You are here

MANDIBULER DERI GREFTLEME VESTİBÜLOPLASTİLERİNDE SULKUS DERİNLİĞİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

EVALUATION OF THE SULCUS DEPTH IN MANDIBULAR SKIN GRAFTING VESTIBULOPLASTIES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Skin grafts have been used extensively in mandibular vesti-bufcplasties. Among the several advantages, retention o] the more sulcus depth than those of the other procedures is one of the most prominent features of skin grafting. In the presented study, 11 patients undergoing mandibular shin grafting vestibuloblasty, operated at the Dental Service oj Haydarpaşa Training Hospital, are followuP for 6 months in ordJto evaluate Ulcus depht redntion uslL standardized measurement method. Retrospective evaluation of the results has revealed that 83% of the sulcus debth which gained oPevativeh could be retained when the full thickness skin graft was applied in mandibular vestibüloplasty
Abstract (Original Language): 
Mandibüler vestibüloplastilerde deri greftlemesi, uzun yıllardır uygulanan ve sıklıkla tercih edilen operasyonlardandır. Greftlemenin temel hedeflerinden birisi de vestibüler sulkus derinliğinin korunmasıdır. Uygun endikasyonları taşıyan hastalarda tarafımızdan da deri greftleri kullanılmakta ve olumlu sonuçları izlenmektedir. Sunulan çalışmada GATA Haydarpaşa Eğitim Hastanesi Diş Servisinde, mandibüler deri greftleme vestibüloplastisi yapılan 11 hastada, standart yönteme göre vestibüler sulkus derinliği ölçülmüş ve sonuçlar retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Greftlemeyi takiben altı ay boyunca yapılan ölçümler incelendiğinde, tam kalınlık deri grefüerinin, vestibüler sulkus derinliğini % 83 oranında koruduğu tespit edilmiştir.
153
159

REFERENCES

References: 

1- Arnhem consensus on preprosthetic surgery, May 1989. İntJ Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989: 29:10-1.
2- Bell FA. Patients' evaluations of mandibular skin graft vestibuloplasty./ Oral Surg 1976: .7*707-10.
3- CawoodJI, Howell RA. A classification of edentulous jaws, hit J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988:17:232-6.
4- Davis WH, Davis CL. Surgical management of soft tissue problems. In: Fonseca RJ, Davis WH eds. Reconstructive Preprosthetic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: WBSaunders Co, 1986: 69-116.
5- DonoffRB. Biologic basis for vestibuloplasty procedures./ Oral Surg 1976: 5*890-6.
6. Gregory EW, Triplett RG, Connole PW. Comparison of fresh autogenous and freeze-dried allogeneic skin for mandibular vestibuloplasty. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983:«:75-9.
7- Guernsey LH. Soft tissue grafts in oral and maxillofa-cia surgery. In: Robinson PJ, Guernsey LH ends. Clinical Transplantation in Dental Specialties. I st ed, St. Louis: CV Mosby Co, 1980: 192-211.
8-
Güler R. Vestibüloplastilerde Liyofilize Amniyotik Membramn Greft Materyeli Olarak Kullanılabilirliğinin Klinik ve Deneysel Olarak İncelenmesi. H. Ü. Sağhh Bilimleri Entitüsü Doktora Tezi. Ankara, 1992.
'9- Hillerup S, Solow B. Soft tissue profile changes after mandibular vestibuloplasty. A two-year follow-up study comparing the Edlan flap, mucosal and skin graft methods, huJ Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990: 19.12-7.
10- Hjorting-Hansen E, Adawy A, Hillerup S. Mandibular vestibulolingual sulcolplasty with free skin graft. A five-year clinical follow-up study. / Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983: 4/.-173-6.
11- Hopkins R, Stafford GD, Gregory MC. Pre-prosthe-tic surgery of the edentulous mandible. Br Dent J 1980: J4S.-IS3-S.
12- Hupp JR. Prevention and management of medical emergencies. In: Peterson LJ, Ellis E, Hupp JR, Tucker MR eds. Contemporary Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. St Louis: CVMosby Co, 1988: 48-9.
13- Indresano AT, Laskin DM. Procedures to improve the bony alveolar ridge. In: Laskin DM ed. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1st ed, St Louis: CVMosby Co, 1985: 336-8.
14- Kaspar DW, Laskin DM. The effect of porcine skin and autogenous epithelial grafts on the contraction of experimental oral wounds./ Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983: 42:143¬52.
15- Koehnlein HG, Dietrich EE. Influence of different tension on growth of skin grafts. Surg Forum 1975: 26: 562¬9.
16- Landesman HM, Levin B. A patient surver of denture tolerance before and after a mandibular vestibuloplasty with skin grafting. JADA 1975: 90:806-10.
17- Landesman HM, Davis WH, Martinoff J, Kaminishi R. Resorption of the edentulous mandible after a vestibuloplasty with skin grafting. J Prosthet Dentl 983: «,619-24.
18- Macintosh RB, Obwegeser HL. Preprosthetic surgery: A scheme for its effective employment. / Oral Surg 1967: 25397-413.
19- Madden W. On "the contractile fibroblast". Plant Re-cohtr Surg 1973: 52391-2.
20- Morton D, Madden JW, Peacock EE. Effect of a local smooth muscle antagonist on wound contraction. Surg Forum 1972: 25511-5.
21- Raghoebar GM, Tomson AM, Scholma J, Blaauw EH, Witjes MJH, Vissink A. Use of cutured mucosal grafs to cover defects caused by vestibuloplasty: An in vivo study./ OralMaxUtofac Surg 1995: 55:872-8.
22- Rudolph R. The effect on skin graft preparation on wound contraction. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1976: «2.49-56.
23- Rudolph R. Inhibition of myofibroblasts by skin grafting. PlastReconstrSurg. 1979: 65.473-80.
24- Samit A, Popowich L. Mandibular vestibuloplasty: A clinical update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1982: 54:141-7.
25. Sanders B, Starshak TJ. Vestibuloplasty. In: Starshak TJ, Sanders B. Preproshetic Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1st ed, St Louis: CVMosby Co, 1980: 165-213.
VestibiUoptastilerde Sulkus
Derinliğinin DeğerlendirUmes
159
26.
Yaman Z, Kişnişci RŞ, Ersoy E. Mandibüler deri greft-leme vestibÜloplastileri. AÜDisHehFahDergim 21: 207-i 1.
27. Zarb GA. Nature and significance of the edentulous
state. In: Branemark P, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T eds. Tissue-Integrated Prostheses Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publ Co, 1985: 85-6.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com