You are here

Home » Content

MAKSİLLOFASİYAL PROTEZLERDE ADEZİVLER

ADHESIVES IN MAXILLOFACIAL PROSTHESIS

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In the success of the maxillofacial prosthesis, retention has a great influence as good as aesthetic. There are various adhesive systems to hold the maxillofacial prosthesis in the suitable position. These are acrylic resin adhesives, silicon adhesives and pressure-sensitive adhesives. Silicon elastomers are the widely used materials nowadays. Choosing the suitable adhesive depends on the prosthetic material and the skin on which to be applied. The adhesives used for maxillofacial prosthesis have many superior properties. However, there is not an adhesive that has ideal properties, so many other studies must be carried on.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Maksillofasiyal protezlerin başarısında estetik kadar retansiyonunun sağlanmasının da büyük etkisi vardır. Maksillofasiyal protezleri istenilen pozisyonda tutabilmek için çeşitli adeziv sistemleri vardır. Bunlar, akrilik reçine adezivler, silikon adezivler ve basınca duyarlı banttır. Günümüzde en yaygın olarak kullanılan maksillofasiyal protez materyalleri silikon elastomerleridir. Uygun adezivin seçimi, protetik materyale ve uygulanacağı dokuya bağlıdır. Maksillofasiyal protez adezivlerinİn birbirinden üstün birçok özellikleri bulunmaktadır, fakat günümüzde İdeal özelliklere sahip bir adeziv olmadığı için daha çok çalışma yapılması gerektiği düşünülmektedir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-maksillofasiyal-protezlerde-adezivler.pdf
  • 1-2
27
30
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Beumer J. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation Prosthodontic and Surgical Considerations. Canada: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica Inc., 1996.
2. Lai JH, Wang IX, Ko CC, DeLong RL, Hodges JS. New organosilicon maxillofacial prosthetic materials. Dent Mat 2002 ; 18: 281¬6.
3. Marion LR, Rothenberger SL, Minsley GE. A method of fabrication of a facial prosthesis that improves retention and durability: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1997 ; 77: 457-60.
4. Markt JC, Lemon JC. Extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center: A survey of patient attitudes and opinions. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 608¬13.
5. Amato L, Asher ES. Use of denture adhesive to retain an extraoral facial prosthetic wax pattern for trial placement. J Prosthet Dent 2002 ; 88: 542-3.
6. Kiat-amnuay S, Gettleman L, Khan Z, Goldsmith LJ. Effect of adhesive retention on maxillofacial prostheses Part 1: Skin dressing and solvent removers. J Prosthet Dent 2000 ; 84: 335-40.
7. Lai JH, Hodges JS. Effects of processing parameters on physical properties of the silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials. Dent Mat 1999; 15:450-5.
Meltem OZDEMIR KARATAŞ, Didem OZDEMIR, Ayşen NEKORA AZAK, Gülümser EVLIOGLU
Polyzois GL, Qilo G, Dahi JE. Tensile bond strength of maxillofacial adhesives. J Prosthet Dent 1993 ; 69: 374-7.
McKinstry RE. Fundamentals of Facial Prosthetics. USA: ABI Professional Publications 1995.
Taft RM, Cameron SM> Knudson RC, Runyan DA. The effect of primers and
surface characteristics on the adhesion-i n-peel force of silicone elastomers bonded to resin materials. J Prosthet Dent 1996 ; 76: 515-8.
11. Kiat-amnuay S, Gettleman L, Khan Z, Goldsmith LJ. Effect of adhesive retention on maxillofacial prostheses Part 2: Time and reapplication effects. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 438-41.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com