Are scientists objective? An investigation of appraisal resources in English popular science articles
|Author Name||University of Author|
Abdollahzade, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43 (1), 288-297.
Babaii, E. (2011). Hard science, hard talk? The study of negative comments in physics book reviews. In F. Salager-Mayer, & B.A. Lewin (Eds.). Crossed Words, Criticism in Scholarly Writing (pp. 55-77). Switzerland: Peter Lang.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 5(1), (Jan., 2017) 1-19 15
Ben-Ari, E. T. (1999). When scientists write books for the public: The ups and downs, ins and outs, of writing popular science books. BioScience, 49 (10), 819-824.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bowler, P. J. (2009). Science for All: The Popularization of Science in Early Twentieth-Century Britain. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago and London.
Bozorgian, H., & Fallahpour, S. (2015). Teachers’ and students’ amount and purposes of L2 use: English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom in Iran. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3 (2), 67-81.
Bucchi, M. (2013). Style in science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 22 (8), 904-915.
Coffin, C. (1997). Constructing and giving value to the past: An investigation into secondary school history. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the work place and school (pp. 196-230). London: Continuum.
Dafouz-Milner, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: Across-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40 (1), 95-113.
Estrada, F. C. R., & David, L. S. (2015). Improving visual communication of science through incorporation of graphic design theories and practices into science communication. Science Communication, 37 (1), 140-148.
Fahnestock, J. (1998). Accommodating science: The rhetorical life of scientific facts. Written Communication, 15 (3), 330-350.
Gallardo, S. (2005). Pragmatic support of medical recommendations in popularized texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 37 (6), 813-835.
Giannoni, D. S. (2008). Popularizing features in English journal editorials. English for Specific Purposes, 27 (2), 212-232.
Hood, S. (2004). Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing (Doctoral thesis, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia). Retrieved November 4, 2013 from http://grammatics.com/appraisal/hoodS-phd-links.htm
Hunston, S., & Thompson, G. (2000). Education in text: authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9 (2), 116-127.
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24 (2), 123-139.
16 E. Babaii, M. Atai & M. Saidi/Are Scientists Objective? …
Lee, S. H. (2006). The use of interpersonal resources in argumentative/persuasive essays by East-Asian ESL and Australian tertiary students. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.
Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Communication and the social representation of scientific knowledge. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 7 (1), 1-10.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. P. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Ney York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miller, J. D. (2004). Public understanding of, and attitudes toward scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Understanding of Science, 13 (3), 273-294.
Miller, Th. (1998). Visual persuasion: A comparison of visuals in academic texts and the popular press. English for Specific Purposes, 17 (1), 29-46.
Nur Aktas, R., & Cortes, V. (2008). Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 (1), 3-14.
Nwogu, K. N. (1991). Structure of science popularizations: A genre-analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts. English for Specific Purposes, 10 (2), 111-123.
Page, R. E. (2003). An analysis of appraisal in childbirth narratives with special consideration of gender and storytelling style. Text, 23 (2), 211-237.
Parkinson, J., & Adendorff, R. (2004). The use of popular science articles in teaching scientific literacy. English for Specific Purposes, 23 (4), 379-396.
Rashidi, N., Rahimi, M., & Alimorad, Z. (2014). Iranian university English learners’ discursive demotivation construction. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2(2), 35-49.
Ren, F., & Zhai, J. (2014). Communication and Popularization of Science and Technology in China. London: Springer.
Riesch, H. (2014). Why did the proton cross the road? Humor and Science Communication, Public Understanding of Science, 24 (7), 768-775.
Russell, N. (2010). Communicating Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sapp, G. (1995). Building a Popular Science Library Collection for High School to Adult Learners: Issues and Recommended Resources. USA: Greenwood Press.
Shaw, Ph., & Vassileva, I. (2009). Co-evolving academic rhetoric across culture: Britain, Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany in the 20th century. Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (2), 290-305.
Turney, J. (1996). Public understanding of science. THE LANCET, 347 (9008), 1087-1090.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 5(1), (Jan., 2017) 1-19 17
Tutin, A. (2010). Evaluative adjectives in academic writing in the humanities and social sciences. In R. Lores-Sanz, P. Mur-Duenas, & E. Laufauente-Millan (eds.) Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres (pp. 219-240).. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Varttala, T. (1999). Remarks on the communicative function of hedging in popular science and specialist research articles of Medicine. English for Specific Purposes, 18 (2), 177-200.
White, P. R. R. (1998). Telling Media Tales: the news story as rhetoric. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. University of Sydney, Sydney.
Zhang, J. Y. (2015). The ‘credibility paradox’ in China’s science communication: views from scientific practitioners. Public Understanding of Science, 24 (8), 913-927.