You are here

Home » Content

DİŞSİZ BİREYLERDE PROTEZLERİN POSTURAL YÜZ YÜKSEKLİĞİNE ETKİLERİ

EFFECT OF DENTURES ON POSTURAL FACE HEIGHT IN EDENTULOUS SUBJECTS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1996

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The effect of wearing and not weoring dentures on mandibular rest position in edentulous subjects were reported. In this study, 52 edentulous patients attending to our clinics were studied prior to completion of dentures. In all patients, the postural face height was measured in milimeters from a dot marked on the of the nose and the most prominent part of the chin. This dimension was measured with no dentures, smallest rest height (67.90 mm.) was recorded with no dentures in the mouth and the greatest rest height (70.33 mm.) found with both dentures in the mouth.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Dişsiz bireylerde, mandibular istirahat pozisyonu belirlenmesinde, protezlerin takılmasının ve çıkarılmasının etkili olduğu bildirilmiştir. Bu çalışma, kliniğimize başvuran 52 dişsiz hastada, tam protez bitirilmeden yapılmıştır. Tüm bireylerdeki istirahat yüz yüksekliği, burun ucuna ve çenenin en uç noktasına konulan iki nokta arasındaki mesafe milimetrik olarak ölçülerek bulundu. Bu boyut, protez takılmadan, sadece alt protez, sadece üst protez ve her iki protez takıldıktan sonra ölçüldü. En düşük yüz yüksekliği protezler ağızda bulunmadığında (67.90 mm.), en yüksek yüz yüksekliği her iki protez ağızda iken (70.33 mm.) bulunmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-dissiz-bireylerde-protezlerin-postural-yuz-yuksekligine-etkileri.pdf
  • 3
121
124
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Araki, NG, araki CT: Head angulation and variations in the maxillomandibular relationship. Part I: The effects on the vertical dimension of occlusion J. Pros. Dent. 1987; 5S:96-100.
2. Cohen S.: A cephalomctric study of rest position in edentulous persons: Influence of variations in head position,/. Pros. Dent. 1957; 7.467-72.
3. Fayz F, Eslami A, Graser GN: Use of anterior teeth measurements in determning occlusal vertical dimension,/ Pros. Dent 1987; 58:317-22.
4. GarnickJ, Ramfjord SP: Rest position. An electromyographic and clinical investigation,/. Pros. Dent 1962; 12: 895-910.
5. Heath MR, Boutros MM: The influence of prosthesis on mandibular posture in edentulous patients, / Pros. Dent 1984;5/:602-4.
6. Lambadakis J, Karkazis HC: Changes in the mandibular rest position after removal of remaining teeth and insertion of complete dentures,/ Pros. Dent. 1982; -/5:74-7.
7. Murpy WM: Rest position of the madible,/ Pros. Dent. 1967; J7:329-32.
8. Olsen ES: A radiographic study of variations in the physiological rest position of the mandible in seventy eden¬tulous individuals^/ Dent Res., 1951; .30:517-20.
9. Posselt U: The pysiology of occlusion and rehabilitation, 2nd ed. Oxford and edinburg: BlackweU, Scientific Pub., 1968: 24-68.
10. Tallgren A: The continuing reduction of the residual ridge in complete denture wearers: a mixed longitudinal study covering 24 years./. Pros. Dent 1972; 27:120-32.
11. Thompson S, Tuncay OC, Abadi B, Ellinger CW: Cephalometric evaluation of the changes in patients wearing complete dentures. A ten year longitudinal study./ Pros. Dent 1984; 52:169-80
12. Wessberg GA, Epkcr BN, Elliot AC: Comparison of mandibular rest position induced by phonetics, transcuta-neus electrical stimulation, and masticatory electrical stimulation, and masticatory electromkyograpy, / Pros. Dent 1983; 49:100-

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com