You are here

Home » Content

MİNE VE DENTIN BAĞLAYICI SİSTEMLERİNİN YAPISAL VE FİZİKSEL ÖZELİKLERİ

THE STRUCTURAL AND PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF ENAMEL AND DENTIN BONDING SYSTEMS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1994

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Bonding agents can be classified under different groups according to their composition and retention property. In general, bonding systems occur with the reaction of Bisfenol A which is the structure of dimetacrylat and Glisidil Metacrylat. To classify these substances as primer and seconder generation bondings is due to last developments in their structure. Some bonding systems will be applied on the dentin surface. While the choice of the bonding system which will be applied on the dentin surface, to be primer or seconder generation is important; the structural property and the chemical composition of the bonding agent is not important on the effect of the bonding strength on the etching enamel surfaces where the micromechanical retention is obtained.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kompozit restorasyonların, diş dokusuna bağlanma özelliğini iyileştirerek, başarısı ve ağızda kalma süresini arttırıcı rol oynayan bağlayıcı ajanlar, bileşimleri ve tutunma özellikleri açısından farklı gruplar altında toplanabilir. Genel olarak dimetakrilat oluşumunda Bisfenol-A ve Glisidil Metakrilat (BIS-GMA) reaksiyonu ile oluşturulan bağlayıcı sistemleri, yapılarındaki son gelişmelere dayanarak birinci ve ikinci jenerasyon bağlayıcılar olarak gruplamak mümkündür. Dentin yüzeyine uygulanacak bağlayıcı materyalin, birinci ya da ikinci jenerasyon olmasının seçimi söz konusu iken, mikromekanik tutuculuk elde edilen pü-rüzlendirİlmİş yüzeylerde, bağlayıcı ajanın yapısal özellikleri ve kimyasal bileşimi, bağlanma şiddetine etki etme açısından önemli değildir. Kompozit restorasyonlarında ele alınan en önemli sorunlardan biri olan mikrosızıntı olayı da kullanılan bağlayıcıların yapısal özellikleri ve kullanılan restorasyon teknikleri ile yakından ilgilidir. Kompozit restorasyonlarının başarısı açısından, kompozit reçine - cami-yonomer siman beraberliğinin ve uygun bağlayıcı ajan seçimi ile oluşturulan kombinasyonun çok büyük anlam taşıdığı çalışmalarla ortaya konmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-mine-dentin-baglayici-sistemlerinin-yapisal-fiziksel-ozelikleri.pdf
  • 1
74
79
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Andreaus S B: Liquid versus gel etchants on glass iono-mers: Their effects on surface morphology and shear bond strengths to composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1987: 114:157¬8.
2. Asmussen E, Munksgaard E C: Bonding of restorative resins to dentine: Status of dentine adhesives and impact on cavity design and filling techniques. IntDentJ 1988:38: 97-9.
3. Association Reports. Dentin bonding systems: an Update Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. J Am Dent Assoc 1987:114: 91-5.
4. Atkinson A S, Pearson G J: The evaluation of glassiono-mer cements. Br Dent J1985:159: 335-7.
5. Bowen R L, Tung M S, Blosser R L: Dentine and enamel bonding agents./nf Denr/ 1987: 37: 158-60.
6. Bracket! W W, Robinson P B: Composite resin and glassi-onomer cement: Current status for use in cervical restorations. Quintessence Int 1990:21: 445-7.
7. Causton B E, Sefton J: Some bonding characteristic of a HEMA/maleicasid adhesion promoter. Br Dent J 1989: 167: 308-11.
8. Causton B E, Sefton J, Williams A: Bonding class II composite to etched glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1987: 163: 321-4.
9. Cheung G S P: An in vitro evaluation of five dentinal adhesives in posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 1990: 21: 513-6.
10. Chin Y H, Tyas M J: Adhesion of composite resin to etched glass ionomer cement. Aust Dent J1988: 33: 87-90.
11. Crim G A: Assessment of microleakage of twelve restorative systems. Quintessence Int 1987:18: 419-22.
12. Crim G A: Assessment of microleakage of three dentinal bonding systems. Quintessence Int 1990:21: 295-7.
13. Douglas W H: Clinical status of dentine bonding agents. /Be/i< 1989: İ 7: 209-12.
14. Duncanson M G, Miranda F J, Probst R T: Resin dentin bonding agents-rationale and results. Quintessence Int 1986: 17: 625-9.
15. Ear] MS A, Mount G J, Huma W R: The effect of varnishes and other surface treatments on water movement across the glassionomer cement surface. Aust Dent J1989: 34: 326-9.
16. Eick J D, Welch F H: Polimerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and effect on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int1986:17: 103-11.
