareness in the L2 writing classroom: A case study of two young female writers. Language Awarness, 12(3), 172-186.
Long, M. (1989). Task, group, and task-group interactions. ESL, 8(1), 1-28.
Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1992). Three approaches to task-based syllabus design. TESOL Quartely, 26(1), 27-56.
MacIntyre, P. D., MacMaster, K., & Baker, S. C. (2001). The convergence of multiple models of motivation for second language learning: Gardner, Pintrich, Kuhl, and McCroskey. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 461-492). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Makumar, R. (2010). The impact of different task variance on writing proficiency. Retrieved on October 6, 2011, from: www.scripties.let.eldoc.ub.rug.nl/root/Master/ DoorstroomMasters/ToegepasteTaalwetens/2010/Makmur.
Marashi, H., & Hatam, G. (2009). Using tasks in a content-based program: Does it enhance vocabulary learning? Iranian Journal of Teaching English as a Foreign Language and Literature, 1(4), 73-91.
Marashi, H., & Dadari, L. (2012). The impact of using task-based writing on EFL learners’ writing performance and creativity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(12), 2500-2507.
Nielsen, H., Bayard, M., Pickett, C., & Simonton, D. (2008). Conceptual versus experimental creativity: Which works best on convergent and divergent thinking tasks? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(3), 131-138.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (2005). Task-based language teaching in the Asia context: Defining ‘task’. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 12-18.
Nunan, D. (2006). Designing holistic units of task-based learning. In P. Robertson & R. Nunn (Eds.), The study of second language acquisition in the Asian context (pp. 396-420). Korea: Asian EFL Journal Press.
Nunan, D., & Richards, J. (2014). Language learning beyond the classroom. London: Routledge.
116 Marashi & Tahan-Shizari/Using Convergent and …
Nunn, D. (2006). Designing holistic units of task-based learning. In P. Robertson & R. Nunn (Eds.), The study of second language acquisition in the Asian context (pp. 396-420). Korea: Asian EFL Journal Press.
Oxford R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
Oxford, R. L., & Shearin, J. (1994). Language learning motivation: Expanding the theoretical framework. Modern Language Journal, 78(1), 12-28.
Peasley, K. L., Rosaen, C. L., & Roth, K. J. (1993). The role of oral and written discourse in constructing understanding in an elementary science class. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
Plews, J. L., & Zhao, K. (2010). Tinkering with tasks knows no bounds: ESL teachers’ adaptations of task-based language-teaching. TESL Canada Journal, 28(1), 41-59.
Pourdana, N., Karimi Behbahani, M., & Safdari, M. (2011). The impact of task types on aspects of Iranian EFL learners' writing performance: Accuracy, fluency, and complexity. IPEDR, 20, 261-265.
Raimes, A. (1983). Techniques in teaching writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
Raimes, A. (2002). Ten steps in planning a writing course and training teachers of writing. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.) Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 306-314). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C., & Sandy, C. (2008). Passages. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Robinson, P. (2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. IRAL, 43(1), 1-32.
Seidlhofer, B., & Widdowson, H. (1999). Coherence in summary: The contexts of appropriate discourse. In W. Bublitz, U. Lenk, & E. Ventola (Eds.) Coherence in spoken and written discourse: How to create it and how to describe it (pp. 205-219). Amsterdam, Pa: John Benjamins.
Scheidecker, D., & Freeman, W. (1999). Bringing out the best in students: How legendary teachers motivate kids. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Shin, S. (2003). The reflective L2 writing teacher. ELT Journal, 57(1), 3-9.
Skehan, P. (2001). A framework for implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1),38-62.
Spolsky, B. (2000). Language motivation revised. Applied Linguistics, 21(2), 157-169.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 3(1), (Jan., 2015) 99-117 117
Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376-401.
Tuan, L. T. (2010). Enhancing EFL learners’ writing skill via journal writing. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 80-81.
Van den Branden, K. (2006). Task-based language education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness, and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 70-89.
Vohs, K., Baumeister, B., Jean, M., Twenge, J., Nelson, N., & Tice, D. (2008). Making choices impairs subsequent self-control: A limited resource account of decision making, self-Regulation, and active initiative. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 883- 898.
Watkins, D., McInerney, D. M., Lee, C., Akande, A., & Regmi, M. (2002). Motivation and learning strategies. A cross-cultural perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning, Vol. 2 (pp. 329-343). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible sociocultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction, 9, 493-516.
Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
White, R., & Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Widdowson, H. G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. London: Longman.
Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com