You are here

KRONİK BÖBREK YETERSİZLİĞİNDE RENAL REPLASMAN TEDAVİLERİNİN (DİYALİZ VE TRANSPLANTASYON) ÜREMİK POLİNÖROPATİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİNiN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

THE COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPIES (DIALYSIS AND TRANSPLANTATION) ON UREMIC POLYNEUROPATHY IN CHRONIC RENAL FAILURE

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of dialysis (dx) and transplantation (tx) on uremic polyneuropathy. Material and methods: Eleven dx and 22 tx recipients were included in this study. Also, there were ten healthy persons in the control group. Electrophysiologic studies were recorded before and after six months from the onset of dx and tx. Sensory parameters (distal latency, peak latency, amplitude, conduction velocity, and sural/radial amplitude ratio) were measured in median, ulnar, radial, sural and superficial peroneal nerves. Motor parameters (distal latency, amplitude, and conduction velocity) were recorded in the median, ulnar, common peroneal and tibial nerves. Additionaly, median and tibial F wave latency and tibial H latency were measured. Results: While sensory distal latencies and peak latencies (ms) did not change significantly in dx patients (2.05→2.0, p>0.5 and 2.61→2.59, p>0.5, in ulnar nerve, respectively; 2.95→2.96, p>0.5 ve 3.75→3.81, p>0.5, in sural nerve, respectively), there was a significant decrease in tx patients (1.83→1.73, p<0.5 and 2.47→2.35, p<0.5, in ulnar nerve, respectively; 2.83→2.68, p<0.5 and 3.65→3.46, p<0.5, in sural nerve, respectively). Sensory amplitudes (μV) and conduction velocities (m/sn) increased significantly in ulnar nerve for dx and tx patients (13.98→16.97, p<0.01 and 48.67→51.76, p<0.01, respectively, in dx patients; 13.4→23.11, p<0.001 and 53.15→57.31, p<0.001, respectively, in tx patients), but these parameters for sural nerve increased in only tx patients (10.91→11.08, p>0.5 and 45.39→46.14, p>0.5, respectively, in dx patients; 17.36→21.28, p<0.001 and 49.01→51.96, p<0,01, respectively, in tx patients). As motor distal latencies, amplitudes and conduction velocities did not change in ulnar nerve for dx patients (2.76→2.61, p>0.05, 9.15→9.60, p>0.5, 55.99→56.27, p>0.5, respectively), these parameters changed significantly in tx patients (2.45→2.05, p<0.5, 9.35→10.90, p<0.5, 61.77→64.18, p<0.01, respectively). Significant changes were found for same parameters in tibial nerve in dx and tx patients (15.15→9.16, p<0.001, 4.12→4.96, p<0.5, 40.18→42.49, p<0.5, respectively, in dx patients; 13.61→8.30, p<0.001, 5.86→6.87, p<0.5, 43.83→45.43, p<0.5, respectively, in tx patients). Median and tibial F wave responses and tibial H reflex latencies changed significantly in each group. But, increment of tibial H reflex amplitudes were found in only tx patients. While sural/radial sensory amplitude ratio decreased (0.56→0.49) in dx patients, this ratio increased (0.62→0.68) in tx patients. Conclusion: The results of this study indicated that sensory parameters showed considerable improvement than motor parameters in both of the dx and tx patients. The improvements in sensory and motor parameters and F wave and H reflex latency were more prominent in tx recipients. In contrast to related literature, almost all of the parameters were found to have improved in tx patients despite their long pretransplant uremic period. These results suggest that renal tx is more effective than dx regarding uremic polyneuropathy outcomes.
Abstract (Original Language): 
ÖZET Amaç: Bu çal›flman›n amac› kronik renal yetersizli¤i olan hastalarda diyaliz (dx) ve transplantasyonun (tx) üremik polinöropatiye etkinliklerinin karfl›laflt›r›lmas›d›r. Gereç ve yöntem: Çal›flmam›za 11 diyaliz (9’u hemodiyaliz, 2’si kronik periton diyalizli) ve 22 renal transplantl› olmak üzere toplam 33 hasta al›nd›. Kontrol grubunda 10 sa¤l›kl› birey vard›. Renal replasman tedavisi yani dx veya tx yap›lmadan önce ve tedavinin bafllamas›ndan 6 ay sonra elektrofizyolojik incelemeler yap›ld›. Duysal iletiler olarak medyan, ulnar, radyal, sural ve superfisyel peroneal sinirlerde bafllang›ç (distal) latans›, tepe latans›, amplitüd, ileti h›z› ve sural/radyal duysal cevap amplitüd oran›; motor iletiler olarak ise medyan, ulnar, peroneal ve tibial sinirlerde, distal latans, amplitüd ve ileti h›z› hesapland›. Ayr›ca medyan ve tibial F dalga ile tibial H refleks latanslar› da incelendi. Bulgular: Duysal cevap bafllang›ç (distal) latanslar› ve tepe latanslar›nda (ms) dx hastalar›nda anlaml› bir de¤ifliklik olmazken (örne¤in, ulnar sinirde s›ras›yla 2,05→2,0, p>0,5 ve 2,61→2,59, p>0,5; sural sinirde s›ras›yla 2,95→2,96, p>0,5 ve 3,75→3,81, p>0,5), tx hastalar›nda anlaml› azalma saptand› (örne¤in, ulnar sinirde s›ras›yla 1,83→1,73, p<0,5 ve 2,47→2,35, p<0,5; sural sinirde s›ras›yla 2,83→2,68, p<0,5 ve 3,65→3,46, p<0,5). Duysal cevap amplitüdleri (μV) ve ileti h›zlar›nda (m/sn) da ulnar sinirde dx ve tx hastalar›nda anlaml› art›fl olurken (dx hastalar›nda s›ras›yla 13,98→16,97, p<0,01 ve 48,67→51,76, p<0,01; tx hastalar›nda s›ras›yla 13,4→23,11, p<0,001 ve 53,15→57,31, p<0,001) sural sinirde sadece tx hastalar›nda anlaml› art›fl bulundu (dx hastalar›nda s›- ras›yla 10,91→11,08, p>0,5 ve 45,39→46,14, p>0,5; tx hastalar›nda s›ras›yla 17,36→21,28, p<0,001 ve 49,01→51,96, p<0,01). Ulnar sinirdeki motor cevap bafllang›ç (distal) latanslar›, amplitüdleri ve ileti h›zlar› diyaliz hastalar›nda de¤iflmezken (s›ras›yla 2,76→2,61, p>0,5, 9,15→9,60, p>0,5, 55,99→56,27, p>0,5), tx hastalar›nda anlaml› olarak de¤iflmifltir (s›ras›yla 2,45→2,05, p<0,5, 9,35→10,90, p<0,5, 61,77→64,18, p<0,01). Ayn› de¤erlerin tibial sinirdeki ölçümlerinde dx ve tx grubunda anlaml› de¤ifliklikler bulunmufltur (dx grubunda s›ras›yla 15,15→9,16, p<0,001, 4,12→4,96, p<0,5, 40,18→42,49, p<0,5 ve tx grubunda s›ras›yla 13,61→8,30, p<0,001, 5,86→6,87, p<0,5, 43,83→45,43, p<0,5). Her iki grup hastada da medyan ve tibial F dalga yan›tlar› ile tibial H refleks latanslar›nda anlaml› de¤ifliklikler olmufltur. Tibial H refleks amplitüdleri ise sadece tx grubunda anlaml› art›fl göstermifltir. Sural/radyal duysal amplitüd oran›nda ise dx grubunda azalma olurken (0,56→0,49) tx grubunda art› fl (0,62→0,68) gözlendi. Sonuç: Hem diyaliz ve hem de tx hastalar›nda duysal parametrelerin motor parametrelerden daha belirgin olarak düzeldi¤i; duysal, motor iletilerde ve F dalga yan›t› ile H refleksindeki düzelmenin transplantl› hastalarda daha belirgin oldu¤u dikkati çekmifltir. Literatürde belirtildi¤inin aksine, transplantl› hastalar›m›zda preop üremik dönemin uzunlu¤una ra¤men posttx tüm iletilerde anlaml› düzelmeler dikkati çekmifltir. Bu sonuçlar üremik polinöropatinin tedavisinde renal tx’in diyaliz tedavisine üstünlü¤ünü göstermifltir.
75-79

