You are here

BİR BAZ İSTASYONU YAKININDA YAŞAYANLARDA ELEKTROMANYETİK HİPERSENSİTİVİTE SEMPTOMLARI

THE ELECTROMAGNETIC HYPERSENSITIVITY SYMPTOMPS OF PEOPLE LIVING NEAR A BASE STATION

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: The aim of study is to determine electromagnetic hypersensitivity symptoms (EHS) of people living 300 meter nearby a base station. Materials and methods: In this descriptive study, 195 persons living in 182 houses within 300 meters distants from a base station at Keçiören district are included. The variables of this study are sociodemographic characteristics, time spent at home, EHS symptoms (neurological, dermatological, endocrinological, metabolic and other symptoms) probable EMF resources and health status. EHS is described as “is a condition in which a person reports physical and/or psychological symptoms which appear to be aggrevated by electric or magnetic fields or other electromagnetic waves at exposure levels tolerated by the general public.” Results: Of the participants 46.2% are between 25-44 age group. 67.2% are female, 70.8% state that have a headache, 64.1% are nervous, 53.8% have sleep disorders. The frequency of EHS symptoms varies between 7.6%- 70.8%. Five participants stated that their the reason of health problems are working with computers, cellular phones, base stations and television. EHS frequency is determined as 2.6. Conclusion: EHS symptoms are multifactorial. Therefore it is difficult to associate symptoms with EMF. It is necessary to carry studies on raising awareness of people and especially inform to community to prevent EHS.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çal›flmada, bir baz istasyonunun 300 metre yak›n›nda bulunan evlerde yaflayanların; elektromanyetik hipersensitivite (EMH) semptomlarını de¤erlendirmek amaçlanm›flt›r. Gereç ve yöntem: Tan›mlay›c› olan bu araflt›rma, Keçiören ilçesi, Afla¤› E¤lence Mahallesinde bulunan bir baz istasyonunun 300 metre yak›n›ndaki 182 hanede yaflayan 18 yafl ve üzeri 195 kiflide yap›lm›flt›r. Kiflilerin sosyodemografik özellikleri, evde geçirilen süre, sinir sistemi, cilt, hormonal ve metabolik ve di¤er EMH semptomlar›, olas› Elektromanyetik alan (EMA) kaynaklar› ve genel sa¤l›k durumu araflt›rman›n de¤iflkenlerini oluflturmaktad›r. EMH, “bireylerin “elektromanyetik alana” maruz kalmaya ba¤lad›klar› birçok nonspesifik semptomlar” olarak tan› mlanm›flt›r. Bulgular: Araflt›rmaya kat›lan 195 kiflinin %46,2’si 25-44 yafl grubunda yer almaktad›r. Kat›l›mc›lar›n %67,2’si kad› nd›r. Kat›l›mc›lar›n %70,8’i bafl›n›n a¤r›d›¤›n›, %64,1’i gergin ve sinirli oldu¤unu, %53,8’i ise uyku sorunu yaflad›¤› n› ifade etmifltir. EMH semptomlar›n›n s›kl›¤› %7,6-%70,8 aras›nda de¤iflmektedir. Araflt›rmada kat›l›mc›n›n befli mevcut sa¤l›k flikayetlerinin, bilgisayar, cep telefonu, baz istasyonu ve televizyondan kaynakland›¤›n› ifade etmifltir. EMH s›kl›¤› 2,6 olarak saptanm›flt›r. Sonuç: EMH ile iliflkili semptomlar›n oluflmas›nda birçok de¤iflken rol oynamaktad›r. Bu nedenle semptomlar›n EMA ile iliflkilendirilmesi güç olmaktad›r. Kiflilerin fark›ndal›¤›n› artt›rmaya yönelik çal›flmalar yap›lmas›, EMH’nin önlenmesi için öncelikle halka konu ile ilgili bilgi verilmesi gerekmektedir.
77-83

