You are here

Home » Content

FAZLA KİLOLU VE ŞİŞMAN KADINLARDA FEMUR PARAMETRELERİNİN VÜCUT YAĞ MİKTARI İLE İLİŞKİSİ

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2003

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The reliabilily ofîhîgh anthropomefıy as a predictor of body fat in obese women. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationships betvveen thigh anfhropometric parameters (femur skinfold thickness, midthigh circumferencc, total thigh area, thigh muscle and bone area and thigh subcutaneous adipose tissue) and body fat mass determined by bioeleclric impedance (BIA), BMI and weight in overweight and obese (body mass index, BMI >25 kg/m2) women. Study group is consisted of 115 subjecis. There werc signifİcant positive correlalions between Ihiglı fat mass and weight (r:.5831), BMI (r.5585), fat mass determined by bioelectric impedance analysis (BIA) (r:.5073) ( p value is 0.000 for ali). The measurement of thigh parameters are likely to prove useful in clİnical evalualion and field studİes of body fat mass in obese women.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Femur parametrelerinin vücut yağ miktarını belirlemedeki değerini incelemek amacıyla 115 fazla kilolu ve şişman kadında femur parametreleri ile biyoelektrik impedans analizi (BIA) bulguları arasındaki ilişki araştırıldı. Fazla kilolııluk kriteri olarak beden kitle indeksinin (body mass index, BMI) 25 kg/m2'nİn üzerinde bulunması kabul edildi. Femur deri kıvrım kalınlığı, femur ortası çap, total femur alanı, femur yağsız doku alanı ve femur yağ alam ile BIA parametreleri (yüzde yağ oranı, mutlak yağ miktarı, yüzde yağsız kitle oram ve mutlak yağsız kitle miktarı), BMI ve ağırlık arasında anlamlı ilişkiler bulundu. En anlamlı ilişkileri femur yağ alanı gösterdi (ağırlık ile r= .5831, BMI ile i- .5585, mutlak yağ miktarı Üc r= .5073, hepsi için p= .000). Bulgularımız femur parametrelerinin fazla kilolu ve şişman kadınlarda vücut yağ miktarı hakkında fikir verebileceğini desteklemektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-fazla-kilolu-sisman-kadinlarda-femur-parametrelerinin-vucut-yag-miktari-ile-iliskisi.pdf
  • 4
234-237
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Armitage P, Bcrry G: Slatislical Melhods in Medical Research, Blackvvetl, Oxford, 2.Baskı, (1987).
2. Baumgarlner RN, Chumlea WC, Roche AF: Bioelectric impedance phase angle and body composition. Am J Ciin Nutr48: 16(1988).
3. Bray GA: Clasİfication and evaluaiion of the obesities. Med CİinNorth Am 73:
4. Despres JP, Prudhommc D, Pouliot MC, Tremblay A, Bouchard C: Estitnation of dcep abdominal adipo.se tis-suc accumulation from simple anlhropometric measure-ments in men. Am J Clitı Nutr 54:471 (1991).
5. Deıırenberg P, Wcstslrate JA, Hautvast JGAJ: Changcs in fal-free mass during vveight loss measured by bioelecl-rical impedance and by densitometry. Am J Clin Nulr 49: 33(1989).
6. Goodpasler BH, Thaete FL, KellcyDE: Thigh adipose tissuc distribution is associated with insülin resistance in obesity and in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 71: 885 (2000).
7. Goodpaster BH, Thaete FL, Simoneau JA, KellcyDE: Subcutaneous abdominal fat and thigh muscle composİü-on predict insülin sensitivily independently of visccral fat. Diabetes 46: 1579(1997).
8. Grimby G, Kvist H, Grangard U: Reduction in thigh muscle cross-sccüonal area and strength in a 4-ycar fol-(ow-up in latc polio. Ardı Phys Med Rehabil 77: 1044-1048,(1996).
