You are here

The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused designs

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in the improvement of language learners' grammatical accuracy has been a topic of interest in SLA studies for the past couple of decades. The present study reports the findings of a three-month study investigating the effect of direct unfocused WCF on the grammatical accuracy of elementary students in an EFL context. The researchers selected two intact classes totaling 33 students, and assigned each to a direct feedback group (n = 16) and a control group (n = 17). The students produced eight pieces of writing (a pretest, three writing tasks along with their revisions, and a posttest) from which their grammatical accuracy was obtained. The results indicated that while the experimental group significantly outperformed the control group in the revision of the three writing tasks, no significant difference was found when the two groups produced a new piece of writing after a one-month interval. The study concludes that accuracy improvement caused by unfocused WCF during the revision process does not extend to EFL learners' future writing when no feedback is available, at least at the elementary level.

REFERENCES

References: 

Amrhein H.R., & Nassaji H. (2010) Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95-127.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 4(2), (July, 2016) 55-68 65
Ashwell, T. (2000). Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: Is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(3), 227-257.
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102-118.
Bitchener, J. (2009). Measuring the effectiveness of written corrective feedback: A response to ‘‘Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Bitchener (2008)’’. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(4), 276-279.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008a). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research Journal, 12, 409-431.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008b). The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(3), 204-211.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2009). The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37, 322-329.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010a). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193-214.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010b). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 207-217.
Bruton, A. (2009). Designing research into the effect of error correction in L2 writing: not so straightforward. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 136-140.
Bruton, A. (2010). Another reply to Truscott on error correction: improved situated designs over statistics. System, 38, 491-498.
Byram, M. (2013). Language teaching and its contexts. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 1-26.
Chandler, J. (2000). The efficacy of error correction for improvement in the accuracy of L2 student writing. Paper presented at the AAAL conference, Vancouver, B. C.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.
Chandler, J. (2004). A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 345-348.
Chandler, J. (2009). Response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 57-58.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107.
66 M. Khanlarzadeh & M. Nemati/The effect of written …
Ellis, R. (2013). Corrective feedback in teacher guides and SLA. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 1-18.
Ellis, R., Sheen, Y., Murakami, M., & Takashima, H. (2008). The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context. System, 36, 353-371.
Fathman, A. K., & Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: Focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom (pp. 178-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fazio, L. (2001). The effect of corrections and commentaries on the journal writing accuracy of minority- and majority-language students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 235-249.
Ferris, D. R. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-339.
Ferris, D. R. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: a response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 1-11.
Ferris, D.R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49-62.
Ferris, D. R. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181-201.
Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of error in second language student writing (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
Ferris, D. R., & Helt, M. (2000). Was Truscott right? New evidence on the effects of error correction in L2 writing classes. Paper presented at the American Association of Applied Linguistics Conference, March 11-14, 2000, Vancouver, B. C.
Jacobs, H. L., Zinkgraf, S. A., Wormuth, D. R., Hartfiel, V. F. & Hughey, J. B. (1981). Testing ESL composition: a practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second language writing skills. Modern Language Journal, 75, 305-313.
Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 4(2), (July, 2016) 55-68 67
Lee, I. (2003). L2 writing teachers' perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing, 8, 216-237.
Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285-312.
Nassaji H., & Fotos, S. (2004). Current developments in research on the teaching of grammar. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 126-145.
Nemati, M., & Azizi, M. (2013). Grading, no longer an obstacle to learners’ attendance to teacher feedback. Applied Research on English Language, 2(2), 129-143.
Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). ‘If only I had more time’: ESL learners’ changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 43-68.
Radecki, P. M., & Swales, J.M. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 16, 355-365.
Semke, H. (1984). The effects of the red pen, Foreign Language Annals, 17, 195-202.
Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly 41, 255-283.
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A. (2009). Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37, 556-569.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327-369.
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for ‘‘the case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes’’: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111-122.
Truscott, J. (2004). Dialogue: Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 337-343.
Truscott, J. (2007). Grammar teaching and the evidence: A response to Nassaji and Fotos (2004). International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(1), 10-22.
Truscott, J. (2009). Arguments and appearances: a response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 59-60.
Truscott, J. (2010a). Some thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate. System, 38, 329-335.
Truscott, J. (2010b). Further thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate. System, 38, 626-633.
68 M. Khanlarzadeh & M. Nemati/The effect of written …
Truscott, J., & Hsu, A.Y. (2008). Error correction, revision, and learning. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 292-305.
Xu, C. (2009). Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Ellis et al. (2008) and Bitchener (2008). Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 270-275.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com