You are here

Home » Content

SEKONDER VE REZİDÜEL ÇÜRÜK SIKLIĞI

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1999

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this clinical sun'ey- study which was performed on 1266 Class II amalgam restorations was to asses the incidence of secondary caries and reccurent caries resultes by residuel caries which cause the replacement. The age, sex, icluded surfaces of the restoration, surface roughness and duration of the restoration, and the location of the caries were recorded. Data obtained were subjected to ( Chi square ) test following logistic regression analysis test. The results were as follows: The prevalances of secondary caries and residuel caries was 8,135% and 5,608% respectively. The incidence of caries had shown no statistically significant correlation to the age.sex, duration and surface roughness of restoration and the included surfaces of the restoration. The site of the dental arch did not influence the development of secondary caries and progress of the residuel caries. The incidences of secondary and residuel caries did not show any differences between the upper and lower jaws. Statistically significant increase in the incidence of secondary caries at the gingival margin of the restoration was notable in this study.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
1266 Klas II amalgam restorasyon incelenerek yapılan klinik -survey araştırmanın amacı; Klas II amalgam restorasyonlarda rastlanılan ve restorasyonun tekrarlanmasına neden olan sekonder çürükler ve rezidüel çürüklerden kaynaklanan rekkürent çürüklerin sıklığını saptamaktır. 1266 Klas II amalgam restorasyonun klinik ve radyolojik olarak incelenmesi ile yapılan çalışmada sekonder ve rezidüel çürüklerin lokalizasyonlarının yeri, ayrıca bireylerin yaşı, cinsiyeti.restorasyon süresi, restorasyonun içerdiği diş yüzeyleri, restorasyon yüzeyinin pürüzlülüğü de dikkate alınmıştır. Bulgular lojistik regresyon analizi ardından X2 testi ile istatistiksel olarak değerlendirilmiş ve aşağıdaki sonuçlar alınmıştır. Sekonder çürüklerin sıklığı % 8,135 ve residuel çürüklerin sıklığı % 5,608 dir. Her iki çürük tipinin sıklığı İle yaş, cinsiyet.restorasyon süresi, içerdiği diş yüzeyleri, restorasyon yüzeyinin pürüzlülüğü arasında istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı bir bağıntı yoktur. Çenelerin sağ ya da sol yarım çene olması ve alt ya da üst olması sekonder çürüklerin gelişmesinde ve rezidüel çürüklerin ilerlemesinde etkili değildir. Sekonder çürüklerin gingival kenardaki lokalizasyonu istatistiksel açıdan anlamlı şekilde fazladır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sekonder-reziduel-curuk-sikligi.pdf
  • 1-4
93
106
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1- Anderson MH,Charbeneau GT. A comparison of digital and optical criteria for detecting carious dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1985:53:643-646.
2- Boyd MA, Richardson AS. Frequency of amalgam replacement in general dental practice. J Canad Dent Assoc 1985:51:763-766.
3- Drake CW. Dental restoration longevity: survival functions and statistical indices in low and high failure rate groups. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1988:16:258-262.
4- Eide R, Birkeland JM. Revisjon av fyllinger-lokalisasjon aV defekter. Nor Tannlegefor Tid 1982:92:159-162.
5- Espelid I, Tveit AB. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam. Int Dent J 1991:41:359-364.
6- Foster LV. Validity of clinical judgements for the presence of secondary caries associated with defective amalgam restorations. Br Dent J 1994:177:89-93.
7- Kidd EAM, Smith BGN, Pickard HM. Pickard's Manual of Operative Dentistry. 6 îh. ed Oxford University Press. Walton Street, Oxford, 1985:3-24.
8- Kidd EAM, Toffenetti F, Mjor IA. Secondary caries. Int Dent J 1992:42:127-138.
9- Maryniuk GA, Kaplan SH. Longevity of restorations: survey results of dentists' estimates and attitudes. J Am Dent Assoc 1986:112:39-45.
10- Marzouk MA, Simonton AL, Gross RD. Modern Theory and Practice. 1th Ishiyaku EuroAmerica, Inc. St. Louis, Tokyo, 1985:1-56.
11- Merrett MCW, Elderton RJ. An in vitro study of restorative dental treatment decisions and dental caries. Br Dent J 1984:157:128-133.
12- Mjör IA. Placement and replacement of restorations. Oper Dent 1981:6:49-54.
13- Mjor I A. Frequency of secondary caries at various anatomical locations. Oper Dent 1985:10:88-92.
14- Mjor IA, Smith DC. Detailed evaluation of six Class 2 amalgam restorations. Oper Dent 1985:10:17-21.
106
M. DEMİRCİ., F.KORAY, N.TURAN
15- Mjor IA, Toffenetti F. Placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Italy. Oper Dent 1992: 17:70-73.
16- Naujoks R. Epidemiologic der Karies.ImKetterl W, ed. .Zahnerhaltung I. 2th. Urban&Schwarzenberg, München, 1987:27-45.
17- Newbrun E. Problems in caries diagnosis. Int Dent J 1993:43:133-142.
18- Paterson FM, Paterson RC, Watts A. Blinkhorn AS. Initial stages in the development of valid criteria for the replacement of amalgam restorations.J Dent 1995:23:137-143.
19- Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjor IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 1990:48:297-303.
20- Rytomaa I, Murtomaa H, Turtola L, Lind K. Clinical assessment of amalgam fillings. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1984:12:169-172.
21- Söderholm K.-J, Antonson DE, Fischlweiger W. Correlation between marginal discrepancies at the amalgam / tooth interface and recurrent caries. In Anusavice KJ(Ed.). Quality evaluation of dental restorations: Criteria for placement and replacement. Chicago:Quintessence Book 1989:95-108.
22- York AK, Arthur JS. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps. Oper Dent 1993:18:203-208.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com