concentration and tissue type on the solvent ability of sodium hypochlorite. JEIKWOH 1982: 7:37»-7.
2. Ahmad M, Pits Ford TR, Gum LA. Ulirasonic debridement of root canals; An insight inio (he mcchananisms involved. / Endodon 1987: O.WA 01.
3. Ahmad M, Pitt lord TR, Crura IA Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: An acoustic streaming and its possible vo\c J Endodon 1987: /3.-49Ö-9.
4. Alaçam T. Scanning electron microscope study comparing the efficacy of endodontic irrigating systems. Lit En-dot//1987: 20:287-94.
5. Baker MC, Ashrafi Sir, van Cura ]E, Rcmeikis NA. Ulirasonic compared with hand instrumentation: a scanning electron microscope study./Endodon 1988: M.435-10.
6. Baumgaitner jC, Cuncin PR. Efficacy of several concentrations of sodium hupochlorile for root anal irrigation. /Endodon 1992: /&605-12.
7. Cameron jA. The use of ultrasond in the cleaning o( root canals: a clinical repon. J Endodon 1982: #472-4.
8. Cameron ]A. The use of ullı-.ısonies in the removal ol smear layer: a scanning electron microscope study./£»do-don 1983: 5:289-929. Cameron
JA
. The use of sodium hypochlorite acıiva-led by ullrasoııd for llıc dcbricnıeni of infcclcd immalurc root c;ın;ıls. J£«dodojı 1986: 72:550-4.
10. Cameron JA. The synergistic relationship between ullrasoııd and sodium hypochlorite: a scanning' electron microscope cvfihialion./E/H/W/OH 1987: 73:541-5.
11. Cameron JA. The effect of ultrasonic endodontics on the temperature of the roof canal will. J Endodon 1988: 14: 554-9.
12. Cameron JA. The use of ultrasond for the removal of the smear layer. The effect of sodium hypochlorite concentration; SEM study. Aust Dent71988: 33:193-200.
13. Cunningham WT, BaSckjian AY. Effect of temperature on collagen-dissolving ability of sodium hypochlorite endodontic irriganl. Ora/SHrgl980: 49:175-7.
14. Cunningham "WT, Joseph S, Effect of temperature on the bactericidal action of sodium hypochlorite endodontic irrigant. Oral Surg 1980:50:5(59-73.
15. Cunningham WT, Martin H, Forrest WR. Evaluation of root canal debridement by the endosonic ultasonic synergistic system. Oral Surg 1982: 53:401-4.
16. Cunningham WT, Martin H. A scanning electron microscope evaluation of root canal debridement with the endosonic ultrasonic synergistic system. Oral Surg 1982: 53:527-31.
17. Cunningham WT, Martin H, Pclleu GB, Sloops DE. A comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness of endosonic and hand toot amal therapy. Oral Surg 1982: 54:238-4Î,
18. Cymerman JJ, Jerome LA, Moodnik RM. A scanning electron microscope study comparing the efficacy of hand instrumentation with ulirasonic instrumentation of the root canal J Endodon 1983: 9:327-31.
19. Dycdala GR. Chlorine and chlorine compounds. Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. 3rd cd. Philadelphia:!™ &Felnger, 1983: 152.
20. Even SJ. Ulirasonic therapy in periodontics. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1968: 12-32.
21. Goldberg F, Soarcs I, Massonc FJ, Soarcs IM. Comparative debridement study between hand and sonic instrumentation of the root canal. Endod Dent Traumalol 1988: 4:229-34.
22. Goodman A, Reader A, Beck M el al. An in vitro comparison of the efficacy of the step back technique versus a slcp-back/uhrasonic technique in human mandibular mohn s. J Endodon 1985: 77:249-56.
23. Griffiths BM, Stock CJR. The efficiency of irrigams in removing root canal debris when used with an ultrasonic preparation technique. bit Endodon J1986: 79:277-84,
24. Lev R, Reader A, Beck M, Meyers W. An in vitro comparison of the step-back ichenique versus a slep-back/ullrasonic technique for 1 and 3 minutes. J Endodon 1987: 73:523-530.
25. Lumlay PJ, Walmsley AD, laiia WRE. Ulirasonic ins-trumcnts in dentistry. 2, Fndosonies. Dental Updale]988: 75:362-9.
26. Marlih H. Ulirasonic disinfection of the root canal. Oml Surg 1976: 42:92-9.
27. Marlih H, Cunningham WT, NorrisJP, Collon WR. Ulirasonic versus hand filling of dentin: a quantitative study. Oral Surg 1980:49:79-81.
28. Marlih H, Cunningham WT. "Endosonic endodontics" the ulirasonic synergistic system, Techniques in clinical endodontics. 2nd cd. Philadelphia: WB .Saunders Company, 1983: 316.
29. Moorcr WR, Wcssclink PR, Factors promoting the tissue dissolving capability of sodium hypochlorite, bit J Endod 1982: 75:187-96.
30. Nakaimira H, Kalsuhisa A, Hidctoshi F el al, The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on bovine tendon collagen, bovine pulp and bovine gingiva Oral Surg 1985: 60.-322-6.
31.
Öııal B, Dalai D. Farklı irrigasyon solüsyonlarının ullrasoııiklc genişletilmiş kök kanallarındaki etkilerinin SEM ile değerlendirilmesi. AÜ Diş Hek. Fak. DergWyl: 79:215-9.
32. Richman MJ. The use of ultrasonics in root canal therapy and root resection. J Dent Med 1957: 72(7):12-8.
33. Slamos DE, Sadeghi EM. Haasch GC, Gcrslein H. An in vitro comparison study lo quanlitalc the debridement ability of hand, sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation. J Endodon )987: 73.434-40.
34. W;Jmsley AD. Ultrasond and root canal treatment: the need for scientific evaluation, bit Endod/1987: 20:105¬11.
35. Williams AR, Slade JS. Ultrasonic dispersal of aggregates of sarcina lutca. Ultrasonics 1971: 9:85-7.
36. Yamaguchi M, Matsumori M, Ishikawa H, el al. The use of ultrasonic instrumentation in the cleansing and enlargement of the root canal. Oral Surg 1988: 65:349-53.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com