You are here

Home » Content

POSTERIOR KOMPOZİTLERD E POSTOPERATİF SORUNLAR VE GİDERİLMESİNE YÖNELİK ÇALIŞMALAR

POSTOPERATIVE PROBLEMS OF POSTERIOR COMPOSITES AND THE STUDIES FOR THE SOLUTION OF THESE PROBLEMS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1992

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this article, the composite resin restorations which are being widely used in the posterior regions a? well as in the anterior regions recently are explained and more information is given about the post-operative problems and their causes. Furthermore, the way these adverse results affect the durability of the restoration in the mouth is also taken into consideration. Finally, the possible restoration techniques which can be chosen in order to eliminate or at least decrease the causes as much as possible are discussed.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makalede, son yıllarda kullanımı giderek artan, ön bölgelere ilave olarak, arka bölgelerde de uygulanımı yaygınlaşan kompozit reçine restorasyonları ele alınmış, ortaya çıkan postoperatif sorunlar ve bunların nedenleri hakkında bilgi verilmiştir. Ayrıca olumsuz sonuçların restorasyonun ağızda kalma süresini ne şekilde etkilediği konusu üzerinde de durulmuş, etkenlerin ortadan kaldırılması veya hiç değilse mümkün olabildiğince azaltılması için seçilebilecek restorasyon teknikleri üzerinde tartışılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-posterior-kompozitlerd-e-postoperatif-sorunlar-giderilmesine-yonelik-calismalar.pdf
  • 2
84
89
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Amsbeıry, W., Von Founhofer, LA,, Hoots, J., Rodgers, H.: Marginal leakage of several acid-etch composite resin restorative systems. /. Prosthet Dent., 1984; 52: 647.
2. Bacher, J., Dermaut, L.: Visible light sources and posterior visible light cured resins: a practical mixture. Quintessence Int., 1986; 17:635.
3. Bandyopadhyay, S.: A study of the volumetric setting shrinkage of some dental materials. J.Biomed.Mater.Res., 1982; Jfi:135.
4. Brackett, W.W., Robinson, P.B.: Composite resin and glass-ionomer cement: current status for use in cervical restorations. Quintessence Int.., 1990; 21:445.
5. Brannström, M., Nordenvafl, KJ.: Bacterial penetration, pulpal reaction and the inner surface of Concise Enamel Band. Composite fillings in etched and unetched cavites. J.Dent.Res., 1978; 1:3.
6. Brannström, M.: The cause of postrestorative sensitivity and its prevention. J.Endod., 1986; 12: 475.
7. Browne, R.M., Tobias, R.S.: Microbial microleakage and pulpal inflammation: Areview. EndodDent. Trav., 1986; 2:177.
8. Chadwick, R.G., Cabe, J.F., Walls, A.W.G.: The effect of placement technique upon the compressive strength and porosity of composite resin. J.Dent., 1989; 17:230.9. Crim, G.A., Chapman, K.W.: Effect of placement techniques on microleakage of dentin-bonded composite resin. Quintessence Int., 1986; 17:21.
10. Crim, G.A.: Assessment of microleakage of three dentinal bonding systems. Quintessence Int., 1990; 21: 295.
11. Eick, J.D., Welch, F.H.: Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int., 1986; 77:103.
12. Fayyad, M.A., Shortall, A.C.C.: Microleakage of dentine bonded posterior composite restorations. J.Dent., 1987; İ5:67.
13. Feilzer, A.J., Dawidson, C.L.: Curing contraction of composits and glass-ionomer cements. J.Prosthet. Dent., 1988; 59: 297.
14. Fusayama, T.: Factors and prevention of palp irritation by adhesive composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int., mi; 18: 633.
15. Goldman, M.: Polymerization shrinkage of resin-based restorative materials. Aust.Dent.J., 1983; 28: 156.
16. Gordon, M., Plasochacrt, J.M., Saiku, J.M.: Microleakage of posterior composite resin materials and an experimental urethane restorative material, tested in vitro above and below the cemento enamel function. Quintessence Int., 1986; 27: 11.
17. Hay, J.N., Shortall, A.C.: Polymerization contraction and reaction kinetics of three chemically activated restorative resins. J.Dent., 1988; 16: 172.
18. Hambree, J.H.: Microleakage of microfilled composite resin restorations with different cavosurface designs. J.Prost-het.Dent., 1984; 52: 653.
19. Johnson, G.H., Gordon, G.E.: Post operative sensitivity associated with posterior composite and Amalgam restorations. Oper. Dent., 1988; 13:66.
20. Jones, J.G., Grieve, A.R., Youngson, C.C.: Marginal leakage associated with three posterior restoraliue materils. J.Dent. 1988; 16:130.
21. Kanca, J.: Posterior resins: microleakage below the ce-mentocnamel junction. Quintessence Int., 1987; 18: 347.
22. Krejci, I., Sparr, D., Lutz, F.: A three-sited light curing technique for conventional class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int., 1987; 18: 125.
23. Leinfeldcr, K.F.: Posterior composite resins. J.Am.Dent. Assoc., (Special Issue), 1988; (Sep): 24-E.
24. Lui, J.L., Masutoni, S., Selco, J.C.: Margin quality and microleakage of Class II composite resin restorations. J.Am.Dentjissoc., 1987; 114:49.
25. Lutz, F.: Die Adhesive Restoration. Zahnarztl. Praxis, 1975; 2tf:51.
26. Lutz, F., Krejci, I.: Improved proximal marginal adaptation of Class II composite resin restoration by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int., 1986; 17: 659.
27. Mair, L.H., Vowles, R.: The effect of thermal cycling on the fracture toghness of seven composite restorative materials. DentMater J., 1989; 5:23.
28. Moffa, LP., Jenkins, WA.: Four year posterior clinical evaluation of two composite resins. J.Dent.Res., 1975; 54:48.
29. Phillips, R.W.: Observations on a composite resin for class II restorations. Three-year report. J.Prosthet.Dent., 1973; 30: 891.
30. Phillips, R.W.: Should I be using amalgam or composite restorative material. Int.Dent.J., 1975; 25:236.
31. Prati, C, Montanari, G.: Comparative microleakage study between the sandwich and conventional three increment techniques. Quintessence Int., 1989; 20: 587.
32. Rees, J.S., Jacobsen, P.H.: The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. DentMater., 1989; 5:41.
33. Rowe, A.H.R.: A five year study of the clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material, J.Dent. 1989; 17: 56.
34. Rupp, N.W., Venz, S., Cobb, N.E.: Sealing of gingival margin of composite restorations. J.Dent-Res., 1983; 62: 254.
35. Sheth, P.J., Jensen, M.E.: Comparative evaluation of three resin inlay techniques: microleakage studies Quintessence. Int., 1989; 20: 831.
36. Swift, E.J.: Pulpal effects of composite resin restorations. Oper Dent, 1989; 14: 20.
37. Walls, A.W.G.: Polymerization contraction of visible light activated composite resins. J.Dent., 1988; 16:Y11.
38. Wilson, N.HF., Smith, G.A.: A clinical trial of a visible light cured posterior composite resin restorative material three year results., Quintessence Int., 1986; 17: 643.
39. Yamaguchi, R., Powers, J.M.: Thermal expansion of visible light cured composite. Oper, Dent., 1989; 14:

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com