9. Han TS, Lean MEJ: Anlhropometric indices of obesily and regional distribution of fat depots. International Texlbook of Obesity, Ed: Björnloıp P, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, Chichester,(2001), p: 51-65.
10. Heynısfıeld SB, Allison DB, Wang ZM, Baumgaıtner RN, Ross R: Evaluaiion of toial and regional body com-posilion. Handbook of Obesity, Ed: Bray GA, Bouchard C, James WPT, Marcel Dekker Inc, Ncw York (1998), s:4L77.
11. Housh DJ, Housh TJ, Weir JP, Wcir LL, Johnson GO, Stout JR: Anthropometric estimation of thigh muscle cross-sectional area. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27: 784 (1995).
12. Howe TE, Oldham JA: The reiiability of measuring qu-adriceps cross-sectional area with compound B ultraso-und scanning. Physiorther Res Int 1: 112 (1996).
13. Kahn HS, Narayan KMV, Williamson DF, Valdez R: Relation of bİrth weight to lean and fat thigh tissue İn yo-ung men. Int J Obes 24: 667 (2000).
14. Kaizu Y, Ohkawa S, Kumagai H: Muscle mass index in hacmodialysis paüenls. A comparison of indices oblai-ned by routine clinical examinations. NephTOİ Dial Transplant 17: 442 (2002).
15. Kanehisa H, Ikegawa S, Ftıkunaga T: Body composiiion and cross-secfional areas of limb lean tissues İn Olympic vveight lîfters. Scand JMed Sci Sports 8: 271 (1998).
16. Kanehisa H, Ikegavva S, Fukunaga T: Comparison of muscle cross-sectional areas betvveen vveight lifters and mestlere. Int J Sports Med 19: 265 (1998).
17. Knapik JJ, Staab JS, Harman EA: Validily of an antropo-metric estimate of thigh muscle cross-sectional area. Med Sci Sports Exerc 28: 1523 (1996).
18. Kushner RF, Schoeller DA: Estimation of total body vva-ter by bioeleetrieal impedance analysis. Anı J Clin Nutr 44:417(1986).
19. Lee RC, Wang ZM, Heo M. Ross R, Janssen I, Heyssfi-eld SB: Total body skeletal muscle mass. Development and eross validation of anthropomelric predietion mo-dels. Am J Clin Nutr 72: 796 (2000).
20. Levine JA, Abboud L, Barry M, Reed JE, Shecdy PF, Jensen MD: Measuring leg muscle and fat mass in hu-mans. Comparison of CT and dııal energy X-ray absorp-tiometry. J Appl Physiol 88: 452 (2000).
21. Lukaski HC: Methods for thc assessment of human body composition. Traditional and new. Anı J Clin Nutr 46: 537(1987).
22. Matthevvs DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turncr RC: Homeostasis model assessment: insülin resistance and beta-cell funetion from fas-ting plasma giucose and insülin concentrations in man. Diabetologia28: 12(1985).
23. Mueller WH, Marbella A, Harrist RB, Kaplovvitz HJ, Grunbaum JA, Labarthe DR: Body circumferences as al-temative £o skinfold measures of body fal distribution in children. Asın Hum Biol 16: 495 (1989).
24. Nİc NH, Hull CM, Jenkins JG, Steinbrcnnar K, Benla DM: Statistical Package of the Social Sciences, McGravv HiII, Nevv York, 2.Baskı, (1975).
25. Norusis MJ: SPSS/PC+ for Üıe IBM PC/XT/AT. SPSS Inc, Chicago, (1986).
26. Ryan AS, Nicklas BJ, Berman DM, Dennis KE: Dietary reslriction and vvalking reduce fat deposİtion in thc midt-high in obese older vvomen. Anı J Ciin Nutr 72: 708 (2000).
27. Wang ZM, Hcshka S, Pierson RN Jr, Heymsfield SB: Systcmatic organtzialion of body composition methodo-logy overvievv vvith empbasis on component based methods. Am J Clin Nutr 61:457 (î 995).
28. Wang ZM, Pierson RN, Heymsfield SB: The five levcl model. A nevv approach to organizing body composition researeh. Am J Ciin Nutr 54: 970 (1991).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com