17. Erickson R L: Mechanism and clinical implications of bond formation for two dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 1989: 2:117-20.
18. Fayyad M A, ShortalJ A C C: Microleakage of dentine bonded posterior composite restorations./ Dent 1987: 15: 67¬72.
19. Garcia-Godoy F, Malone W F P: The effect of acid etching on two glass ionomer lining cements. Quintessence Int 1986:17: 621-3.
20. Gordon M, Plasschaert A J M, Soelberg K B, Bogdan M S: Microleakage of four composite resins over a glassionomer cement base in class V restorations. Quintessence Int 1985: 12: 817-20.
21. Gordon M, Plasschaert A J M, Saiku J M, Pelzner R B: Microleakage of posterior composite resin materials and an experimental urethane restorative material, tested in vitro above and below the cementoenamel junction. Quintessence Int 1986:17: 11-3.
22. Hinoura K, Moore B K, Phillips R W: Tensile bond stength between glassionomer cements and composite resins. J Am Dent Assoc 1987:114:167-72.
23. Hinoura K, Onose H, Moore B K: Effect of the bonding agent on the bond strength between glassionomer cement and composite resin. Quintessence Int 1989: 20: 31-5.
24. Joynt R B, Williams D, Davis E L, Wieczkowski G: Effects of etching time on surface morphology and adhesion of a posterior resin to glass-ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 1989: 61:310-4.
25. Kanca J: Posterior resins: Microleakage below the cementoenamel junction. Quintessence Int 1987:18: 347-9.
26. Krabbendam C A, Harkel H C, Duijstres P P E: Shear bond strength determinations on various kinds of luting cements with tooth structure and cast alloys using a new testing device. J Dent 1987:15:11-81.
27. Lui J L, Masutani S, Setcos J C, Lutz F: Margin quality and microleakage of class II composite resin restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1987:114: 49-55.
28. Lutz F, Krejci I, Luescher B: Improved proximal margin adaptation of class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges. Quintessence Int 1986:17: 659-64.
29. Mc Lean J W: Glass-ionomer cements. Br Dent J1988: 164: 293-300.
30. Meyers R, Garcia-Godoy F, Norling B K: Failure mode of a posterior composite resin bonded to a glassionomer cement
Mine ve Dentin Bağlayıcı Sistemlerinin Yapısal ve Fiziksel Özellikleri
79
treated with various etching times and with or without a coupling agent. Quintessence Int 1990:21; 501-3.
31. Mount G J: The wettability of bonding resins used in the composite resin/glass ionomer sandwich technique. Aust Dent J 1989: 34; 32-5.
32. Mount G J: The tensile strength of the union between various glass ionomer cements and various composite resins. Aust Dent J 1989: 34:136-46.
33. Munksgaard E C, Asmussen E: Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by mixtures of HEMA and glutaraldehyde. J Dent Res 1984: 63: 1087-90.
34. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E: Bonding and gap formation of glass-ionomer cement used in conjunction with composite resin. Acta OdontoIScand 1989: 47; 141-3.
35. Phillips R W, Jendersen M D, Klooster J, McNeil C, Preston J D, Schallhorn R G: Report of the commitee on scientific investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. JProsthetDent 1990: 64: 74-110.
36. Phillips S, Bishop B M: An in vitro study of the effect of moisture on glass ionomer cement. Quintessence Int 1985:2: 175-7.
37. Pintado M R, Douglas W H: The comparison of microleakage between two different dentin bonding resin systems. Quintessence Int 1988:19: 905-7.
38. Prati C, Montanari G: Comparative microleakage study between the sandwich and conventional three-increment techniques. Quintessence Int 1989: 20: 587-94.
39. Sheth J J, Jensen M E, Sheth PJ, Versteeg J: Effect of etching glassionomer cements on bond strength to composite resin. J Dent Res 1989: 68:1082-5.
40. Shortall A, Asmussen E: Influence of dentin-bonding agents and a glass-ionomer base on the cervical marginal seal of class II composite restorations. Scand J Dent Res 1988: 96: 590-4.
41. Subrata G, Davidson L: The effect of various surface treatments on the shear strength between composite resin and glassionomer cement..//ten/ 1989:17: 28-31.
42. Suzuki M, Gwinnett A J, Jordan R E: Relationship between composite resins and dentin treated with bonding agents. J Am Dent Assoc 1989:118: 75-7.
43. Welbury R R, McCabe J F, Murray J J and Rusby S: Factors affecting the bond strength of composite resin to etched glassionomer cement. J Dent 1988:16: 188-93.
44. Wexler G, Beech D R: Bonding of a composite restorative material to etched glassionomer cement. Aust Dent 1988: 33: 4-7.
45. Wolski K, Goldman M, Kronman J H, Nathanson D: Dentinal bonding afer chemomechanical caries removal effect of surface topography. OperDent 1989:14: 87-90.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com