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Bazzi C, Pagani C, Sorgato G, Albonico G, Fellin G, D'Amico
G. Uremic polyneuropathy: a clinical and electrophysiological
study in 135 short- and long-term hemodialyzed patients. Clin
Nephrol 1991; 35:176-181.
2. Bolton CF, Baltzan MA, Baltzan RB. Effects of renal transplantation
on uremic neuropathy. N Engl J Med 1971; 284:1170-
1175.
3. De Weerd AW, Nihom J, Rozeman CA, Poortvliet DC, Jonkman
EJ, Van der Maas AP, Tjandra YI. H reflexes as a measure for
uremic polyneuropathy. A longitudinal study in patients treated
with dialysis or renal transplantation. Electroencephalogr Clin
Neurophysiol 1994; 93:276-280.
4. el Aklouk I, Basic Kes V, Basic-Jukic N, Brunetta B, Kes P. Uremic
polyneuropathy. Acta Med Croatica 2004; 58:59-61.
5. Hilz MJ, Claus D, Rosl G, Hofmann E, Braun J, Neundorfer B.
Improvement of temperature and vibration sense in chronic uremia
after a single dialysis. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 1995;
63:264-269.
6. Hupperts RM, Leunissen KM, van Hooff JP, Lodder J. Recovery
of uremic neuropathy after renal transplantation. Clin Neurol
Neurosurg 1990; 92:87-89.
7. Laaksonen S, Metsarinne K, Voipio-Pulkki LM, Falck B. Neurophysiologic
parameters and symptoms in chronic renal failure.
Muscle Nerve 2002; 25:884-890.
8. Malberti F, Surian M, Farina M, Vitelli E, Mandolfo S, Guri L,
De Petri GC, Castellani A. Effect of hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration
on uremic neuropathy. Blood Purif 1991; 9:285-295.
9. Mansouri B, Adybeig B, Rayegani M, Yasami S, Behshad V.
Uremic neuropathy and the analysis of electrophysiological
changes. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 41:107-115.
10. Nielsen VK. The peripheral nerve function in chronic renal failure.
VIII. Recovery after renal transplantation. Clinical aspects.
Acta Med Scand 1974;195:163-170.
11. Nielsen VK. The peripheral nerve function in chronic renal failure.
VII. Decreament nerve conduction in uremia? Acta Med
Scan 1974;195:155-162.
12. Pirzada NA, Morgenlander JC. Peripheral neuropathy in patients
with chronic renal failure. A treatable source of discomfort and
disability. Postgrad Med 1997; 102:249-50, 255-57, 261.
13. Rutkove SB, Kothari MJ, Raynor EM, Levy ML, Fadic R, Nardin
RA. Sural/radial amplitude ratio in the diagnosis of mild axonal
polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1997; 20:1236-1241.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com