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Abdel-Rassoul G, Abou El-Fateh O, Salem MA, Michael A, Farahat
F, El-Batanouny M, Salem E, Neurobehavioral effect
among inhabitants around mobile phone base stations. NeuroToxicology
2007; 28:434-440.
2. Ahlbom A, Cardis E, Green A, Linet M, Savitz D, Swerdlow A,
A. Review of the epidemiologic literature on EMF and Health.
Environmental Health Perspectives 2001; 109:911-933.
3. Coggon D. Health risks from mobile phone base stations. Occup.
Environ. Med. 2006; 63:298-299.
4. Curcio G, Ferrara M, Moroni F, D’Inzeo G, Bertini M, De Gennaro
L, Is the brain influenced by a phone call? An EEG study
of resting wakefulness. Neuroscience Research 2005; 53:265-
270.
5. Eltiti S, Wallace D, Ridgewell A, Zougkou K, Russo R, Sepul-
Elektromanyetik hipersensitivite semptomlar›
‹stanbul T›p Fakültesi Dergisi Cilt / Volume: 72 • Say› / Number: 3 • Y›l/Year: 2009
- 82 -
veda F, Mirshekar-Syahkal D, Rasor P, Deeble R, Fox E, Does
Short-Term Exposure To Mobile Phone Base Station Signals
Increase Symptoms In Individuals Who Report Sensitivity To
Electromagnetic Fields? ADouble-Blind Randomized Provocation
Study. Environmental Health Perspectives. 2007; 115:1603.
6. Frank AL. Nonionising radiation, in Robert B, Wallace, Wallace/
Maxcy-Rosenau-Last, Public Health ad Preventive Medicine,
McGraw Hill Medical, 15. Ed. New York; 2008. p.743-754.
7. Frick U, Rehm J, Eichammer P, Risk perception, somatization,
and self report of complaints related to electromagnetic fields –
a randomized survey study. Int J Hyg Environ Health 2002;
205:353-360.
8. Gobba F. Hypersensitivity syndrome. G Ital Med Lav Ergon.
2003; 25(3):371-2.
9. Güler Ç, Çevre Sa¤l›¤›, Edt: Güler Ç, Ak›n L, Halk Sa¤l›¤› Temel
Bilgiler Kitab›, Ankara, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yay›n›,
2006, 507-595.
10. Health and Electromagnetic Fields. EU-funded research into the
impact of electromagnetic fields and mobile telephones on health.
What are electromagnetic fields? European commission.
Community research. 2008;1-7.
11. Hillert L, Berglind N, Arnetz B. Prevalence of self reported
hypersensitivity to electic or magnetic fields in a population based
questionnaire survey. Scand J Work Environ Health
2002;28:33-41.
12. Hillert L, Hedman BK, Söderman E, Arnetz BB, Hypersensitivity
to electricity: working definition and additional characterization
of the syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Research
1999; 47:429-438.
13. Hillert L, Kolmodin-Hedman B. Hypersensitivity to electricity:
sense or sensibility? J Psychosom Res 1997; 42:427-432.
14. Hutter HP, Moshammer H, Wallner P, Kundi M, Subjective syptoms,
sleep problems, and cognitive performance in subject living
near mobile phone base station. Occup. Environ Med 2006;
63:307-313.
15. Hyams K. Developing case definitions for symptom-based canditions:
the problem of specificity. Epidemiol Rev 1998; 20:
148-56.
16. Johansson O. Electrohypersensitivity: state-of-the-art of a functional
impairment. Electromagn Biol Med. 2006; 25:245-58.
17. Mortazavi SM, Ahmadi J, Shariati M. Prevalence of subjective
poor health symptoms associated with exposure to electromagnetic
fields among university students. Bioelectromagnetics.
2007; 28:326-30.
18. Ocaktan ME, Akdur R. Cep Telefonu Teknolojisi ve Sa¤l›k. Turkiye
Klinikleri J Med Sci 2008; 28: 58-65.
19. Otto M, Mühlendahl KE. Electromagnetic fields (EMF): Do
they play a role in children’s environmental health (CEH)?. Int.
J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2007; 210:635-644.
20. Paneth N. Neurobehavioral Effects of Power-Frequency Electromagnetic
Fields. Environmental Health Perspectives Supplements
1993; 101:4.
21. Rea WJ, Pan Y, Yenyves EJ, Sujisawa I, Samadi N, Ross GH,
Electromagnetic Field Sensitivity. Journal of Bioelectricity
1991; 10: 241-256.
22. Rööslia M, Moserc M, Baldininia Y, Merierc M, Symptom of ill
health ascribe to electromagnetic field exposure- A Questionnarie
survey. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2004; 207:141-150.
23. Rubin G J, Hahn G, Everitt B S, Cleare A J, Wessely S, Are some
people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants
double blind randomized provocational study. BMJ 2006;
332:886-891.
24. Rubin GJ, Munshi JD, Wessely S. Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity:
Asystematic review of provocation studies. Psychosomatic
Medicine 2005; 67:224-232.
25. Schröttner J, Leitgeb N, Hillert L. Investigation of electric current
perception thresholds of different EHS groups. Bioelectromagnetics.
2007; 28:208-13.
26. Schreier N, Huss A., Röösli M, The prevalence of symptoms attributed
to electromagnetic field exposure: Across-sectional representative
survey in Switzerland. Social and Preventive Medicine
2006; 51.
27. Seitz H, Stinner D, Eikmann T, Herr C, Electromagnetic hypersensitivity
(EHS) and subjective health complaints associated
with electromagnetic fields of mobile phone communication-a
literature review published between 2000 and 2004. Science of
The Total Environment. 2005; 349:45-55.
28. Zhao TY, Zou SP, Knapp PE. Exposure to cell phone radiation
up-regulates apoptosis genes in primary cultures of neurons and
astrocytes. Neuroscience Letters 2007; 412: 34-38.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com